Time Warner-Comcast Merger: A Bad Move for Both Companies

Source: Comcast Corporation

Since deregulation of the cable television industry in 1996, rates have more than doubled. At the time, the legislation was heralded as good for consumers, but what followed was a constant stream of mergers combining many small options into a group of much larger cable providers. This past week, the two largest providers in the United States, Time Warner Cable (NYSE: TWC  )  and Comcast (NASDAQ: CMCSK  ) , announced a merger worth $45 billion that they claimed was great for consumers and competition. It will be great for consumers, but not in the way that this giant company thinks.

Cable executives report this as a merger that will bring a better and more efficient cable distribution experience for several reasons. It will give them more leverage with program developers like CBS. This would prevent blackouts like the one that lasted for roughly a month last summer, or the more than 80 other smaller ones that occurred last year.

The larger coverage would also allow them to provide better customer service due to the economies of scale, saving $1.5 billion, according to the Chicago Tribune. In addition, the more resources consolidated in one company would allow them to develop new products to compete with the now commonplace non-cable alternatives.

Not so fast

These ideas all have merit and could be supported with facts. However, history and psychology would suggest that companies are profit-driven, and therefore, act in their self interest to work toward the specific incentive of making more money. I do not expect these two companies to be any different. This initially does not bode well for consumers for a few big reasons.

Time Warner Cable and Comcast combining would merge control of about a third of the country's cable customers into one company. Customers are already stuck paying whatever these companies decide in the many areas where they are the only option for cable. The two giants do not provide in any of the same zip codes across the country. With any luck, this will only keep rates at their current levels, rather than encourage an increase.

In addition, these two companies have placed at the absolute bottom of customer service quality lists for years. Putting them together does not suggest an improvement in this area.

Bye-bye, cable

All of the changes that come along with this merger could be good for consumers or bad for consumers, depending on which side you ask. However, this merger will ultimately be bad for the business and stock prices of both Comcast and Time Warner Cable because it will mark the tipping point for consumers to start "cord-cutting."

Cord-cutting is when customers decide to end their cable provider agreements in lieu of the many Internet provided alternatives like Apple's iTunes, Netflix, Amazon.com, and HBO GO TV to name a few. This trend is accelerating. Last year was cable's worst in losing subscribers, a net 113,000, according to the research firm MoffettNathanson. 

As the companies combine their services more and more over time, the high rates, low customer service quality, and lack of options for other cable providers will push more and more potential customers toward these low commercial, on-demand options. Those two features alone are enough to make many people already split their time between cable programming and other alternatives.

These cable providers claim that this larger company will enable them to bring a competing service to the market, but this will be too little too late. These other services already have the infrastructure, customer base, and branding in place to succeed over cable company products that are late to the market. Consumers are deciding enough is enough and it is too late for cable providers to reverse this trend, no matter how big they get.

The next step for you

You know cable's going away. But do you know how to profit? There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Currently, cable grabs a big piece of it. That won't last. And when cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They're not Netflix, Google, and Apple.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 21, 2014, at 3:33 PM, smilingdon wrote:

    Well it's time to start sharpening the scissors! The guys a pricing themselves out of business due to their greed!

  • Report this Comment On February 21, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Spinner007 wrote:

    A couple of points that need correcting and clarifying:

    This is a buy, not a merger. Comcast is offering about $158 per share on a stock worth about $118. This will have Comcast all over it, and TW will no longer be in existence.

    Second, cable prices have increased since 96 but not as much as you suggest. we have to keep in mind that most companies did not offer broadband cable Internet options at the time, and comcast, or many other cable tv co's did not have voice services then as well. So the bundled packages were simply not available with the options and speeds back then as they have today. You would also have to deduct the cost of stand alone phone services(about $116/month before i switched to VOIP) in a household family budget to get a true cost comparison.

    You would also have to compare packages and offerings at that time to today's, which offerings clearly have increased. My TV only package in the late 80's was about 65/month without HD or DVRs or On Demand. Today, a non promo offer for TV only with standard def and equivalent channel offering is about $87 and still comes with far more channels than i had back then and now with on demand.

    As costs have increased, its more because more options to bundle, more features(dvr, on demand), channels, HD, broadband speeds and technologies have been added and/or increased.

    Third: for the most part, you can't cut the cord even when optioning for Netflix, Hulu, etc. Consumers still need the delivery system to get the signal to the house, and wireless networks from the cell companies simply isnt capable of delivering the amount of bandwidth needed for those purposes. It's still got to be fed into the homes, and cable companies are the only ones in place at this time to do it at reasonable costs.

    As for real cost for families, it comes down to the consumer, and what they choose to have and what they choose to live without.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2849327, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/30/2014 12:07:56 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement