Why Northrop Grumman Corporation Lobbies Like a Champion

Investors might ignore the lobbying records of their companies, but that's a big mistake.

Mar 19, 2014 at 2:02PM

It's Sunshine Week 2014! For those unfamiliar with the term, Sunshine Week aims to improve the conversation about access to information, encouraging more disclosure from the U.S. government. Money in politics is one of the primary issues, and given that this is a website on investing, our focus this week is on publicly traded companies and the money they spend lobbying Washington. All of the data in this article comes from opensecrets.org and the Senate's Lobbying Disclosure Act database.

Today we are looking at Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC). The defense contractor spent more money lobbying in 2013 than any other publicly traded entity. Of the total $3.21 billion spent on lobbying last year, $20.59 million came from Northrop.

First and foremost, $20.59 million is a huge amount of money to spend winning friends and influencing people, but how does it compare to the company's track record over time? If it's an aberration, maybe we can dismiss the 2013 data as a one-time occurrence.

Noc Lobby Trend

Source: Opensecrets.org.

Northrop actually spent $20.9 million lobbying in 2008, so last year's number certainly isn't an anomaly. In fact, the company's average lobbying spending has trended up for the company over the last decade.

Let's put Northrop's spending in context of the rest of the industry. After all, if Northrop's peers are spending just as much, we can dismiss its behavior as the norm for the entire defense industry. If we were to pool all lobbying dollars for Northrop, Boeing (NYSE:BA), Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT), General Dynamics, and Raytheon, here's how it would look:

Noc V Peers

Source: Opensecrets.org.

Northrop's share of lobbying dollars is clearly much larger than its competitors, but at $15.2 million and $14.4 million, respectively, Boeing and Lockheed Martin are not too far behind. That said, if you factor in market cap, implying larger companies will spend more on a nominal basis than smaller peers, Northrop is punching way above its weight class here.

Now let's look at exactly what Northrop is focused on in Washington. Here's a look at the company's efforts broken out by the number of lobbying reports addressing specific issue codes:

Noc By Issue

Source: Opensecrets.org.

By and large, all of these categories make sense based on Northrop's business. "Medicare & Medicaid" and "Health Issues" stand out as different, but the company was lobbying on those issues from an information technology angle, specifically on "Health Information Technology Adoption" and "Health IT Fraud Prevention." A seasoned Northrop investor might not bat an eye at this data, but if you are new to this company, you can use it to quickly discover what issues really matter to the health of the business.

Why all of this matters
Now that we've flushed out Northrop Grumman's lobbying profile, it's fair to ask what it all means. Does lobbying really matter to investors?

Surprisingly, yes.

There is a growing body of work that illustrates that publicly traded companies that spend money lobbying post better market returns than companies that do not. A 2013 academic paper from the University of Mississippi concluded that there is a direct link between lobbying activity and shareholder wealth: "Our results suggest that stocks of lobbying firms significantly outperform non-lobbying firms."

An investment research firm called Strategas has taken it one step further, creating an index that tracks the 50 companies that spend the most money on lobbying every year. The firm claims its index has beaten the S&P 500 for the last 15 straight years, implying the market is not properly valuing lobbying expenditures.

Lobbying is not necessarily an opportunity in the minds of most investors. In the spirit of Sunshine Week, it's time to celebrate disclosure and shine a little light on the lobbying activities of your stock holdings. 

3 stocks for your retirement
It's no secret that investors tend to be impatient with the market, but the best investment strategy is to buy shares in solid businesses and keep them for the long term. In the special free report "3 Stocks That Will Help You Retire Rich," The Motley Fool shares investment ideas and strategies that could help you build wealth for years to come. Click here to grab your free copy today.

Aimee Duffy has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon Company. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information