Black Widow and Wonder Woman -- Which Will Stand Alone?

There has never been a better time for solo films built around big name comic book heroines. Who will be the first superwoman to conquer the silver screen?

Feb 25, 2014 at 4:20PM

Screen Shot

Source: dccomics.com

The age of the male-dominated superhero movie is over. The success of films like The Hunger Games has prompted Hollywood to rethink its traditional blockbuster formula. As production budgets for tentpole films continue to expand, it only makes sense that studios would seek to broaden the appeal of their slates and reach a newly defined and expanded audience.

With The Avengers: Age of Ultron coming from Disney (NYSE:DIS) in 2015 and Time Warner (NYSE:TWX) hoping to quickly assemble the Justice League in the next three years, it might be tempting to overlook another battle that's brewing. Disney's Black Widow will be going up against Warner's Wonder Woman in a contest to establish the first successful female superhero solo film. The stakes are high. Who is more likely to create the right property and drive the ongoing superhero phenomenon?

That was then...
Female superheroes have been a notoriously tough sell in the film business. The last big comic adaptations to be driven by a lead with two X chromosomes were Catwoman and Elektra. These films bombed with audiences and critics alike and sent the message that filmgoers were only interested in male-driven superhero pics. In 2007, former head of Warner's film outfit Jeff Robinov even stated that his company was not interested in producing movies with a female lead. Robinov is no longer at Warner and the industry has changed substantially since that decree.

Black Widow vs. Hawkeye
Talk of a solo film for Marvel's Black Widow began swirling in 2012. The character, portrayed by Scarlett Johansson, played an integral role in connecting the narratives within "The Avengers" universe. Now that Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, and The Hulk have received multiple solo film outings, giving Black Widow a shot at center stage is the next logical move. Such a film would certainly have more promise than a Jeremy Renner-driven "Hawkeye." The cultural iron has never been hotter for superwomen. Renner's star, on the other hand, has faded quickly.

What a woman
Warner's ability to challenge The Avengers' box office supremacy with its Justice League may be on shaky ground, but the company has a great opportunity with Wonder Woman. In terms of character popularity and name recognition, DC's famed Amazon warrior dwarfs Black Widow many times over. In fact, Wonder Woman stands as the most visible female in the pantheon of superheroes. 

Actress Gal Gadot (most known for her work in the "Fast and the Furious" series) has been contracted to play Wonder Woman in at least three films. The first of these will be the still untitled and recently delayed Batman vs. Superman project. After this introduction, the character is set to play a big role in 2017's Justice League and receive solo film treatment.

A battle of dames, names, and timeframes 

Screen Shot

 Source: marvel.com

Scarlett Johansson is certainly a bigger name than Gal Gadot, but that does not mean that a Black Widow film would outperform Warner's superwoman. Both Catwoman and Elektra featured leading ladies near the peak of their fame and both films cratered miserably. Disney's Widow project enjoys an edge over the lasso-wielding Justice Leaguer because the "Avengers" universe has already been successfully established. With Batman vs. Superman pushed into 2016, Warner will at least have more time to get Wonder Woman right. The studio will need it.

A question of tone
Producers and scriptwriters have struggled with bringing Wonder Woman to the big screen for decades. Invisible jets and magic lassos may be right at home on comic book pages or in animated movies, but live-action adaptations are much trickier. The traditional image and character of Wonder Woman don't seem to be an immediate fit for director Zach Snyder's dark and gritty Superman universe. Meanwhile, Johannsson's Black Widow has already been introduced as a natural and integral component of the Avengers.

Stick it to the man
These solo superwoman projects carry high degrees of risk and reward for their makers. Both movies might seem like surefire hits, but lackluster films would damage multiple brands and once again raise doubts about the viability of female-led superhero films. On the other hand, the first studio to successfully launch a comic book heroine on the big screen will achieve a milestone and open up the possibility for big things to come. It would be a particularly notable achievement for Warner, a company not long removed from the days of Jeff Robinov and his much criticized greenlighting criteria.

Screen Shot

Source: dccomics.com

Wonder Woman is Warner's X-factor

With the right lead in and marketing, Wonder Woman films have the potential to become billion-dollar earners while also strengthening the draw of Justice League outings. There is less of this explosive potential in Black Widow, but underestimating Marvel films has proven to be a fool's errand. It's also worth noting that a bad Wonder Woman film would do more damage to Warner's Justice League ambitions than a poor Black Widow film would do to The Avengers property. 

Who would you want in your corner?
Which super project winds up being more successful will likely hinge on two factors: strength of brand and quality of product. The successful track record of films in the "Avengers" universe suggests that Black Widow would have a better chance of being an audience pleaser. That said, even with the substantial groundwork laid by films in the "Avengers" series, there's more potential in the Wonder Woman character. If Warner can deliver an engaging film, it should have a big hit on its hands.

The moment is right for superheroine epics, and Wonder Woman looks to score bonus points if she can beat Black Widow to the punch.

Wonder Woman and Black Widow are pawns in this massive struggle...

While superheroes battle it out at the box office, an even bigger war is heating up. You know cable's going away. But do you know how to profit? There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Currently, cable grabs a big piece of it. That won't last. And when cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They're not Netflix, Google, and Apple.

Keith Noonan has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

1 Key Step to Get Rich

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better. Whether that’s helping people overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we can help.

Feb 1, 2016 at 4:54PM

To be perfectly clear, this is not a get-rich action that my Foolish colleagues and I came up with. But we wouldn't argue with the approach.

A 2015 Business Insider article titled, "11 websites to bookmark if you want to get rich" rated The Motley Fool as the #1 place online to get smarter about investing.

"The Motley Fool aims to build a strong investment community, which it does by providing a variety of resources: the website, books, a newspaper column, a radio [show], and [newsletters]," wrote (the clearly insightful and talented) money reporter Kathleen Elkins. "This site has something for every type of investor, from basic lessons for beginners to investing commentary on mutual funds, stock sectors, and value for the more advanced."

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better, so it's nice to receive that kind of recognition. It lets us know we're doing our job.

Whether that's helping the entirely uninitiated overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we want to provide our readers with a boost to the next step on their journey to financial independence.

Articles and beyond

As Business Insider wrote, there are a number of resources available from the Fool for investors of all levels and styles.

In addition to the dozens of free articles we publish every day on our website, I want to highlight two must-see spots in your tour of fool.com.

For the beginning investor

Investing can seem like a Big Deal to those who have yet to buy their first stock. Many investment professionals try to infuse the conversation with jargon in order to deter individual investors from tackling it on their own (and to justify their often sky-high fees).

But the individual investor can beat the market. The real secret to investing is that it doesn't take tons of money, endless hours, or super-secret formulas that only experts possess.

That's why we created a best-selling guide that walks investors-to-be through everything they need to know to get started. And because we're so dedicated to our mission, we've made that available for free.

If you're just starting out (or want to help out someone who is), go to www.fool.com/beginners, drop in your email address, and you'll be able to instantly access the quick-read guide ... for free.

For the listener

Whether it's on the stationary exercise bike or during my daily commute, I spend a lot of time going nowhere. But I've found a way to make that time benefit me.

The Motley Fool offers five podcasts that I refer to as "binge-worthy financial information."

Motley Fool Money features a team of our analysts discussing the week's top business and investing stories, interviews, and an inside look at the stocks on our radar. It's also featured on several dozen radio stations across the country.

The hosts of Motley Fool Answers challenge the conventional wisdom on life's biggest financial issues to reveal what you really need to know to make smart money moves.

David Gardner, co-founder of The Motley Fool, is among the most respected and trusted sources on investing. And he's the host of Rule Breaker Investing, in which he shares his insights into today's most innovative and disruptive companies ... and how to profit from them.

Market Foolery is our daily look at stocks in the news, as well as the top business and investing stories.

And Industry Focus offers a deeper dive into a specific industry and the stories making headlines. Healthcare, technology, energy, consumer goods, and other industries take turns in the spotlight.

They're all informative, entertaining, and eminently listenable ... and I don't say that simply because the hosts all sit within a Nerf-gun shot of my desk. Rule Breaker Investing and Answers contain timeless advice, so you might want to go back to the beginning with those. The other three take their cues from the market, so you'll want to listen to the most recent first. All are available at www.fool.com/podcasts.

But wait, there's more

The book and the podcasts – both free ... both awesome – also come with an ongoing benefit. If you download the book, or if you enter your email address in the magical box at the podcasts page, you'll get ongoing market coverage sent straight to your inbox.

Investor Insights is valuable and enjoyable coverage of everything from macroeconomic events to investing strategies to our analyst's travels around the world to find the next big thing. Also free.

Get the book. Listen to a podcast. Sign up for Investor Insights. I'm not saying that any of those things will make you rich ... but Business Insider seems to think so.


Compare Brokers