In Retail, You Lose Even When You Win!

Guess? reported strong results for the fourth quarter of its 2014 fiscal year. Despite this performance, shares fell on a terrible outlook for the company. Is now a good time to consider buying in, or should investors consider American Eagle Outfitters or Aeropostale instead?

Mar 22, 2014 at 10:00AM


Source: Wikimedia Commons

On March 19, Guess? (NYSE:GES) reported fiscal fourth-quarter earnings. Despite seeing stronger-than-anticipated quarterly performance, a dour forecast by the company's management caused shares to plunge 5% at the open of trading on the following day. Given the strong performance the company enjoyed, combined with the significant discount its shares are now trading for, is now an attractive time to buy? Should the Foolish investor instead steer clear of the business?

Guess? smashed forecasts!
For the quarter, Guess? reported revenue of $768.4 million. Although this represents a 6% decline compared to the $815.1 million the retailer reported in the year-ago quarter, it's 1% higher than the $758.5 million forecast by analysts. In its release, management attributed the decline to falling sales across the board.

In its North American segment, for instance, Guess? saw its revenue fall 6%. This was due, in large part, to a 4.4% drop in comparable-store sales. But it was also chalked up to the company closing 3.5% of its stores compared to the number it operated a year earlier. The business' European segment also saw substantial declines, while its Asia segment ticked down a little more than 1%.

Although a small portion of overall revenue, Guess'? North American wholesale segment was the most adversely affected on a percentage basis. During the quarter, the company saw sales fall nearly 20% from $50.9 million to $40.8 million.

  Estimate Actual Last Year Surprise
Revenue $758.5m $768.4m $815.1m +1.3%
EPS $0.78 $0.82 $0.85 +5.1%

Source: Guess?

In terms of profits, Guess? saw mediocre performance for the quarter but did better than analysts expected. Earnings per share came in at $0.82. This represents a 5% gain compared to analysts' estimates but fell shy of the $0.85 the company reported in the year-ago quarter. This drop, when placed next to last year's results, was mainly due to the company's revenue decline; it  was partially offset by fewer shares outstanding and lower selling, general, and administrative expenses and income taxes as a percentage of sales.

Even though these results weren't bad on a stand-alone basis, investors are uncertain about the company. This is because of where management believes performance is headed in the near future. As opposed to the revenue of $2.6 billion forecast by analysts for the 2015 fiscal year, management believes its top line will come in between $2.53 billion and $2.58 billion; earnings per share will be between $1.40 and $1.60, significantly lower than the expected $2.


Source: Wikimedia Commons

Guess? isn't alone in its plight
Guess? isn't the only retailer to take some blows lately. In its most recent quarter, Aeropostale (NYSE:ARO) saw its numbers come in far worse than anticipated, pushing shares down 20% after the news became public. For the quarter, the company reported $670 million in revenue. This was 16% lower than the $797.7 million the retailer reported in the year-ago quarter and fell below the $685 million analysts anticipated.

In terms of profits, Aeropostale did even worse. For the quarter, the company experienced a loss per share of -$0.90. This was significantly worse than forecast and lower than the -$0.01 loss analysts hoped to see. In addition to being negatively affected by a drop in sales, the company cited rising costs as a contributor to its woes.

Whereas the cost of goods sold was 80.2% of the company's expenses (as a percent of sales) last year, it accounted for 87% in 2013. Similarly, Aeropostale's selling, general, and administrative expenses rose from 19.9% of sales to 24.9%. These soaring costs were, in part, attributed to impairment charges and litigation expenses, respectively.


Source: Wikimedia Commons

Another poor performer was American Eagle Outfitters (NYSE:AEO). After the retailer on March 11 reported that its revenue declined 7% from $1.1 billion to $1.04 billion, shares fell 8%. Admittedly, this drop in its top line still allowed the business to beat revenue forecasts of $1.03 billion, but its lackluster earnings left investors worried.

Looking at profits, American Eagle's results were poor but not as poor as Aeropostale's. American Eagle saw its earnings per share come in at $0.05. This was a whopping 89% lower than the $0.47 analysts hoped to see and was, like Aeropostale, due to lower revenue and higher costs. Chief among these was the business' cost of goods sold, which soared from 58.8% of sales to 70.6%.

Foolish takeaway
There's no hiding that Guess'? forecast is, to some extent, foreboding. However, investors can take comfort in the idea that the business' performance over its most recent quarter was superior to both Aeropostale and American Eagle.

Moving forward, this does not mean that Guess? or any of its peers are attractive investments. But it does suggest that Guess? may have a better position than its rivals. Should the retail market turn around, this could present the Foolish investor with a nice opportunity. But it's important to keep in mind the risks associated with the industry.

The Motley Fool's Best of the Best
There's a huge difference between a good stock and a stock that can make you rich. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it's one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Daniel Jones has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Guess?. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

A Financial Plan on an Index Card

Keeping it simple.

Aug 7, 2015 at 11:26AM

Two years ago, University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack wrote his entire financial plan on an index card.

It blew up. People loved the idea. Financial advice is often intentionally complicated. Obscurity lets advisors charge higher fees. But the most important parts are painfully simple. Here's how Pollack put it:

The card came out of chat I had regarding what I view as the financial industry's basic dilemma: The best investment advice fits on an index card. A commenter asked for the actual index card. Although I was originally speaking in metaphor, I grabbed a pen and one of my daughter's note cards, scribbled this out in maybe three minutes, snapped a picture with my iPhone, and the rest was history.

More advisors and investors caught onto the idea and started writing their own financial plans on a single index card.

I love the exercise, because it makes you think about what's important and forces you to be succinct.

So, here's my index-card financial plan:


Everything else is details. 

Something big just happened

I don't know about you, but I always pay attention when one of the best growth investors in the world gives me a stock tip. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner (whose growth-stock newsletter was rated #1 in the world by The Wall Street Journal)* and his brother, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner, just revealed two brand new stock recommendations moments ago. Together, they've tripled the stock market's return over 12+ years. And while timing isn't everything, the history of Tom and David's stock picks shows that it pays to get in early on their ideas.

Click here to be among the first people to hear about David and Tom's newest stock recommendations.

*"Look Who's on Top Now" appeared in The Wall Street Journal which references Hulbert's rankings of the best performing stock picking newsletters over a 5-year period from 2008-2013.

Compare Brokers