Better Buy: GlaxoSmithKline, AbbVie, or Merck?

Shares in GlaxoSmithKline have underperformed the index in recent years. Does this mean the stock is undervalued?

Mar 19, 2014 at 9:30AM

Since the current bull market began in March 2009, shares in GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE:GSK) have underperformed the S&P 500 by a significant amount. While the wider index has posted gains of over 140%, GlaxoSmithKline has managed just over 90%. Could the past underperformance of GlaxoSmithKline now mean that, relative to the market and to its peers, the stock represents good value?

Strong news flow
GlaxoSmithKline's drug pipeline continues to show strength, with the latest piece of news being positive. Its injectable drug, mepolizumab passed its phase 3 trial, with the drug showing statistically significant results for severe eosinophilic asthma. Meanwhile, a second Phase 3 study consisting of an injection of mepolizumab below the skin every four weeks also met its primary endpoint of reducing daily oral corticosteroid use, while maintaining asthma control. In addition, GlaxoSmithKline has also recently received marketing authorization recommendations from the European Medicine Agency's (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) for its chronic obstructive pulmonary disease drugs Anoro and Incruse. 

Dividend comparison
As mentioned, shares in GlaxoSmithKline have underperformed the S&P 500 over the last five years. However, evidence of their potential attraction at current levels can be seen in the dividend yield, which stands at 2.4%. This is significantly higher than that of the S&P 500, which has a yield of 1.9%
GlaxoSmithKline's yield also compares favorably to that of sector peer Merck (NYSE:MRK). It has also underperformed the S&P 500 over the last five years, up 135% versus 154% for the S&P 500. It offers a dividend yield of 2.3%, which is ahead of the S&P 500's yield but behind the 2.4% offered by GlaxoSmithKline. Sector peer AbbVie (NYSE:ABBV), however, has a higher yield of 3.1%.

Merck and AbbVie have both had significant news in the last couple of months. Merck's recent news flow has been upbeat, with the most significant piece being developments regarding its progress on the PD-1 drug, MK-3475. Merck intends to increase its own work on the drug, with the company announcing early stage studies for 20 different PD-L1-positive solid tumor types that have not yet been explored. Merck also announced plans to team-up with three major biopharma companies (Incyte, Pfizer and Amgen) in January, with the group proceeding with efforts to combine MK-3475 with other drugs in clinical trials. The results of the trials (and other developments surrounding MK-3475) could be a major catalyst on the share price.

News flow at AbbVie also has been encouraging, with the company reporting last week that its hepatitis C combination treatment cured almost 100% of patients in a Phase 3 trial. It is one of six late-stage studies that Abbvie conducted as part of an FDA application, with the company set to make the submission by the end of June 2014. The outcome could prove to be a major catalyst for Abbvie's share price because sales projections for the drug were not included in its most recent quarterly update.

Looking ahead
While GlaxoSmithKline has lagged the S&P 500 over the last five years, I like the company for its dividend yield. However, despite being ahead of the yields offered by both the S&P 500 and Merck, it lags that of AbbVie. While all three stocks could have bright futures ahead of them, AbbVie looks to be the most attractive at current price levels based on a considerably higher dividend yield. It could be all set for a great 2014.

1 Must-Buy Stock for 2014
As GlaxoSmithKline shows, there's a huge difference between a good stock and a stock that can make you rich. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it's one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Peter Stephens owns shares of GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information