Could ExxonMobil Stop Russia in Its Tracks?

Russia's government and its giant state controlled oil company Rosneft are depending on ExxonMobil's technological expertise to benefit the country's offshore oil and gas production. Could Putin's antics set that aid aside?

Mar 22, 2014 at 12:00PM

As Russian forces have moved to cement the apparent will of Crimean voters, in the process taking over Ukraine's naval headquarters on the peninsula, two key questions have bobbed to the fore: 1) Will Vladimir Putin and his minions extend their sweep farther? 2) Could ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) become a forceful weapon for the U.S. in dealing with Russia's expansionary appetite?

A semi-submersible rig working under a contract with ExxonMobil.

The response to the first query is simply a matter of opinion, although most of those opining on the telly or in print these days clearly believe that Crimea is simply the first step for an ambitious Russian regime. The second question is somewhat more vexing. As you know, about two years ago Exxon and Russia's state-controlled oil behemoth Rosneft signed a series of joint venture agreements with each another. A loggerheads status between their respective countries clearly wouldn't benefit either company.

One-way technology sharing
The agreements were billed as an opportunity "to share technology and expertise." In reality, however, it's noteworthy that those two elements are flowing almost exclusively from Exxon to Rosneft. The latter company's contribution consists largely of potentially massive amounts of oil and gas in as-yet unexplored territories. For instance, Exxon obtained an opportunity to pony up with Rosneft in exploring the Kara Sea of the Russian Arctic, along with portions of the Black Sea.

Conversely, Rosneft gained interests in 20 blocks owned by ExxonMobil in the Gulf of Mexico, along with an equal stake in a Permian Basin project. It also became a partner of Exxon in Alberta's Cardium Shale formation. In 2013 the two companies returned to the bargaining table, from whence Rosneft emerged with an interest in Alaska's Point Thomson natural-gas field. For its part, ExxonMobil also got entry into shale basins in Western Siberia.

Are tighter sanctions likely?
But what if a scenario emerges wherein, with Crimea under its control, Russia moves to occupy another of its neighbors -- the Baltic nation of Estonia gained some mention at midweek -- and NATO's members tighten the meager sanctions they're already imposing against the Russian bear? Obviously a number of Western companies would be affected. Chevron (NYSE:CVX), for instance, is a major investor in the Caspian Pipeline Consortium and a significant supplier of lubricants additives in Russia.

And Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) provides products and services to the country's oil and gas companies. Beyond that, it operates a research and development facility in Russia.

But ExxonMobil would obviously be affected the most. But its CEO Rex Tillerson recently noted, "There has been no impact on any of our plans or activities at this point, nor would I expect there to be any, barring governments taking steps that are beyond our control."

Tillerson's assessment is accurate to a point, or at least as it relates to Russia. In actuality, however, his company heads a consortium whose objective is the exploration of Ukraine's portion of the Black Sea. Plans for that group, which had included Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE:RDS-B) -- until the company bowed out in January -- have been put on hold. Exxon already has a massive gas find to its credit in the Black Sea's Romanian portion.

Severely wounding Russia's economy
Russia's ambitious energy program (easily the most important sector of its economy) would clearly be affected more severely by stronger sanctions than would any of the Western companies. The country is woefully inadequate in its mastery of energy operations and technological sophistication. It almost certainly would be unable to proceed on its own.

Among the indicators of its laggard status was a late 2012 accident during which a Russian rig, the Kolskoye, was being inappropriately towed from Sakhalin Island through a winter storm. When its water discharge systems were overcome, the unit sank in the icy waters of the Sea of Okhotsk, costing dozens of lives. As The New York Times said at the time, "Though the Russian rig ... was not drilling when it sank, the accident was a setback for Russia's ambitions to expand offshore drilling to replace declining output on land, and maintain oil exports that are vital to the country's economy."

The Foolish takeaway
Whether or not there's a possibility of sanctions prohibiting Western oil companies -- especially ExxonMobil -- from participation in Russian joint ventures clearly will depend on Putin's determination to expand his trek across Eastern Europe. It's virtually certain, however, that such an edict would wound the country's vital oil and gas program severely.

The current contretemps with Russia could make lots of oil and gas companies even more compelling than they were previously. One such oil-field services company stands out in particular. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report reveals the company we're calling OPEC's Worst Nightmare. Just click HERE to uncover the name of this industry-leading stock... and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable LANDSLIDE of profits!

David Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Chevron. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information