FDA Concerns Are the Least of These Drugs' Worries

Adverse cognitive effect fears shouldn't derail the new class of cholesterol drugs, but Zetia might.

Mar 17, 2014 at 9:30AM

The race to develop a highly effective cholesterol lowering therapy for patients unable to take statins continues, despite some setbacks. A recent revelation prompted a little panic selling, but a bigger event is looming around the corner. There are much bigger concerns for the new drug class that revolve around an unrelated trial with Merck's (NYSE:MRK) market stage cholesterol therapies. 

Late last week, investors noticed a particularly disturbing piece of news in Sanofi's (NYSE:SNY) annual SEC filing. Sanofi and partner Regeneron (NASDAQ:REGN) "have been advised by the FDA that it has become aware of neurocognitive adverse events in the PCSK9 inhibitor class." The disclosure goes on to state that neurocognitive adverse events have been associated with the use of statins, but Sanofi doesn't know of any associated with its PCSK9 inhibitor, alirocumab. The agency also wants Sanofi and Regeneron to basically look into it, and consider including neurocognitive testing into subsets of patients in existing trials.

Although the statement seemed fairly benign, shares of Regeneron fell nearly 10% almost immediately after the news spread quickly over Twitter. Regeneron regained much of what it lost in the panic, as did competitor in the PCSK9 race Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN). Also investing heavily in PCSK9 therapy is Pfizer (NYSE:PFE), which was relatively unaffected by the news.

REGN Chart

REGN data by YCharts

A fuzzy feeling
As far as adverse events go, the reports of cognitive impairment that the FDA noted in a consumer report updated earlier this year are minor. Other rarely reported statin issues in the agency's update include risk of diabetes and liver injury.

Apparently the regulator has been following rare cases of cognitive impairment that span all statin products for some time now. Patients affected report feeling "fuzzy" or unfocused. Luckily, the feelings are reversible following cessation of treatment.

A more serious concern
While adverse events of any nature should be a cause for concern, the knee-jerk response to such a benign statement illustrates the heavy anxiety surrounding this new drug class. I think the largest risk factor to companies developing PCSK9 therapies is skepticism surrounding the association of lower LDL cholesterol -- the bad kind -- and risk of heart attack or stroke.

At the moment, the FDA is willing to accept reductions in LDL cholesterol as a surrogate endpoint for long-term cardiovascular benefit. This means that companies like Amgen and Sanofi won't be required to monitor patients for years longer than planned.

Unfortunately for the companies, those rules aren't set in stone. If the agency changes its mind, drugmakers will need to pay for lengthy cardiac outcome studies to determine whether or not patients receiving PCSK9 injections actually suffer heart attack or stroke at significantly lower rates.

An important release
Last November, deputy director of the FDA's division of metabolism and endocrinology Eric Colman told Bloomberg that the agency is waiting on results of an extremely long trial, titled Improve-it. The trial, initiated in 2005, is comparing Merck's Vytorin (ezetimibe/simvastatin) to Zetia (ezetimibe). While Zetia is proven to lower LDL cholesterol in patients who can't take statins, its effect on overall risk of cardiac events is still considered unproven.

Since PCSK9 injections are also intended for patients that can't take statins, the results of this trial, expected this September, might be the event of the year. If ezetimibe doesn't significantly lower the risk of cardiac events, the fallout from Sanofi's recent disclosure may pale in comparison.

In 2008, the controversial Enhance study suggested that the combination of simvastatin and ezetimibe did not result in significant differences in thickness of inner-arterial walls compared to simvastatin alone. It's hardly a death-blow for non-statin LDL cholesterol lowering therapies, but it doesn't inspire confidence either. Pfizer has already hedged its bet on its PCSK9 candidate by initiating cardiac outcomes trials. This September Pfizer's competitors may wish they did as well.

Stop worrying about the day to day
As every savvy investor knows, Warren Buffett didn't make billions by betting on half-baked stocks. He isolated his best few ideas, bet big, and rode them to riches, hardly ever selling. You deserve the same. That's why our CEO, legendary investor Tom Gardner, has permitted us to reveal The Motley Fool's 3 Stocks to Own Forever. These picks are free today! Just click here now to uncover the three companies we love. 

Cory Renauer has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information