FDA Cholesterol Drug Concerns: What You Should Know

Sanofi, Regeneron, Amgen, and Pfizer get a little extra scrutiny on their new cholesterol drugs.

Mar 10, 2014 at 2:30PM

As Sanofi (NYSE:SNY) / Regeneron (NASDAQ:REGN), Pfizer (NYSE:PFE), and Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) prepare for the stretch run to getting their PCSK9 inhibitors, high-potential new treatments for cholesterol, approved by the FDA, a new potential complication has emerged. Sanofi and Regeneron revealed through SEC filings that the FDA is now taking a closer look at potential neurocognitive issues with the entire PCSK9 inhibitor class.

The odds still seem to favor the thesis that PCSK9 inhibitors are safe enough for FDA approval. That said, the role of cholesterol in neurocognitive process is significant, so it's not a ridiculous notion to investigate – particularly considering the possibility that many millions of people will be taking these drugs once they are approved and available.

In the middle of studies, almost all news is bad news
With the exception of prearranged data analyses that can stop a trial early due to overwhelming efficacy, almost any news on an experimental drug in between clinical trial updates is likely to be negative news. Sanofi and Regeneron sort of confirmed that notion when analysts and investors reading Sanofi's 20-F filing (filed on March 7, 2013), saw the following:

"Sanofi and Regeneron have been advised by the FDA that it has become aware of neurocognitive adverse events in the PCSK9 inhibitor class. Neurocognitive adverse events have also been associated with the use of statins for lowering LDL cholesterol. Neither company knows the circumstances under which the FDA became aware of these adverse events or whether these adverse events were observed with a drug candidate tested as monotherapy or in combination with a statin or other cholesterol-lowering agent. The FDA has requested that Sanofi and Regeneron make an assessment of potential neurocognitive adverse events across the global development program for alirocumab, especially in the longer-term studies. Additionally, the FDA requested to be informed about the feasibility of incorporating neurocognitive testing into at least a subset of patients in the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial or other long-term Phase III trial(s). While neither company is aware of any neurocognitive adverse event signal relating to alirocumab, if this or another adverse event signal is detected, the further development of alirocumab may be delayed or fail, or its commercial value diminished, which could severely harm future prospects."

As of this writing, there has been no official statement or comment from Amgen or Pfizer regarding this issue, so it may be the case that there was some sort of signal toward neurocognitive events in one of their studies. It's also important to note a key detail of that Sanofi text – namely, that this signal could have been observed in a combination study of a PCKS9 inhibitor and a statin. Neurocognitive adverse events are a known (albeit rare) risk of statins.

Caution seems prudent
At this point, it is hard to fault the FDA for being cautious and wanting more data. The FDA had previously sent a letter to companies developing PCKS9 drugs expressing some concern about long-term use of these drugs, as PCSK9 inhibition is known to reduce neuronal aptosis. What's more, as highlighted by Barclays analyst Ying Huang, the central nervous system accounts for about 2% of human bodyweight, but contains nearly one-quarter of the cholesterol in the body. Given the significant role of cholesterol in CNS functions, taking a closer look at the neurocognitive safety of this new drug class, particularly when millions could be taking the drugs, seems prudent at this point.

Outcomes may matter more than risk
There is certainly precedent for drugs making it through a Phase II study, only to see safety issues emerge in large-scale Phase III studies. Amgen has reported top-line Phase III results for its PCKS9 candidate, but it may be premature to declare them safe. There is also a risk that the FDA may ultimately require more meaningful testing on this issue prior to final approval (not unlike how the FDA basically sprung cardiovascular outcomes testing on the developers of diabetes and obesity drugs).

The bigger long-term concern could be in outcomes testing. There is incomplete data as to whether reducing cholesterol leads to improved long-term outcomes (lower rates of heart attack, stroke, etc.), and Merck's IMPROVE-IT study is going to be closely watched in that regard. Pfizer, Sanofi/Regeneron, and Amgen are all doing long-term outcomes studies (Pfizer's program arguably being the most ambitious), but the results won't be available for several years. Should it prove to be the case that PCKS9 inhibition doesn't actually lead to better long-term outcomes, that would be a far more damaging development to their commercial potential than a small risk of neurocognitive issues in some patients.

The bottom line
The argument can be made that this development hurts Sanofi most of all. Because of the nature of the deal with Regeneron, Sanofi needs alirocumab to generate strong revenue to really move the needle on its financials. That said, the ultimate impact to Sanofi, Regeneron, Pfizer and Amgen seems modest for now, but this issue is definitely going to come up again before this new class of drugs reaches the market.

3 stocks with growth independent of the FDA
It's no secret that investors tend to be impatient with the market, but the best investment strategy is to buy shares in solid businesses and keep them for the long term. In the special free report "3 Stocks That Will Help You Retire Rich," The Motley Fool shares investment ideas and strategies that could help you build wealth for years to come. Click here to grab your free copy today.

Stephen D. Simpson, CFA has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information