Is Chesapeake Energy Corporation About to Repeat its Biggest Mistake?

Photo credit: Chesapeake Energy Corporation 

The Haynesville Shale was once one of the hottest new natural gas plays. Because of that, companies like Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE: CHK  ) poured billions of dollars into the play, causing gas production to surge. The problem was that once the bubble burst on gas prices, so did the enthusiasm for the Haynesville Shale.

Things got so bad for Chesapeake Energy that the Haynesville Shale was one of the areas where it sold acreage in order to bridge its funding gap. Last year it unloaded 5,600 net acres in the Haynesville to EXCO Resources Inc (NYSE: XCO  ) for $320 million. The deal included interests in 170 wells that EXCO Resources already operated, as well as some drilling sections that Chesapeake Energy operated. While the deal made sense for both companies at the time, Chesapeake Energy was still viewed as a forced seller, suggesting that it didn't get as good a price as it could if it waited until natural gas recovered.

A turnaround is under way
Now that we are seeing a recovery in natural gas prices, we're seeing a bit of Chesapeake Energy's enthusiasm for the Haynesville Shale return. Chesapeake Energy, which discovered the Haynesville Shale in 2008, is returning its attention to growing production from the play. The company noted earlier this month that it was planning to spend 10% of its capital budget to fund seven to nine rigs in the play. That's a 25% increase from last year. It's a plan that had analysts scratching their heads and investors wondering if the company is about to repeat its past mistake.

 

Photo credit: Chesapeake Energy

On the conference call with analysts, one noted that the company gets better returns in the Marcellus Shale, which made him wonder why the company would now turn its attention to the Haynesville. Chesapeake Energy CEO Doug Lawler, however, reminded everyone that the "Haynesville asset is just simply a world class." However, he also noted that it has not yet been optimized the way the industry has optimized other plays. Because of this he sees the opportunity to see significant cost improvements and therefore higher returns. For Chesapeake Energy that makes the Haynesville Shale a much more competitive investment for the company than investors realize. 

Falling costs yield higher returns
Chesapeake Energy believes it can get its drilling costs down to $7.9 million per well this year. That's 23% less than the $10.3 million cost per well it spent just two years ago. The use of multi-well pad drilling will play a big factor in bringing these costs.

With a little more work the company likely could get those well costs down even further. EXCO Resources, for example, achieved record low average drilling costs of $7.5 million per well in the third quarter. Lower well costs, when combined with wells that are producing higher volumes, can indeed produce solid returns. For example, a natural gas price of $5.00/mcf could yield a return over 100% with well costs of $7.9 million for Chesapeake Energy.

Why this might not be a mistake
While natural gas prices are high now thanks to the rough winter experienced by much of the U.S., one bad winter isn't exactly a long-term trend. What is a developing long-term trend is natural gas exports, with Cheniere Energy  (NYSEMKT: LNG  ) expected to begin exporting natural gas from its Sabine Pass LNG terminal late next year. That terminal just happens to be located in Louisiana, the same state as the Haynesville Shale.

 

Cheniere Energy Sabine Pass LNG. Photo credit: Flickr/Roy Luck

There are a number of LNG export facilities planned along the Gulf Coast, including a second facility by Cheniere Energy in Corpus Christi. These facilities will need to be supplied with natural gas, with the Haynesville Shale being strategically located to benefit from exports. This suggests that Chesapeake Energy and even EXCO Resources could benefit from investing in the Haynesville to ramp up production ahead of these facilities being built.

Investor takeaway
The Chesapeake Energy of today is a much different company than the one that went all in on natural gas a few years ago. Today the company is investing within its cash flow and keeping its costs down. That's why I don't see the company's move to invest to grow its gas production from the Haynesville Shale being a repeat of a previous mistake.

The U.S. is taking on OPEC, and winning
While natural gas is changing America's future, it has been tough for investors to make money off of it. However, imagine a company that rents a very specific and valuable piece of machinery for $41,000... per hour (that's almost as much as the average American makes in a year!). And Warren Buffett is so confident in this company's can't-live-without-it business model, he just loaded up on 8.8 million shares. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report reveals the company we're calling OPEC's Worst Nightmare. Just click HERE to uncover the name of this industry-leading stock... and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable LANDSLIDE of profits!


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 25, 2014, at 9:44 PM, quasimodo007 wrote:

    this company is Very arrogant and it is just like a EVIL GOp congress Mafia style GREEDY Privilege CROOK to consumers while the CEO gets huge Multi Millions dollars bonuses at Consumers Expense.

  • Report this Comment On February 26, 2014, at 12:51 PM, gimtagel wrote:

    Boardwalk Pipeline has a great deal of infrastructure in place at the Haynesville play. Do you think Boardwalk is in a position to benefit from the moves by CHK and LNG? BWP has recently been cut in half by an 80% reduction in it's distribution. Perhaps they are freeing up cash for to be able to invest in projects that take advantage of these new developments. Any thoughts?

  • Report this Comment On February 27, 2014, at 9:12 AM, TMFmd19 wrote:

    I haven't looked very closely at BWP in a while so I'll put that on my list. However, I know its well positioned to for the energy boom. Here's a link to a free report we have on the company: http://www.fool.com/fool/free-report/18/sa-nextenergyboom-sf...

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2854312, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2014 11:08:07 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement