The Financial Media's Attacks are Refuted Once Again

Editor's Note; This article was updated and KMR was removed due to a misstatement about the role of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC. The Fool regrets the error

Barron's is at it again. This time, the finance publication has taken yet another opportunity to call Kinder Morgan, (NYSE: KMI  ) into question. Specifically, a recent article takes aim at the midstream asset operator Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (NYSE: KMP  ) . Barron's believes the partnership arm of the company has been misstating cash flow by understating its spending. The article caused both Kinder Morgan, and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners to lose billions in market value in a single day. 

But Kinder Morgan isn't sitting idly by. The company released a statement, carefully and clearly listing each of the arguments presented by Barron's and refuting them in lengthy detail. Importantly, Kinder Morgan believes that many of its facts given to Barron's were not considered in the article. Here are the major bullet-points from Kinder Morgan's statement.

Kinder Morgan: We are not understating cash flow
The questions in the Barron's piece deal with Kinder Morgan's distributable cash flow, which is a non-GAAP comparable metric to free cash flow. This is often utilized by Master Limited Partnerships. Barron's calls into question how Kinder Morgan differentiates between growth capital expenditures versus maintenance capital expenditures.

Kinder Morgan acknowledges the disparity between the two measures. Its growth expenditures totaled $676 million last year while sustaining capex stood at just $14 million in the company's carbon dioxide segment. As Barron's believes, should Kinder Morgan be forced to more equitably split those expenses in that division, its distributable cash flow will greatly suffer.

Kinder Morgan flatly believes its sustaining capital expenditures are not understated. Management notes it has used this practice since 2003, and is widely understood by the investment community and priced into the company's valuation.

Next point: Distributions will be maintained if or when carbon dioxide DCF declines
Kinder Morgan's next argument is that it will be able to sustain its distributions with cash flow even if its cash flow from the carbon dioxide segment declines. To back this up, management cites Kinder Morgan's massive and diversified business model. Kinder Morgan's massive network of pipelines and storage terminals extends throughout the country and across the natural gas, oil, and refined product transportation and storage industries.

The oil production portion of its carbon dioxide division accounts for just 17% of the partnership's earnings before depreciation and amortization. In fact, Kinder Morgan states that Barron's questions around the carbon dioxide division involve just a $200 million potential decline in DCF in 2021, on a partnership that currently generates $4.4 billion in DCF.

Furthermore, it's a midstream operator, not an upstream exploration and production company, and as such, it's insulated against volatility in underlying commodities. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners operates much like a toll road that collects fees based on throughput volumes. To be sure, 80% of the partnership's cash flow is fee-based and over 90% of 2014 cash flow is either fee-based or hedged. That means that there will simply not be nearly as much volatility in Kinder Morgan's cash flow as the Barron's article implies.

Barron's article seems to be much ado about nothing
Essentially, the recent Barron's article is simply rehashing an old argument. Kinder Morgan has repeatedly and thoroughly refuted the arguments presented by Barron's. While everything that comes out of Kinder Morgan appears credible, it seems to a certain extent investors simply need to trust management. Kinder Morgan is a more than $100 billion company, including all of its various entities. It's easier to trust a company of this size, with its long and established track record.

Plus, trusting Kinder Morgan's statements are made easier by the fact that its Chief Executive Richard Kinder owns tens of millions worth of stock. He's putting his money where his mouth is, and for those reasons, I'll continue to keep my trust in Kinder Morgan and advise my fellow investors to do the same.

It's all about yield with MLPs and these other 9 companies

Dividend stocks, as a group, have historically outperformed their non-dividend paying brethren. The reasons for this are too numerous to list here, but you can rest assured that it’s true. However, knowing this is only half the battle. The other half is identifying which dividend stocks in particular are the best. With this in mind, our top analysts put together a free list of nine high-yielding stocks that should be in every income investor’s portfolio. To learn the identity of these stocks instantly and for free, all you have to do is click here now.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (10)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 28, 2014, at 1:42 PM, longinvest wrote:

    So where is the accountability for these uninformed analysts? It is criminal that a few uninformed and mislead statements can take billions out of peoples portfolios. Well done Kinder for rebuking these idiots. Long on KMP.

  • Report this Comment On February 28, 2014, at 1:45 PM, longinvest wrote:

    By the way, the drop makes it easier to buy more.

  • Report this Comment On March 01, 2014, at 7:50 AM, zugswang wrote:

    Agree longinvest. I guess there are quite a few investors who base their investing decisions on the rantings of one journalist who is looking to sell copy. Unfortunately the first "expose" of KMP 6 months ago was not the buying opp. This should be the buying opp now that all the sellers, who base their investments on the cover story of Barron's, are cleared out!

  • Report this Comment On March 03, 2014, at 2:22 AM, Sumflow wrote:

    The first was not 6 months ago. Kurt Wulff made the same claims about Kinder Morgan in 2003.

    See.. newspaper: http://goo.gl/Bpm3Lp

  • Report this Comment On March 06, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Interventizio wrote:

    Excellent Sumflow thank you A LOT for the link!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2858860, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2014 12:46:43 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement