Target Corporation Is Very Glad 2013 Is Over

Target came into 2013 with high hopes. Instead, it had one of the worst years in company history.

Feb 27, 2014 at 9:20AM

Even in the depths of the Great Recession, it didn't get this bad at Target (NYSE:TGT). In 2013, Target struggled through a series of humiliating blunders and guidance revisions. Full-year GAAP EPS of $3.07 was about 35% below the original guidance range of $4.70-$4.90. Net income of $1.97 billion was more than 10% below Target's $2.21 billion in net income from 2008, when the U.S. economy was in a tailspin.

Target's 2013 sales performance was fairly weak -- comparable-store sales declined 0.4% for the full year -- but this aspect of its performance was overshadowed by two big blunders.


Target just closed the books on one of its worst years ever.

First, Target underestimated the challenges of diving headfirst into the Canadian market, leading to big losses there. Second, Target's recent data breach, which compromised customers' credit cards and other personal information, caused a big loss of confidence in the retailer. Target's sales fell sharply after customers found out about this issue. Both of these problems could continue to cause headaches for Target in 2014 and beyond.

Target's Canadian dilemma
In early 2013, Target expected a relatively smooth launch for its 124 stores in Canada. The company's initial FY13 guidance called for $0.45 of EPS dilution from Canada, with half of that loss coming in the first quarter. Target expected to be profitable in Canada by year-end.

When Target finally closed the books on 2013, the company had a pre-tax loss of nearly $1 billion in Canada on sales of $1.3 billion. That caused EPS dilution of $1.13 for the full year.

So far, Target has had trouble changing Canadian shoppers' habits to drive frequent Target visits. This has led to weak sales performance, which in turn has caused a persistent inventory overhang. These problems culminated in severe clearance markdowns during Q4 that drove gross margin down to 4.4%. (30% is a typical gross margin rate for Target.)

On Target's recent earnings call, executives noted that the company managed to reduce inventory per store in Canada by 30% during the fourth quarter. That puts it in a much better position to reach a "normal" gross margin rate in 2014. Management also expects sales in Canada to double this year, as the Canadian stores were only open for a little more than half of 2013, on average.

However, that still won't get Target's Canadian operations anywhere close to breakeven. Based on the company's recent expense rate in Canada, Target would need to reach about $4 billion in sales to hit breakeven. In other words, even if sales double in 2014, Target would still need to drive 50% comparable-store sales growth to become profitable in Canada.


Target has a lot of work to do just to break even in Canada.

Target will probably be able to reduce that breakeven point a bit by optimizing its operating expenses over time as it gets more data on shopping patterns. Still, Target is years away from making money in Canada. The best investors can hope for in the meantime is that the losses will shrink each year.

The data breach: a big wild card
Before word got out that criminals managed to steal credit card numbers and other information from tens of millions of customers, Target was experiencing a solid fourth quarter. While many value-oriented retailers have been struggling recently, Target was tracking ahead of its guidance for flat comparable-store sales through mid-December.

However, the drop in sales following the data breach news caused Target to end the quarter with comparable-store sales down 2.5%. Comparable-store sales have rebounded to the flat line so far in February (compared to a weak February for retail sales in 2013). Still, it will take time for Target to completely overcome customers' fears and unhappiness. The company expects Q1 comparable-store sales to be down 0% to 2%.

It is impossible to predict how long it will take for Target to recover from the data breach. It's certainly plausible customers will decide to "forgive and forget" by the middle of the year. However, it's also possible it will take years to rebuild trust with customers, and Target may need to ramp up promotional activity in the meantime to drive store traffic.

Foolish final thoughts
Target is projecting Q1 adjusted EPS of $0.60-$0.75, compared to EPS of approximately $0.81 on the same basis in 2013. On the other hand, Target expects full-year EPS to grow more than 20% year over year to a range of $3.85-$4.15.

This guidance suggests Target is banking on meaningful improvements throughout the year. Even so, the midpoint of the guidance fell below what analysts had expected. Surprisingly, Target stock still managed to climb 7% on Wednesday. (Perhaps some investors feared the earnings results would be even worse than they were.)

TGT Chart

Target 3 Month Stock Chart, data by YCharts.

Target shares now trade for 15 times projected 2014 earnings. That seems reasonably cheap, assuming Target can quickly regain the trust of its U.S. customers while growing to profitability in Canada in the next two to three years. However, I would recommend waiting for Target to show it's making progress toward these two goals before jumping in. Target underestimated the challenges it would face in 2013, and it could be doing the same today.

Check out The Motley Fool's top dividend picks
One of the dirty secrets few finance professionals will openly admit is the fact that dividend stocks as a group handily outperform their non-dividend paying brethren. The reasons for this are too numerous to list here, but you can rest assured it's true. However, knowing this is only half the battle. The other half is identifying which dividend stocks in particular are the best. With this in mind, our top analysts put together a free list of nine high-yielding stocks that should be in every income investor's portfolio. To learn the identity of these stocks instantly and for free, all you have to do is click here now.

Adam Levine-Weinberg has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information