One Stock That Finally Grew Up

Photo: JDR

It was almost like finding $20 in a pair of old jeans.

I recently stumbled on an old find -- Universal Insurance Holdings (NYSE: UVE  ) . We reunited after I first found it in 2010. Back then, Universal Insurance Holdings was a rare breed. It wrote homeowners policies in Florida. And it had a shareholder base that was content to make it a proxy for hurricane predictions.

Every fall, it seemed, Universal Insurance Holdings would trend up as the prospect for a costly hurricane trended down. Those who had the guts would hold it through a full year, collecting a dividend yield which regularly ventured into double digits.

But what made it truly unique was its love for risk. Universal Insurance Holdings had one of the most questionable investment portfolios in the insurance industry. Whereas its peers would have invested primarily in high-grade debt and a small stock portfolio, Universal Insurance Holdings had a preference for precious metals.

In 2009, a full 20% of its investments were in metals-related equities. Sinking a fifth of the portfolio in one industry is bad enough. Sinking it in one of the most volatile industries in all of finance is just downright stupid -- something a doomsday prepper would do. 

An irrationality discount
I quickly balked from an investment in Universal Insurance Holdings after discovering its investment portfolio. If gold or silver plunged at the same time a hurricane struck Florida, Universal Insurance Holdings would invariably take a dive.

But like many stories, this one has a happy ending. Universal Insurance Holdings has grown up. It hired Deutsche Bank to manage its investment portfolio. The 2014 annual report states:

"Working with the investment advisor, we transitioned the composition of our portfolio to a more traditional insurance company investment portfolio."

Cash now makes up about 25% of its investments. Debt securities made up about 61%. The scars of the old investment portfolio are still visible on its income statements, however. Millions of dollars of realized losses appear in their respective 2011, 2012, and 2013 columns.

Meanwhile, Universal Insurance Holdings has also sized up its reinsurance. The 2014 annual report reveals reinsurance that limits Universal's exposure to $27.5 million of the first, second, and third wind event in Florida. For reference, the loss limit is about one-tenth of Universal's premium revenue.

Universal Insurance Holdings has evolved and prospered, escaping what would have been catastrophic losses from several sizable hurricanes had they happened in the summers of 2010 through 2013. Luckily, they didn't.

Since 2010, Universal Insurance Holdings has more than tripled. Shares traded from a low of $4 in 2010 to nearly $15 in 2014.

Looking back
I missed out on a big winner. But what is most important here is the lesson learned -- some companies can change. Often, change happens for the better.

Betting on change, however, comes often with undue and uncertain risks (in this case, what the price of gold or silver would be, and when the next big hurricane would strike Florida). While it's easy to look back and imagine all the money that could be made on the little insurer of Florida, it requires some perspective.

Looking backward, it's easy to make the right call. But finance is a game of looking forward. Those who first looked at it in 2010 saw an insurance company with an insane investment policy. Those who first crack its annual reports in 2014 see a completely rational insurer making money hand over fist. The difference of opinion is split only by time.

9 rock-solid dividend stocks you can buy today
One of the dirty secrets that few finance professionals will openly admit is the fact that dividend stocks as a group handily outperform their non-dividend paying brethren. The reasons for this are too numerous to list here, but you can rest assured that it's true. However, knowing this is only half the battle. The other half is identifying which dividend stocks in particular are the best. With this in mind, our top analysts put together a free list of nine high-yielding stocks that should be in every income investor's portfolio. To learn the identity of these stocks instantly and for free, all you have to do is click here now.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (12)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 25, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Stocklovr wrote:

    While I agree that putting 20% of company investments is dangerous... should you really base your decision to buy or sell on this information?

    In retrospect, it wasn't the best company investment policy/decision... in retrospect, but investments in the market can change in a heartbeat. By they time you read about it in their 10-K or 10-Q, they might have sold out of everything and put the money elsewhere.

    I looked at it as a "speculative" investment because the company is small and because of where they insure. The company is profitable and has paid a nice dividend for years.

    Count me as one who bought in the $4 range and am quite happy with the investment. I bought it as a small spec for income and future growth and that's better than gambling on the next biotech with no earnings and a mere hope that they create a blockbuster drug.

    I don't like investing that much in commodities in the first place but I don't think that should be a primary reason to run from the stock. I've never considered it that risky, especially when my largest loss ever was a "blue chip" called Bank of America.

  • Report this Comment On March 25, 2014, at 1:42 PM, TMFValueMagnet wrote:

    Stocklovr, when it comes to insurance, there's really only two things I care about:

    1) Is the company underwriting profitably, or at least more profitably than its peers?

    2) Is the insurance portfolio reasonably invested?

    Universal Insurance Holdings largely met the first criteria. P&C insurance in Florida is pretty risky, after all, with or without reinsurance. But good years would pay for the bad.

    The investment portfolio is what really turned me off. Precious metals are historically finicky. The mining industry as a whole tends to be a remarkably horrible investment over time.

    Miners generate substantially zero free cash flow, and merely grow their holdings of (very) volatile in-the-ground stores of metals as earnings are plowed back into the company.

    An insurance company's book value is your money. If you're not comfortable with how an insurance company invests, I see no reason to own that company in your portfolio.

  • Report this Comment On March 26, 2014, at 12:41 PM, griderX wrote:

    Jordan you nailed it spot on!

    Their investment portfolio of precious metals securities gave me the jitters as well.

    New managemnet seems very shareholder friendly, they hired DB to manage their cash, buy back shares...reduced sharecount by about 13%, expand insurable geography (new markets and products). I think the future is quite bright for UVE, given that they have been keeping their loss ratio below 50% for the last 4 quarters.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2887909, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/26/2014 8:05:12 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement