Why Getty's New Image-Sharing Plan Doesn't Threaten Shutterstock Inc

Getty said it would allow 35 million of its images to be used free for non-commercial purposes. Investors responded by sending shares of Shutterstock down nearly 10% -- but is it really a threat?

Mar 10, 2014 at 10:00AM

Shares of Shutterstock Inc (NYSE:SSTK) have fallen nearly 10% in the last two days following an announcement by rival Getty Images that it would make 35 million images available to online publishers for non-commercial purposes. Getty's decision came out of a desire to deflect piracy of its images as it acknowledged that many of its images are already being copied anyway. 

Investors seemed to interpret the move as a threat to Shutterstock, the imagery marketplace juggernaut that has seen shares jump over 300% since its 2012 IPO. Founded in 2003, Shutterstock now has over 30 million photos and a million videos in its database, and the site is available in 20 languages. Those Images aren't cheap, starting at $29 for 2, or a yearly subscription goes for $2559. Getty Images, by comparison, has 150 million photos available for licensing, which are similarly priced.

The price tag on these images should indicate that Getty is dealing with two lines of business, here. Like other "freemium" models, the free images are meant as an ad for Getty, a way to get some of the images out, and to serve as its own means of advertising and data collection. Getty is not just dumping free images on the Internet -- that would undermine its own business. After all, these companies cater to big media enterprises, ad agencies, and marketing departments -- businesses who need quality imagery and can afford to use it. As Shutterstock CEO Jon Oringer said of Getty's decision, "It's not very landscape-changing at all. You can't use their images for commercial use and 99.9% of our business is commercial use. We sell to businesses who sell other stuff, so we're just going to concentrate on doing that."

Getty's new policy does allow media companies to use free images, but Getty retains the right to place ads on the images or use them to collect user data, making companies unlikely to use them for free. The plan could even backfire as the decision has upset photographers who don't want their images used free for only Getty's benefit, and that could drive more of them to develop relationships with other buyers such as Shutterstock. 

Time to stock up on Shutterstock?
Commenting on the stock's latest dip, Oringer said he was unconcerned, and that, in fact, he didn't even know if Getty's move was the reason for the drop. "We easily go up and down this amount on days where there is no news," he said. "But short-term jumps don't really matter when you're building a company that will be around for decades." That statement should help calm any concerns Shutterstock investors may have about the stock getting pumped up too high. At a P/E of 121, it would be easy to say the stock is "priced to perfection," but Oringer seems to have his mind in the right place: focused on the long-term growth of the business. And the company is continuing to grow at a rapid pace, adding over 250,000 images in the last week alone. 

Online media is only growing in importance and usage, and Shutterstock appears to have a strong foothold in this niche businees, which should only grow deeper as the company becomes more established, and digital communication becomes more pervasive. A recent partnership with Facebook, in which the social network giant is offering 25 million of Shutterstock's photos free to its advertisers, shows off just one of the many unexpected opportunities available for the imagery marketplace. Analysts are expecting a 30% growth rate for the current year, and with the potential of new opportunities like the Facebook partnership, there are plenty of ways Shutterstock could beat that mark. Given the growing importance of digital media as online communications come to predominate, I'd expect many good years ahead for Shutterstock. 

More top-notch growth picks
Shutterstock has returned over 300% to early investors, but that's nothing for Motley Fool co-Founder David Gardner. He's found stocks with returns like 926%, 2,239%, and 4,371%. In fact, just recently one of his favorite stocks became a 100-bagger, and he's ready to do it again. You can uncover his scientific approach to crushing the market and his six carefully chosen six picks for ultimate growth instantly, because he's making this premium report free for you today. Click here now for access.

Jeremy Bowman owns shares of Shutterstock Inc. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers