Why J.C. Penney's Home-Goods Move Is No Game-Changer...Yet!

Now that J.C. Penney announced it would be relaunching its home-goods section, some investors might think the move will greatly improve operations. While this is a possibility, shareholders shouldn't base their investment thesis on the latest development.

Mar 17, 2014 at 2:57PM


Source: Wikimedia Commons

Reuters reported that J.C. Penney (NYSE:JCP) would be relaunching its home goods section. At one time the divisino was a traffic generator for the retailer. But in recent years the business turned away from home goods in favor of higher-priced products. Customers, meanwhile, left for competitors like Kohl's (NYSE:KSS) and Target (NYSE:TGT). Now that J.C. Penney is returning to its roots, does this provide shareholders with the opportunity to buy shares on the cheap?

What the home-goods business means to J.C. Penney
As recently as 2008, J.C. Penney's home-goods division accounted for a whopping 20% of its top line. In a nutshell, the business was comprised of lower-priced products like towels and comforters, many of which were private-brand items. While focusing more on these products may distract from name brands, private labels tend to carry higher margins.

J.C. Penney's move will also allow the business to more effectively attract its previous customer base. After Ron Johnson took over as CEO, he decided to renovate 600 of the company's largest locations, offering store-within-a-store concepts that featured name brands like Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. Since Johnson's ouster and the reinstatement of Mike Ullman as CEO, the idea has evolved to include deals with big players like Walt Disney.

Now, however, with the realization that providing home-goods products will attract more customers, it seems management is working to undo Johnson's legacy. While it is possible that J.C. Penney will be successful in its efforts to attract more customers, it would be foolhardy to think that this alone will turn the company around.

Jcp Home Goods

Source: J.C. Penney

You see, the home-goods division's fall from grace was not the work of Johnson alone. As we can see in the table above, home-goods sales in relation to revenue had been falling for a long time. This means that its problems were likely a sign of something other than Johnson's policies.

Admittedly, the operations do appear to have fallen off a cliff starting in 2011, but Johnson did not assume his role at the company until November of that year. This further highlights the likelihood that the retailer's home-goods section was already at risk when Johnson took over; only he made it worse. 

But can J.C. Penney pull it together in a competitive environment?
While it's nice that J.C. Penney aspires to return to its former glory, the company has a lot of work to do. Over the past five years, J.C. Penney has seen its sales decline a jaw-dropping 32.5% from $17.6 billion to $11.9 billion; challenging industry conditions and customer disenfranchisement from a failed turnaround strategy have greatly impaired the business.

This stands in stark contrast to the results of Kohl's and Target, both companies that have a strong home-goods mix. Over the same time frame, Kohl's has seen its revenue rise 10.5% from $17.2 billion to $19 billion; Target's revenue climbed a slightly more impressive 11% from $65.4 billion to $72.6 billion.

Foolish takeaway
Right now, J.C. Penney's efforts to relaunch its home-goods section looks like a good thing. In the long run, this has the potential to generate additional revenue for the business, but it's important to keep two things in mind.

Firstly, the business was already struggling to keep the section a major part of its operations when Johnson took over. Therefore, it's safe to say that this source of revenue is not easy to maintain, let alone increase. Secondly, when other retailers in the picture like Kohl's and Target are also struggling, the company will likely be hard-pressed to create significant value from its move overnight; the price competition could prove challenging to overcome.

None of this means that the company's decision is a poor one, nor does it mean that it will be impossible to create value in the long run. But it does suggest that investors shouldn't expect shares to skyrocket as a result. Rather, any value created by this move will almost certainly arise over an extended period. The retailer could face a bumpy road during the early phases of implementation.

Is J.C. Penney the king?
Ever since J.C. Penney reported fourth-quarter earnings, shares have been roaring higher. Does this mean that the company has a shot at being the No. 1 stock to own during 2014, or is there something better for the Foolish investor?

There's a huge difference between a good stock and a stock that can make you rich. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it's one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Daniel Jones has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information