A Slow Shift to 3D NAND Is Good News for SanDisk Corporation

Flash memory maker SanDisk (NASDAQ: SNDK  ) may have caught a break, as Samsung (NASDAQOTH: SSNLF  ) has supposedly pushed out its 3D NAND ramp after reports that it cut specialty equipment orders. SanDisk's timeline doesn't include 3D NAND technology until the second half of 2015, whereas Samsung began mass production last August, and Micron Technology (NASDAQ: MU  ) intends to start sampling its 3D NAND products in the first half of the year.

Meanwhile, SanDisk remains a leader in planar, or 2D, NAND solutions, providing the lowest cost. The company will ramp its 1Y (19nm x 19.5nm) technology this year, which made up just 15% of production in the fourth quarter of 2013, and transition to 1Z next year. Meanwhile, Micron's 16nm technology has room for improvement as well as its 20.5nm in the bit line direction.

Both companies will likely squeeze as much as they can out of planar technology, and stand to gain from any delays in Samsung's ramp.

Why 3D?
There's a physical limit to developing flash memory cells, and the cost reduction from approaching that limit is not as great as earlier leaps in technology. As returns on investment diminish for planar memory chips, chipmakers turned to stacking NAND strings vertically on top of each other. In this way, they can cram more transistors onto one die, thus reducing the cost per bit.

But 3D isn't more cost effective yet. Samsung's first iteration that it started producing in August of last year featured 24 layers of stacked cells. The process uses just a 40nm node (Micron and SanDisk are using 19nm), so there's room for improvement using a smaller node. But, the next generation of cell stacking is where significant cost reduction will come in, as 24 layers grow to 32 layers or more.

As a result, analysts and insiders don't expect for cost crossover to occur until the second half of 2015. At an analyst conference, Micron's VP of R&D said, "Now, when we look at the projection, we think it's more like a second half of 2015 story when [3D NAND] actually starts becoming something significant in the market place. And a lot of that is, again, driven by the fact that planar technology is cost competitive."

Cost first
SanDisk is focused on cost first, which means squeezing its node size down to the smallest possible where it still gets cost improvements. That will likely end with its 1Z technology, which is expected to be 16nm, before the company transitions to 3D manufacturing.

3D is more expensive to produce because it's more difficult to check a cell's operations when it's buried under a bunch of other cells. The process also requires additional specialty equipment to fabricate chips.

As a result, SanDisk believes it can get a better return on investment through 2D NAND over an early transition to 3D NAND. On the company's fourth-quarter earnings call CEO Sanjay Mehrotra said, "We really believe that as long as you can extend the 2D NAND life, it is in the best interest in terms of ROI and in terms of really applying that technology across a broad range of industry applications."

The company's timeline for introducing 3D NAND remains in the second half of 2015, the same time cost-crossover is expected, and in the meantime leads the industry with the lowest-cost planar solution.

A little breathing room
Samsung's 3D NAND technology might be first to market, but it might not be seeing the demand Samsung initially anticipated. It's not a big part of its flash business, let alone entire business, but it was a threat to flash memory makers that are slower to transition like SanDisk.

SanDisk's core business looks to have a bit breathing room on pricing with Samsung unable to make as big of a dent in the market with 3D NAND. The company will continue to face pressure on its pricing, however, as 3D technology costs move closer to planar costs.

The real test will be in a year and a half when SanDisk needs to manage its own transition to 3D NAND.

More compelling ideas from The Motley Fool
As every savvy investor knows, Warren Buffett didn't make billions by betting on half-baked stocks. He isolated his best few ideas, bet big, and rode them to riches, hardly ever selling. You deserve the same. That's why our CEO, legendary investor Tom Gardner, has permitted us to reveal The Motley Fool's 3 Stocks to Own Forever. These picks are free today! Just click here now to uncover the three companies we love. 


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 24, 2014, at 4:48 PM, andyjan wrote:

    Adam - Thanks for an insightful article. Remember that the 3D NAND approaches being touted by Samsung (V-NAND) and SanDisk (p-BiCS originally from Toshiba) are essentially very similar with the same cost challenges and technical hurdles (with a few second order differences). If you want to understand the less-than-enthusiastic comments from the high-ups in Micron and SanDisk, your readers might like to read some more skeptical articles (written by me) with one being a peer-reviewed IEEE publication free to download:

    http://bit.ly/1m6ef0g - Samsung's V-NAND

    http://bit.ly/17c1DPw - 3D NAND analysis

    http://bit.ly/1imVpBb - IEEE 3D NAND cost analysis

    Best Regards

    Andy Walker

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2851021, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/26/2014 1:30:52 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement