The One Good Thing About General Motors' Massive Recall

Years of delays. Thirteen deaths. But GM's new leaders are determined to do the right thing.

Mar 9, 2014 at 12:31PM


General Motors CEO Mary Barra, shown here with former CEO Dan Akerson, says that GM will take an "unvarnished" look at the events that led to the recent recall of 1.6 million vehicles. Photo credit: General Motors.

Last month, General Motors (NYSE:GM) announced the recall of 1.6 million vehicles built between 2003 and 2007, for faulty ignition switches.

We at The Motley Fool often say that most auto recalls are no big deal in the grand scheme of things, and that's true. Nowadays, most recalls in the auto business involve a problem that could cause a safety issue. Typically, it's a defective part that is caught quickly -- often in the automaker's own internal testing -- and the comany is proactive in making sure it's repaired promptly. It's a nuisance for owners of the affected cars, and an expense and a hassle for the automaker, but rarely much more than that.

This is not one of those recalls.

The problem with these ignition switches is this: The impact of just the right kind of crash can make the switches switch from the "run" position to the "accessory" position. If the ignition switch isn't in the "run" position during a crash, the airbags won't go off. 

What are the odds of that happening? They're not zero: apparently, there have been 31 crashes in which this happened. Thirteen people have died.

That's bad. But it gets worse. GM has known about this problem for years. It fixed the switches in 2007. But the company didn't do a recall at the time.

Why? Good question. GM's legal department is now conducting an investigation to find out.

Of course, GM was in turmoil in 2007, and for several years after, as it spiraled into a wrenching bankruptcy. It's a different company now, under very different management. As Fool contributor John Rosevear explains in this video, the one good thing in this situation is that GM's new leadership is determined to find out what happened, to take responsibility for fixing it, and to make sure it doesn't happen again.

A transcript of the video is below.

Free report: Learn from Warren Buffett's greatest wisdom
Warren Buffett has made billions through his investing and he wants you to be able to invest like him. Through the years, Buffett has offered up investing tips to shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway. Now you can tap into the best of Warren Buffett's wisdom in a new special report from The Motley Fool. Click here now for a free copy of this invaluable report.

Hey Fools, it's John Rosevear. So you may have heard that General Motors has this enormous recall going on. The story in a nutshell is that they recalled 1.6 million older vehicles, these are all 2007 model year or older, Chevy Cobalts, Pontiac G5s, Chevy HHRs, Pontiac Solstices, and Saturn Skys, they've been recalled [for] faulty ignition switches.

The issue is that the switches can fail in a way that you'd never notice until you were in a huge crash and the car's airbags failed to deploy, basically, the switch's mechanism can become loose enough that it gets knocked into an "off" position, technically the "accessory" position, by the force of the crash, and of course airbags don't deploy when the car isn't switched on. There have apparently been 31 crashes where this actually happened, where investigators determined that the airbags in one of these affected GM vehicles should have inflated and they didn't, and 13 people have died.

As safety defects go in modern cars, this one's a doozy.

We often say that most recalls are no big deal, and that modern cars are very very safe, and that's true, but this one is a big deal. It's a big embarrassment for GM, a big potential liability, but it's interesting how GM has chosen to handle this.

GM is of course a very different company now than it was back in 2007; it has been through bankruptcy, and it's under completely different senior management that has taken a completely different approach, and I would argue a much much healthier approach. What's different, first of all, is that GM has made public a chronology that shows that the company first learned of the potential for a problem way back in 2004, they outlined the whole investigative process, and it shows that they probably should have done this recall in 2007 when they figured out what the issue was and implemented a change to the ignition switch design that solved the problem.

Just owning up to that is likely to land them in some legal hot water. I mean, it seems awfully likely that they'll get sued by some of the victims here, but in addition, it's a big violation of federal regulations. Automakers are required to tell the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration within five days if they become aware of a safety defect. The maximum penalty is a $35 million dollar fine.

It looks like what happened is that some balls got dropped within GM, which is somewhat understandable given all the massive internal turmoil that GM went through between 2007 and 2011 or so, but even though it's arguably understandable it's still bad. It really looks like GM as an institution kind of dragged its feet while people were getting killed and injured in defective cars.

But what's good about this, to the extent that there's anything good here, what's good is that GM's current leadership is finally stepping up and owning this. They did release the chronology, and GM North America chief Alan Batey actually apologized, he had a letter published in USA Today that apologizes for the defect and GM's slow response to it. Batey's letter says: "Today's General Motors places our customers' satisfaction and safety at the center of all we do. That is why we are deeply sorry for the events that led to our recent recall."

And he goes on to really take a shot at Old GM. He says, "It is fair that we are getting questions about our commitment to customers when you consider the way we did business and some of the vehicles we built at times during the past decade." Reuters reported on Wednesday that a team of GM attorneys is now conducting an internal investigation, questioning employees, a day after GM CEO Mary Barra sent a letter to employees saying that GM would take an "unvarnished" look at what happened.

I have to say, as a GM shareholder, I hate that this safety defect exists, I hate that it took them so long to deal with it, but I do like the way that GM is finally stepping up here. It's nice to see management trying hard to do the right thing. Thanks for watching, and Fool on.

John Rosevear owns shares of General Motors. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information