Rooney Mara’s Casting as Tiger Lily in ‘Pan’ Re-Opens Debate Over Race in Hollywood Casting

Rooney Mara was just cast as Tiger Lily in Warner Bros.’ upcoming film "Pan," but thousands have signed an online petition protesting the casting of a white actress as a Native American.

Mar 21, 2014 at 8:20AM

Time Warner (NYSE:TWX)/Warner Bros.' upcoming film Pan was recently criticized in an online petition attracting nearly 6,000 signatures, after the studio cast white actress Rooney Mara as Native American princess Tiger Lily.

The casting choice was criticized as a big step backwards for Hollywood films, which had made admirable progress over the past several decades in casting actors and actresses of color in appropriate roles.

Image

Tiger Lily and Rooney Mara. (Source: Wikipedia, author's edits)

Pan is director Joe Wright's darker take on Peter Pan's origin, which transports a World War II orphan to Neverland to protect an island's natives against villainous pirates such as Blackbeard and Captain Hook. Hugh Jackman and Garrett Hedlund will play Blackbeard and Captain Hook respectively, while newcomer Levi Miller has been cast in the title role.

Hollywood's history of casting the wrong race for the role
Back in Hollywood's early days, it was deemed acceptable to cast white actors as other races. Legends such as Fred Astaire and Judy Garland appeared in blackface, Mickey Rooney infamously portrayed a Japanese caricature in Breakfast at Tiffany's, and John Wayne even played Genghis Khan in The Conqueror.

Awful Movies

"I fight! I love! I conquer like a barbarian!" (John Wayne as Genghis Khan in The Conqueror, 1956)

Over the years, those lines became less clearly defined. Although it was no longer acceptable for white actors to be cast in black roles, it was still common for Latin actors to be cast as Arabs, Asian actors to be broadly cast as any kind of Asian, and white actors assuming the role of any type of European. And of course, English was spoken in all countries across all historical periods.

Despite that mixed progress, several recent films have reverted to casting white men and women in roles clearly written for actors of color. 21, Cloud Atlas, Avatar: The Last Airbender, and Edge of Tomorrow all cast white actors in roles intended for Asian characters. Meanwhile, Disney's (NYSE:DIS) Prince of Persia: Sands of Time cast Jake Gyllenhaal as the Persian prince, while The Lone Ranger featured Johnny Depp (who claims to have Cherokee roots) as the Native American hero Tonto.

Racist casting or color-blind casting?
It's easy to criticize these casting choices as racist and inappropriate, but we should also remember that studios have also cast actors of color in roles originally intended for white actors.

In Man of Steel, Lois Lane's boss Perry White was played by Laurence Fishburne. Will Smith played Jim West in Wild Wild West, a role previously played by white actor Robert Conrad. Lana Lang, who was a redhead Caucasian in the comics, was portrayed by Dutch-Chinese actress Kristin Kreuk in Smallville.

Studios refer to this kind of casting as color-blind or integrated casting. While this practice is widely accepted in roles based on contemporary fiction, problems can arise when well-known franchises or historical stories are recast with actors of other races.

For example, BBC One's Merlin featured a black actress, Angel Coulby, as Lady Guinevere, while the Royal Shakespeare Company cast British Nigerian actor David Oyelowo as King Henry VI -- both controversial choices that sparked fierce debates as to whether TV shows or films should sacrifice historical accuracy for casting equality.

Angel

Angel Coulby played Guinevere in BBC's Merlin. (Source: Wikipedia)

Of course, it can also be argued that the Arthurian legends were never factual to begin with, and that William Shakespeare himself cast men as women in his original performances, so this contemporary debate could really be much ado about nothing.

Are people overreacting to Rooney Mara as Tiger Lily?
Returning to Pan, the casting of Rooney Mara as Tiger Lily can be interpreted in two ways.

Critics will point out Hollywood's long history of derogatory, stereotypical portrayals of Native Americans, which has lasted from the Silent Film era into the modern one. However, Rooney Mara's fans can easily point out that Neverland is not America, so the interpretation of a "native princess" is open to interpretation.

In fact, Tiger Lilly has been portrayed by a Chinese American actress (Anna May Wong), a Japanese actress (Maria Kawamura), an African American actress (Paula Kelly), a Filipino actress (Rhoda Montemayor), and a white actress (Sondra Lee) over the past 90 years. Tiger Lily has actually only been portrayed once in film by a Native American actress -- Q'orianka Kilcher in Comcast (NASDAQ:CMCSA)/Syfy's miniseries Neverland.

Aaya

Q'orianka Kilcher as Tiger Lily/Aaya in Neverland. (Source: Syfy)

Could Pan be a potential blockbuster?
Despite the recent casting controversy, Pan could still be a major box office hit. Peter Pan reboots and retellings have generally fared well critically and commercially.

Film

Studio

Production budget

Global box office

Rotten Tomatoes (critics/audience)

Hook (1991)

TriStar

$77 million

$301 million

31%/76%

Peter Pan (2003)

Universal/ Columbia

$100 million

$122 million

77%/74%

Finding Neverland (2004)

Miramax

$25 million

$117 million

83%/87%

Source: Box Office Mojo, Rotten Tomatoes.

Hook, starring Robin Williams, Julia Roberts, and Dustin Hoffman, remains the most divisive title among critics and audiences, despite being the highest-grossing live-action Peter Pan film ever. Pan could replicate Hook's success, since it also features a high-profile cast of A-list stars and adds a similarly modern twist to the classic tale by warping Peter out of a World War II environment into Neverland.

Warner Bros. apparently has a lot of confidence in Pan's success, since it is pitting it head-to-head against Comcast/Universal's Ted 2 on June 26, 2015. That's a daring bet, since the first Ted film grossed a whopping $549 million at the box office on a budget of $50 million.

My final take
What do you think, dear readers? Did Warner Bros. cross the line by casting Rooney Mara as Tiger Lily, or was this simply an example of color-blind casting?

Despite this recent controversy, upcoming blockbusters like Pan can benefit shrewd investors who know the right media companies to follow. Find out how to profit from the growth of these franchises in a comprehensive free report from The Motley Fool. Please make sure to share your thoughts on Pan in the comments section below!

Leo Sun owns shares of Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

1 Key Step to Get Rich

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better. Whether that’s helping people overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we can help.

Feb 1, 2016 at 4:54PM

To be perfectly clear, this is not a get-rich action that my Foolish colleagues and I came up with. But we wouldn't argue with the approach.

A 2015 Business Insider article titled, "11 websites to bookmark if you want to get rich" rated The Motley Fool as the #1 place online to get smarter about investing.

"The Motley Fool aims to build a strong investment community, which it does by providing a variety of resources: the website, books, a newspaper column, a radio [show], and [newsletters]," wrote (the clearly insightful and talented) money reporter Kathleen Elkins. "This site has something for every type of investor, from basic lessons for beginners to investing commentary on mutual funds, stock sectors, and value for the more advanced."

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better, so it's nice to receive that kind of recognition. It lets us know we're doing our job.

Whether that's helping the entirely uninitiated overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we want to provide our readers with a boost to the next step on their journey to financial independence.

Articles and beyond

As Business Insider wrote, there are a number of resources available from the Fool for investors of all levels and styles.

In addition to the dozens of free articles we publish every day on our website, I want to highlight two must-see spots in your tour of fool.com.

For the beginning investor

Investing can seem like a Big Deal to those who have yet to buy their first stock. Many investment professionals try to infuse the conversation with jargon in order to deter individual investors from tackling it on their own (and to justify their often sky-high fees).

But the individual investor can beat the market. The real secret to investing is that it doesn't take tons of money, endless hours, or super-secret formulas that only experts possess.

That's why we created a best-selling guide that walks investors-to-be through everything they need to know to get started. And because we're so dedicated to our mission, we've made that available for free.

If you're just starting out (or want to help out someone who is), go to www.fool.com/beginners, drop in your email address, and you'll be able to instantly access the quick-read guide ... for free.

For the listener

Whether it's on the stationary exercise bike or during my daily commute, I spend a lot of time going nowhere. But I've found a way to make that time benefit me.

The Motley Fool offers five podcasts that I refer to as "binge-worthy financial information."

Motley Fool Money features a team of our analysts discussing the week's top business and investing stories, interviews, and an inside look at the stocks on our radar. It's also featured on several dozen radio stations across the country.

The hosts of Motley Fool Answers challenge the conventional wisdom on life's biggest financial issues to reveal what you really need to know to make smart money moves.

David Gardner, co-founder of The Motley Fool, is among the most respected and trusted sources on investing. And he's the host of Rule Breaker Investing, in which he shares his insights into today's most innovative and disruptive companies ... and how to profit from them.

Market Foolery is our daily look at stocks in the news, as well as the top business and investing stories.

And Industry Focus offers a deeper dive into a specific industry and the stories making headlines. Healthcare, technology, energy, consumer goods, and other industries take turns in the spotlight.

They're all informative, entertaining, and eminently listenable ... and I don't say that simply because the hosts all sit within a Nerf-gun shot of my desk. Rule Breaker Investing and Answers contain timeless advice, so you might want to go back to the beginning with those. The other three take their cues from the market, so you'll want to listen to the most recent first. All are available at www.fool.com/podcasts.

But wait, there's more

The book and the podcasts – both free ... both awesome – also come with an ongoing benefit. If you download the book, or if you enter your email address in the magical box at the podcasts page, you'll get ongoing market coverage sent straight to your inbox.

Investor Insights is valuable and enjoyable coverage of everything from macroeconomic events to investing strategies to our analyst's travels around the world to find the next big thing. Also free.

Get the book. Listen to a podcast. Sign up for Investor Insights. I'm not saying that any of those things will make you rich ... but Business Insider seems to think so.


Compare Brokers