This Department Store Looks Like a Buying Opportunity

Source: Macy's.

Macy's (NYSE: M  ) is materially outperforming competitors, be it companies facing difficulties and trying to turn their business around, like J.C. Penney (NYSE: JCP  ) and Sears (NASDAQ: SHLD  ) , or more solid players like Kohl's (NYSE: KSS  ) and Dillard's (NYSE: DDS  ) . Interestingly, the stock is trading at similar valuation levels to those of its peers, so Macy's looks like it might be a buying opportunity for investors. Let's take a closer look.

A high-quality company
Macy's has emerged stronger than ever from the great recession in 2008 and 2009. The company has taken a series of initiatives like relying on private-level offerings, efficient inventory management, and price optimization to deliver the right products to its customers in the desired way. 

In addition, Macy's is focused on providing a differentiated experience for customers via a strategy that management calls MOM: My Macy's localization, Omnichannel integration, and Magic Selling. The company has been a leader in terms of adapting to a changing retail environment, and this is being reflected in its financial performance.

Macy's reported an increase of 2.3% in comparable sales, including departments licensed to third parties, during the 13 weeks ending on Feb. 1. The holiday season was particularly strong at Macy's, with an increase of 4.3% in comparable sales including departments licensed to third parties in the combined November and December period.

Adjusted diluted earnings per share came in at $2.31 during the quarter, materially better that the $2.17 forecast on average by Wall Street analysts and representing a strong increase of 13% versus the $2.05 the company reported in adjusted earnings per share for the fourth quarter of 2012.

A challenging industry
J.C. Penney has recently caught a lot of attention from investors after the company announced a better-than-expected increase of 2% in comparable-store sales during the fourth quarter of 2013. The company has been suffering from declining sales over the last several years, so it's far too soon to tell if this is only a short-term rebound or the beginning of a viable turnaround.

J.C. Penney continues losing money, and the company carries considerable debt on its balance sheet, so it's a far riskier investment proposition than Macy's.

Sears is materially worse than J.C. Penney; sales are falling from a cliff with domestic comparable-store sales falling by 6.4% during the last quarter of 2013. When it comes to Sears, there is not much reason for optimism until the company manages to at least stabilize performance.

Kohl's managed to beat earnings estimates during the last quarter, but comparable sales declined by 2% during the period. During fiscal 2014, management is expecting comparable sales to be between flat and a 2% increase. The company is doing a sound job going through the difficult scenario, but profitability will likely remain under pressure in the coming quarters due to pricing discounts to sustain sales volumes.

Dillard's reported a 2% increase in comparable-store sales during the quarter ended on Feb. 1, but gross margin from retail operations declined 180 basis points to 32.8% of sales as the company is resorting to discounts in the face of a challenging competitive landscape.

A convenient valuation
Macy's is clearly sounder than J.C. Penney and Sears, and the company is also outperforming Kohl's and Dillard's by a considerable margin in terms of both sales and profitability, as expressed in its superior gross profit margin and return on equity ratios.

Still, when looking at valuation ratios like P/E and forward P/E, Macy's is only marginally more expensive than its peers.  

Data source: FinViz.

Bottom line
Due to its innovative strategies to adapt to a changing retail industry, Macy's is clearly outperforming the competition in a challenging environment for retailers in general and department stores in particular. But this superior player is only trading at a small valuation premium versus other companies in the industry. In terms of price versus quality, Macy's looks like a convenient purchase for smart shoppers.

You know the retail industry is changing; do you know how to profit?
To learn about two retailers with especially good prospects, take a look at The Motley Fool's special free report: "The Death of Wal-Mart: The Real Cash Kings Changing the Face of Retail." In it, you'll see how these two cash kings are able to consistently outperform and how they're planning to ride the waves of retail's changing tide. You can access it by clicking here.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 13, 2014, at 11:30 AM, TheWiseCurtis wrote:

    Macy is an American come-back story after losing $48B in 2009, and has clearly climbed out of the deep hole. Part of the success is attributable to stupid decisions of Ron Johnson that led to massive shift in market share from Penney to Macy and other retailers.

    Unlike Macy, Penney did not lose any money and was profitable each and every year, even during the deep recession, until Ron Johnson killed the stable profitable businesses.

    Buying into Macy and praying for strong growth as in the last few years has many risks. First off, you are not comparing to low base in 2009 any more. Second, Penney is on track to reclaim their lost customer base, and this will affect Macy's sales growth once Penney is back on its feet.

    It is not easy of course, and there are lots more work for Ullman to do. I stopped by Penney on the weekend and saw brand new theft prevention devices (the little round plastic things), and why would a century old retailer buy new basic theft prevention device. Well, Ron Johnson threw them all away and argued that upscale customers would buy more without the taggy annoying device. He was wrong of course and he made it so easy for customers to walk away with merchandise and not paying for them. It is old staid simple but works. Without them, the lost merchandise would of course show up in reduced gross margin. This is just one example, and there are many more Ullman has to do to bring back margin to historical level.

    I am a stockholder of both Macy and Penney. I of course wish both of them well for the future, but the easy comps will not be available to Macy any more. They have climbed out of the deep hole from the last recession. Penney was NOT in a deep hole during the last recession, but Ron Johnson created a far deeper one for Jenney.

  • Report this Comment On March 20, 2014, at 6:55 PM, TheWiseCurtis wrote:

    I had a typo here also, but this time it was not totally my fault. Macy actually lost $4.8B in 2009, but I saw a S&P combined research report showing Macy's loss at $48B. Other sources I looked at show a loss of $4.8 billion which I believe is the correct number.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2873533, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/27/2014 3:27:51 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement