The Real Problem of Facebook Inc's WhatsApp Acquisition

Facebook  (NASDAQ: FB  )  has been pretty successful in acquiring growing social platforms and integrating them into its own vast network. The company's eye-popping acquisition of WhatsApp for a whopping $19 billion portrays Mark Zuckerberg's intentions of gobbling up rising competitors to protect his own castle.

While WhatsApp is growing at a rapid-fire rate and has amassed a user-base of more than 450 million users, the real problem with the acquisition is not entirely the high price tag, but the business model of WhatsApp. 

Expensive deal
Facebook's decision to pay such a large amount can be mostly justified as a defensive stance so that one of its bigger rivals were not able get their hands on WhatsApp. It has been reported that Google  (NASDAQ: GOOGL  )  had been interested in WhatsApp earlier, but couldn't cut a deal to acquire it. The revenue of WhatsApp in 2013 was reportedly under $20 million, so it's pretty easy to figure out why Google didn't want to pay an insanely high price.

WhatsApp has been growing rapidly with 70% of its monthly user base using the service every day. The cross mobile communication platform earned a high price tag, because Mark Zuckerberg believes that he and his firm will be able to generate revenue to justify the price tag of $42 per user. In addition, Facebook will be issuing substantial amounts of stock to WhatsApp, which will dilute existing shareholders, and WhatsApp's stockholders will end up owning 8% of Facebook after the deal closes. 

WhatsApp will remain an independent entity, just like Instagram, which Facebook bought for $1 billion. Instagram's user base surged past 180 million, and Instagram is an ad-supported model. In fact, recently, Instagram signed a big deal with Omnicom for a reported $100 million, which will help expedite Instagram's revenue generation capabilities. 

Business model of WhatsApp
But unlike Instagram, WhatsApp's business model doesn't include ads. In fact, WhatsApp has been against ads ever since its inception. Instead, it offers its users one year of free service, and from the second year on, users pay a small fee of $0.99 annually. This is a much different playbook from Facebook, and substantially diminishes the revenue growth prospects of WhatsApp. 

In 2013, Facebook's revenue per user, or ARPU, grew 28% to $6.81 and WhatsApp's revenue generation capabilities are likely to fall short to that number. And this lack of advertising revenue from WhatsApp will make it very difficult for Facebook to recoup its sizable investment of $19 billion. However, things might change, as WhatsApp has a large base of international users. It also stated, after the deal announcement, that it would start voice calls on its messaging service in mid-2014.

Minimal pricing power
WhatsApp does operate in an intense competitive environment as it competes against numerous similar mobile messaging apps like Snapchat, Blackberry's BBM, Apple's FaceTime, Microsoft's Skype, and most notably Viber.  Viber was recently bought by Rakuten at a valuation of $3 per user for its 300 million users. Chinese e-commerce firm, Alibaba made a $215 million investment in mobile messaging service, Tango, which has 200 million registered users. 

Amid so many mobile messaging services, many of whom are cross-platform, WhatsApp might not be able to get enough paying customers into its fold, which makes it's rather difficult to justify such a large price-tag. So Facebook will have to introduce ads to WhatsApp to make the acquisition accretive to its earnings.

The takeaway
WhatsApp's broad overseas exposure will help Facebook enter newer markets and is a great addition to Facebook's portfolio of social assets. But it's tough to justify the large purchase price as it will be hard for WhatsApp to add to Facebooks bottom line. And rising competition; from the likes of Skype, BBM, Viber, Snapchat, and others, will make it very difficult for WhatsApp to generate substantial amounts of revenue.  

Why I’m investing $117,238 in this one stock
Opportunities to get wealthy from a single investment don't come around often, but they do exist, and our chief technology officer believes he's found one. In this free report, Jeremy Phillips shares the single company that he believes could transform not only your portfolio, but your entire life. To learn the identity of this stock for free and see why Jeremy is putting more than $100,000 of his own money into it, all you have to do is click here now.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (10)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 24, 2014, at 1:47 PM, sidorg222 wrote:

    Wasn't this the same thing that was said about Facebook? The big question was, how will FB every monetize the 1.2 billion users it has? Hasn't that question been answered, with their growing revenues, particularly for mobile? With no signs of stopping yet?

    Don't you think that FB had/has a plan for monetizing WhatsApp? Everyone wants to wring their hands about the deal. Sure, $19 billion is insane, from a normal perspective. But if Facebook can monetize each user for $2, isn't that around $1 billion given the current amount of users, and this just from user fees. Now, if they can introduce unobtrusive ads, or use some way to make ad revenue on WhatsApps itself, that $19 billion may end up looking like a good deal.

    Don't forget, only $3 billion is in cash. The rest in stock, which in reality is not costing FB anything, since they are simply printing more stock.

  • Report this Comment On March 25, 2014, at 11:55 AM, HectorLemans wrote:

    "The rest in stock, which in reality is not costing FB anything, since they are simply printing more stock."

    Did I just teleport to the late 90's? Stock should actually stand for something. It's not just paper you print and hand out.

  • Report this Comment On March 25, 2014, at 6:02 PM, annaarron wrote:

    Facebook recent $19 billion acquisition of WhatsApp may have many speculating that the company is going to lose big bucks on the deal but http://goo.gl/aFhDtY

  • Report this Comment On March 25, 2014, at 9:48 PM, hennrymark70 wrote:

    Facebook reported revenues of $2.02 billion for third quarter of fiscal year 2013, topping consensus estimates of $1.91 billion the same year

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2868761, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/20/2014 5:32:02 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement