Accountants Severely Undervalue These Brands

Americans love their favorite brands. That mystical, intangible allure of Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO  ) , Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX  ) coffee,that first sip of Pepsi (NYSE: PEP  ) , and Altria Group's (NYSE: MO  ) Marlboro cigarettes keeps customers reaching for the same brand time and again.

Although difficult to fathom, some brands add significant value to the products with which they are associated. All of the trucks, bottlers, and cans in Coca-Cola's system would be worth far less if the Coca-Cola brand were not attached to the business. Yet it's hard to say exactly how much the brand is worth.

Accountants don't give brands the light of day
Companies often carry a (usually arbitrary) brand value on the books. For instance, Coca-Cola carries its trademarks at $6.7 billion and all of its intangible assets at $27.6 billion, or 31% of total assets. Starbucks' intangible assets account for just 10% of its total assets. Altria's intangibles account for almost 50%. Finally, PepsiCo's bean counters say 42% of its total assets consist of intangible assets.

If these numbers captured the full value of the brands, then each of these companies would be worth book value -- their accounting net worth. However, most investors are willing to pay much more than book value; the earnings generated by assets not on the balance sheet (i.e., the full value of their brands) makes these companies worth a lot more than any accountant gives them credit.

Company

Current Price-to-Book

Book Value / 2013 Earnings

Coca-Cola

5.1

3.9

PepsiCo

5.1

3.6

Starbucks

11.5

1.6 

Altria Group

17.6

0.9

Source: Morningstar. The far right column shows the P/E ratio if the stock traded at 1 times book.

What's in a brand
Part of the reason accountants are so hopeless in their quest to quantify brand value is that it's hard to put a value on an intangible asset. Brands give meaning beyond the basic utility of a product.

For instance, Coke may have been an important part of a Baby Boomer's childhood; drinking Coke makes them feel young, but drinking a Pepsi or RC Cola does not carry the same nostalgia. Likewise, customers who value the quality of their coffee may be more likely to go to Starbucks, even though McDonald's (NYSE: MCD  ) sources similar coffee beans. The Starbucks brand shouts "quality!" while McDonald's screams "value!"

There are countless other reasons customers choose Pepsi over Coke (or vice versa), Starbucks over McDonald's, and Marlboro over Camel. Although it is important to understand why these brands are popular, it is even more important to understand the value these brands deliver for shareholders.

Instead of focusing on a dollar figure, it is easier to quantify a brand in terms of what it does for the business. Marlboro enables Altria Group to raise prices and generate additional revenue even as volume shrinks. A large swath of the smoking population reaches for a Marlboro every time they smoke without regard to price. Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Starbucks share that quality -- pricing power -- to various extents as well.

Pricing power is perhaps the most valuable asset a business can ever attain. As my colleague Andres Cardenal points out, pricing power is Warren Buffett's favorite business quality. A business that can consistently raise prices -- no matter what the economic environment -- is going to generate a lot of shareholder value.

If you look at return on equity, companies with pricing power are generating enormous profits. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo generate a high-20s percentage return on equity, Starbucks' return on equity is in the low 20s, and Altria Group's is in the low-30s. Imagine you had the choice of either investing in the stock market, or starting a business that gives you a 25% annual return on the capital you invest. You would choose the 25% return on investment every time -- and so would the potential competitors of these companies.

However, strong brands offer these companies protection from competition. Dr Pepper Snapple Co (NYSE: DPS  ) cannot hope to introduce a brand that can knock Coke off the top spot. Heck, not even Pepsi has a chance of doing that. Coke drinkers keep reaching for Coke -- no other cola can give them what a Coke gives them. As a result, Coca-Cola's high return on equity is protected from competition.

Bottom line
What's the difference between a Coke and an RC Cola? Starbucks and your local coffee shop? Marlboro and any other cigarette? It's the brand, and the brand makes all the difference.

Brands are incredibly valuable, but nobody can say exactly how valuable. Even though it cannot be quantified, investment analysis of companies with strong brands should center on the brand's staying power. After all, it's the brands that generate outsized profits.

Brands to own forever
As every savvy investor knows, Warren Buffett didn't make billions by betting on half-baked stocks. He isolated his best few ideas, bet big, and rode them to riches, hardly ever selling. You deserve the same. That's why our CEO, legendary investor Tom Gardner, has permitted us to reveal The Motley Fool's 3 Stocks to Own Forever. These picks are free today! Just click here now to uncover the three companies we love. 


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 23, 2014, at 6:41 AM, ryanchandler25 wrote:

    Accountants do not value brands or any other asset for that matter.

  • Report this Comment On March 23, 2014, at 7:43 AM, twcooper wrote:

    @ryanchandler25

    True. It is more correct to say "accounting methods cause these brands to be held on the books at significantly less than fair value."

  • Report this Comment On March 23, 2014, at 7:01 PM, dschauber2000 wrote:

    And, if I understand correctly, internally-developed intangible assets don't show up on the balance sheet at all, only those that were picked up through acquisitions. This rule was put in place to keep companies from slapping any old arbitrary value on their internally-developed assets.

    This only goes to reinforce your point that a balance sheet doesn't necessarily tell the whole story.

    Thanks for this informative article.

    Dave

  • Report this Comment On May 29, 2014, at 1:42 PM, LaureyWilliams wrote:

    I wonder how my accountant would react to this article. I know that he really likes most of these brands, so I don't think he would try to undervalue them. I'll have to ask him and get his opinion. www.mansellassociates.com.au

  • Report this Comment On July 28, 2014, at 4:41 PM, jessievera wrote:

    I would love to discuss this article in one of my business accounting classes that I took in college. I found it interesting that accounts are undervaluing these brands. I never would of thought that to be the case. I am interested to find out and ask some of the accountants I know and see what their thoughts on this brand are.

    Jessie | http://www.marybethcpa.com/services

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2879768, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/26/2014 1:58:53 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you

Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Advertisement