Are ExxonMobil's Reduced Capital Expenditures Cause for Concern?

ExxonMobil, like Chevron and Royal Dutch Shell, will cut spending in 2014 after spending heavily over the past few years. That will make it tough to reverse last year's decline in production.

Mar 7, 2014 at 10:05AM

Oil and gas behemoth ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) upset the market on March 5 when it told analysts it would cut spending this year. The news was not well-received, and the company's shares fell hard on the day of the announcement. ExxonMobil is tightening its belt this year, and there are clear worries that there's a lack of suitable investment opportunities out there for the taking.

Reduced capital expenditures is a recurring theme going on right now across the oil and gas industry. Other global super-majors including Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE:RDS-B) are adopting similar strategies this year, so it's not as if this is an ExxonMobil-specific issue.

Still, ExxonMobil's oil-equivalent production fell last year. Investors were clearly hoping to see a turnaround in production this year, which will be very difficult now that ExxonMobil is cutting capital expenditures.

ExxonMobil's investment plan this year and beyond
In all, ExxonMobil expects to allocate $39.8 billion to capital expenditures in 2014. This represents a measurable decline from the more than $40 billion spent last year. ExxonMobil believes 2013 will represent a peak year for investment, particularly when it comes to acquisitions. ExxonMobil does not expect to pursue any acquisitions this year or through 2017.

ExxonMobil's budget restriction echoes what Chevron told its own investors. Chevron also expects to spend $39.8 billion in 2014. That would be a $2 billion reduction from 2013 expenditure levels. In the same vein as its bigger brother, Chevron told investors that 2013 would be a peak year for investments after making several resource acquisitions over the past few years, that would not recur in subsequent years. And, like Chevron, ExxonMobil will devote the vast majority to upstream projects, although ExxonMobil's budget will call for a decline in overall upstream spending.

Of course, ExxonMobil's upcoming budgetary restrictions are nothing compared to the axe Royal Dutch Shell is taking to its own spending. Shell plans to reduce capital expenditures by $9 billion in 2014, from $46 billion in 2013 to an estimated $37 billion this year. That represents a severe 20% drop, and calls into question whether Shell will report satisfactory production and cash flow over the next several years.

ExxonMobil and Chevron are projecting equal capital expenditures, but there's reason for ExxonMobil investors to be concerned considering the fact that ExxonMobil is a much bigger company than Chevron. ExxonMobil is almost twice as large as Chevron by market capitalization, so it's clear that ExxonMobil is really tightening its belt. Plus, ExxonMobil warns investors that longer-term spending will keep falling. It's going to hold capital expenditures at approximately $37 billion per year from 2015-2017.

Upstream feeling the effects
Not surprisingly, ExxonMobil doesn't see production improving this year. In fact, production is expected to be flat in 2014 after falling 1.5% last year, and will increase only 2%-3% per year from 2015-2017. A major contributor is lackluster gas production. High-margin liquids production is expected to rise 2% in 2014, but gas production is projected to drop by 2% this year.

ExxonMobil hopes to realize modest production growth through its existing projects, which should ramp-up this year and beyond after several years of intense investment. In all, ExxonMobil is pursuing more than 120 projects, 21 of which should reach start-up status by 2017. The majority of these will be concentrated in the Americas, spread across some of the highest-potential regions including the Permian Basin, the Bakken formation, and the Marcellus and Haynesville shale plays.

Nearer-term, ExxonMobil points investors to its 10 major project start-ups planned this year, which represents a company record. Management is clearly focused on developing the sizable amount of resources it's acquired over the past few years. Spending over the next few years will fall, but management is confident it can keep production going in the right direction thanks to its existing upstream projects. Pressure is on ExxonMobil to deliver, and time will tell if the decision to cut spending is a wise one.

These dividends compare with 9 other companies we approve of

Historically, dividend stocks, as a group, have outperformed their non-dividend paying brethren. The reasons for this are too numerous to list here, but you can rest assured that it’s true. However, knowing this is only half the battle. The other half is identifying which dividend stocks in particular are the best. With this in mind, our top analysts put together a free list of nine high-yielding stocks that should be in every income investor’s portfolio. To learn the identity of these stocks instantly and for free, all you have to do is click here now.

Bob Ciura has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Chevron. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information