Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



InterMune Inc. ASCENDs to Greatness

Third time is the charm for InterMune (NASDAQ: ITMN  ) . Of course, so was the first.

It was the middle trial that ended up delaying a U.S. approval for its lung drug Esbriet by five years.

Haven't been following biotech for that long? Let's get you caught up.

  • In 2009, the biotech said Esbriet helped patients in both trials, but only one of the two phase 3 trials in a lung disease called idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis demonstrated a statistically significant difference between Esbriet and placebo.
  • An FDA advisory committee voted 9-3 recommending approval of the drug.
  • The FDA ignored its outside advisors and rejected the drug.
  • EU regulators were more forgiving of the mixed data and approved Esbriet.

Source: InterMune.

InterMune went back to the drawing board, designing a new clinical trial, dubbed ASCEND, with more patients than the first two trials to improve the chances of showing statistical significance. The company also measured efficacy at 52 weeks rather than 72 weeks in the previous trials, because the trials showed a treatment effect at 48 weeks, but then the placebo group didn't decline as fast as the Esbriet group so, by 72 weeks, the difference wasn't statistically significant. InterMune also tweaked the primary endpoint; instead of comparing the relative decline in lung capacity -- called percent predicted forced vital capacity, or FVC -- the new trial measured how many patients saw a 10% decline in FVC, which is clinically meaningful.

The changes worked. Big time.

After a year on the drug, 16.5% of patients experienced an FVC decline of 10% or more (patients that died were also included) compared to 31.8% of patients that took placebo. The difference had a p-value of less than 0.000001. Or in other words, there's a 0.0001% chance that the difference happened by chance alone.

Yeah, I'd call that statistically significant.

Ironically, the relative change in FVC was statistically significant as well, so InterMune didn't really have to change the endpoint. Of course, maybe that shouldn't be too surprising since Esbriet did pass one of the two trials with that endpoint.

InterMune plans to submit its new application to the FDA in the third quarter. As far as I can tell, the data looks good enough to get approved by the FDA this time around.

Was the FDA wrong?

In hindsight, at least.

The main argument at the advisory committee meeting seemed to be that there weren't any approved treatments for IPF, so why not just approve it despite the mixed data? As much as investors and companies would like, that's generally not how the FDA works.

While I hate defending the FDA's overly cautious stance, I think the agency was right to be careful with Esbriet considering how hard it's been to treat IPF. In the intervening five years since Esbriet's last trials, a trial for Gilead Sciences' (NASDAQ: GILD  ) ambrisentan was stopped because of lack of efficacy; Actelion Pharmaceuticals' Tracleer failed to show an effect in IPF, and so did Novartis' (NYSE: NVS  ) Gleevec. 

There was a report from an unnamed source that Boehringer Ingelheim's nintedanib has passed a phase 3 trial, but the company hasn't confirmed that, as far as I know. Both companies should report data at the American Thoracic Society in May, so we'll know soon enough who might win in the marketplace, assuming they're both approved.

Finding those revolutionary ideas before they're big
Most investors don't understand the key to investing in hyper-growth markets. The trick is to find a small-cap "pure-play," and then watch as it grows in EXPLOSIVE lock-step with it's industry. Our expert team of equity analysts has identified one stock that's poised to produce rocket-ship returns with the next $14.4 TRILLION industry. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening report.

Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2853825, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/29/2015 10:53:12 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Brian Orelli

Dr. Orelli is a Senior Biotech Specialist. He has written about biotech, pharmaceutical, and medical device companies for The Motley Fool since 2007.

Today's Market

updated 13 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,643.01 -11.76 -0.07%
S&P 500 1,988.87 1.21 0.06%
NASD 4,828.33 15.62 0.32%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

12/31/1969 7:00 PM
ITMN $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
InterMune CAPS Rating: **
GILD $107.78 Down -0.21 -0.19%
Gilead Sciences CAPS Rating: *****
NVS $98.35 Down -0.29 -0.29%
Novartis CAPS Rating: ****