The Truth Behind the Solar Tariff Debate

The media wants to be up in arms about potential U.S. solar tariffs, but at the end of the day, they probably don't matter.

Feb 24, 2014 at 1:00PM

The potential U.S.-China trade war over solar panels picked up steam again last week when Slate's article titled "The World's Dumbest Trade War" got play from outlets like Marketwatch and others across the Internet.

It's easy to say that slapping additional tariffs on imported Chinese solar panels would be terrible for the U.S., making it more costly to install solar, raising costs for the likes of SolarCity (NASDAQ:SCTY), while helping manufacturers like SunPower (NASDAQ:SPWR) and First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR). But the debate being had in Washington and across the industry is far more nuanced than one input and one output. Let's take a look at where the debate stands and what the impact on the solar industry will be if further tariffs are put in place.

Scty Installers

SolarCity workers installing a residential solar system. Image courtesy of SolarCity.

What tariffs are being debates?
Before we get into the pros and cons of solar tariffs, it's important to understand what tariffs we're debating. The first tariff put in place were a 2.9% to 4.73% anti-subsidy and a 31.14% to 249.96% anti-dumping tariff put on Chinese manufacturers who exported solar cells to the U.S. The level of the tariff depended on the company.

What followed was a retaliatory 60.2% to 63.5% anti-dumping tariff on U.S. makers of polysilicon, a raw material for solar cells. 

The problem with the initial tariffs as written is that U.S. tariffs were limited to solar cells, not the entire module or other components, leaving a huge loophole. Chinese manufacturers were able to overcome the tariff by "tolling" or installing some final components in Taiwan or another country and then shipping panels to the U.S.

The result is almost no impact to sales by Chinese solar manufacturers in the U.S. That's why recently, SolarWorld, who originally brought the complaint and is really a German company doing business in the U.S., sought to close the loophole by making the tariff broader to include panels and other components. Therein lies the contention Slate and even the Solar Energy Industries Association have with expanding solar tariffs because, hypothetically, it would increase the cost of solar, which now employs 140,000 Americans.

The impact of higher tariffs
The thought is that higher tariffs would raise costs and therefore kill the residential, commercial, and utility-scale solar industry. Without looking at where costs come from in solar, it's easy to make this conclusion, as Slate does. But if we look at the actual cost inputs of solar in the U.S., we find that tariffs might not be bad after all.

Spwr California Valley Solar Ranch

SunPower workers installing panels at the 250 MW California Valley Solar Ranch project. Image courtesy of SunPower.

According to GTM Research, the cost of a residential solar system in the U.S. was $4.72 per watt in Q3 of 2013. At the same time, a solar panel cost about $0.65 per watt, or about 14% of the entire installation's cost.

Let's say that panel costs go up 20% because of tariffs and a shift to higher-cost suppliers, making the average panel about $0.78 per watt. The total system cost would go up a whopping 2.8% to $4.85 per watt. Considering that acquisition costs for a new residential customer are about $0.50 per watt, I'd say that there's more opportunity to cut costs in acquiring customers than any potential loss from a solar tariff. In any case, this would set normal industry cost cutting back a couple of months.

If we look at utility scale systems, which account for more than half of the installations in the U.S., GTM Research says that system costs average $2.04 per watt. And who dominates utility solar in the U.S.? First Solar and SunPower, who are both U.S. companies and don't manufacture in China. 

The impact of tariffs would likely be much smaller than Slate or anyone else assumes, in large part because Chinese panels aren't the sole driver of the growing solar industry in the U.S. 

China retaliation would hurt itself
The other thing that goes unnoticed in the trade war is that the U.S. actually makes a significant amount of polysilicon for China. The U.S., South Korea, and Europe, who are all in the midst of a solar tariff battle, make 80% of the silicon China uses.

In other words, additional tariffs on polysilicon actually hurt Chinese manufacturers.

Would a trade war really kill solar?
While it's easy to get up in arms over solar tariffs and assume it would kill the U.S. solar industry, reality is more nuanced than that. China does sell a significant number of solar panels in the U.S. but so do U.S. companies SunPower and First Solar as well as Japanese companies Kyocera, Sharp, and a variety of other manufacturers. If tariffs are placed on Chinese solar panels, it would likely just shift where panels come from, not eliminate the industry altogether.

In addition, as the cost of solar panels have fallen, its efficiency, not cost, becomes more important (click here to see an article explaining why). And according to GT Advanced Technologies (NASDAQOTH:GTATQ), which supplies polysilicon and PV equipment that Chinese manufacturers have used to expand production, next-generation equipment demand is coming from Eastern Europe and the Middle East, not China. 

To sum all of this up, there are suppliers outside of China who would be more than willing to supply panels to residential solar installers, many of whom are already big players in the market, and commercial and utility installations wouldn't be affected much at all. There may be a small increase in prices but even 20% increase in panel costs, which was my example above, would only set industry cost reductions back a few months.

The U.S. solar market isn't nearly as dependent on China as the media makes it out to be. Additional tariffs would have very little impact on the industry long term.

Who is right in this debate?
The truth of the matter is that the stance you'll take in this debate depends on where you sit. Manufacturers like SunPower and First Solar would love to see tariffs increase because it would only expand margins in the U.S., where they're already head and shoulders above Chinese competitors.

If you're SolarCity, you want to see panels as cheap as possible because you're a buyer and are trying to lower costs as much as possible. Whether or not the subsidies given to solar manufacturers are "fair" or not are meaningless to you.

However, for all of these companies, a tariff isn't a game changer. 

Foolish bottom line
I don't know whether or not tariffs will change, but I don't see a lot of impact on the industry either way. I would be comfortable owning First Solar, SunPower, or SolarCity no matter what happens and they pose less risk than highly leveraged Chinese installers anyway.

What we shouldn't do is overreact to this tariff debate because it's already too late to kill the U.S. solar industry. The train has left the station and whether module supplies come from China, Japan, Malaysia, or the U.S., the industry has a very bright future.

Three ways to play the future of U.S. energy
The U.S. is quickly becoming an energy powerhouse and The Motley Fool is offering a comprehensive look at three energy companies set to soar as the industry evolves. To find out which three companies are spreading their wings, check out the special free report, "3 Stocks for the American Energy Bonanza." Don't miss out on this timely opportunity; click here to access your report -- it's absolutely free. 

Travis Hoium manages an account that owns shares of SunPower and personally owns shares and has the following options: long January 2015 $5 calls on SunPower, long January 2015 $7 calls on SunPower, long January 2015 $15 calls on SunPower, long January 2015 $25 calls on SunPower, and long January 2015 $40 calls on SunPower. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of SolarCity. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

1 Key Step to Get Rich

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better. Whether that’s helping people overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we can help.

Feb 1, 2016 at 4:54PM

To be perfectly clear, this is not a get-rich action that my Foolish colleagues and I came up with. But we wouldn't argue with the approach.

A 2015 Business Insider article titled, "11 websites to bookmark if you want to get rich" rated The Motley Fool as the #1 place online to get smarter about investing.

"The Motley Fool aims to build a strong investment community, which it does by providing a variety of resources: the website, books, a newspaper column, a radio [show], and [newsletters]," wrote (the clearly insightful and talented) money reporter Kathleen Elkins. "This site has something for every type of investor, from basic lessons for beginners to investing commentary on mutual funds, stock sectors, and value for the more advanced."

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better, so it's nice to receive that kind of recognition. It lets us know we're doing our job.

Whether that's helping the entirely uninitiated overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we want to provide our readers with a boost to the next step on their journey to financial independence.

Articles and beyond

As Business Insider wrote, there are a number of resources available from the Fool for investors of all levels and styles.

In addition to the dozens of free articles we publish every day on our website, I want to highlight two must-see spots in your tour of

For the beginning investor

Investing can seem like a Big Deal to those who have yet to buy their first stock. Many investment professionals try to infuse the conversation with jargon in order to deter individual investors from tackling it on their own (and to justify their often sky-high fees).

But the individual investor can beat the market. The real secret to investing is that it doesn't take tons of money, endless hours, or super-secret formulas that only experts possess.

That's why we created a best-selling guide that walks investors-to-be through everything they need to know to get started. And because we're so dedicated to our mission, we've made that available for free.

If you're just starting out (or want to help out someone who is), go to, drop in your email address, and you'll be able to instantly access the quick-read guide ... for free.

For the listener

Whether it's on the stationary exercise bike or during my daily commute, I spend a lot of time going nowhere. But I've found a way to make that time benefit me.

The Motley Fool offers five podcasts that I refer to as "binge-worthy financial information."

Motley Fool Money features a team of our analysts discussing the week's top business and investing stories, interviews, and an inside look at the stocks on our radar. It's also featured on several dozen radio stations across the country.

The hosts of Motley Fool Answers challenge the conventional wisdom on life's biggest financial issues to reveal what you really need to know to make smart money moves.

David Gardner, co-founder of The Motley Fool, is among the most respected and trusted sources on investing. And he's the host of Rule Breaker Investing, in which he shares his insights into today's most innovative and disruptive companies ... and how to profit from them.

Market Foolery is our daily look at stocks in the news, as well as the top business and investing stories.

And Industry Focus offers a deeper dive into a specific industry and the stories making headlines. Healthcare, technology, energy, consumer goods, and other industries take turns in the spotlight.

They're all informative, entertaining, and eminently listenable ... and I don't say that simply because the hosts all sit within a Nerf-gun shot of my desk. Rule Breaker Investing and Answers contain timeless advice, so you might want to go back to the beginning with those. The other three take their cues from the market, so you'll want to listen to the most recent first. All are available at

But wait, there's more

The book and the podcasts – both free ... both awesome – also come with an ongoing benefit. If you download the book, or if you enter your email address in the magical box at the podcasts page, you'll get ongoing market coverage sent straight to your inbox.

Investor Insights is valuable and enjoyable coverage of everything from macroeconomic events to investing strategies to our analyst's travels around the world to find the next big thing. Also free.

Get the book. Listen to a podcast. Sign up for Investor Insights. I'm not saying that any of those things will make you rich ... but Business Insider seems to think so.

Compare Brokers