Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Valuing SolarCity and Buying Some More

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

This article is part of our Real-Money Stock Pick series.

SolarCity (NASDAQ: SCTY  ) is turning out to be quite an exciting stock. I first bought it for my Messed-Up Expectations portfolio (the real-money portfolio I run on behalf of The Motley Fool) early last September. It ran up as much as 196% before falling back down within the last month or so.

With the 2013 financial statements finally released, I've updated my model and now have a sense of whether today's price, down about 25% from its high, is a decent price to add to my position or not. I think it is.

If you recall, SolarCity installs solar panels on the top of homes and businesses and sells the electricity to the customer through a 20-year lease at a rate that is below current and (more important) expected future utility rates. It's been financing operations by bundling the tax benefits from this into securities and selling those to big banks. It's transitioning to bundling the future lease cash flows into securities and selling those instead, similar to what power utilities do.

Because of the weird way the financial statements reflect the company's business, I have to use its metric of retained value (RV), which is the present value of the future lease payments minus certain costs. This would essentially be the value of the business if it just halted new installations and ran out existing contracts. Currently, the market is pricing SolarCity at about 5.4 times the last reported RV of $1.05 billion, which means a fair amount of growth is priced into today's market cap.

Estimating future retained value
Because RV is a discounted cash flow number, but I don't have the annual cash flows SolarCity is using to calculate it, I have to back into calculating RV. My model tries to project what RV will be five years from now by growing MW installed each year (with a declining growth rate) along with growing estimated nominal payments remaining from current and new contracts. From that, comparing how RV has tracked with MW installed over the past three years, and looking at how the company has divided RV between "under energy contract" and "renewal" (it includes cash flows from customers renewing their leases for an additional 10 years, assuming all customers will do so), I can project future RV. Comparing that to today's market cap gives me a sense of where the company stands in valuation.

There are three big levers to this model: The rate of annual growth for MW installed (higher growth leads to higher RV); the percentage of customers renewing their leases for an additional 10 years (the company assumes 100%, I assume 33%); and the market multiple assigned to the future RV (a lower multiple implies less company growth priced in by the market).

The company currently estimates to install 500 MW this year (at the midpoint of 2014 guidance), which is 79% growth over 2013. If I drop that growth rate by 33% per year through 2018, it will install just shy of 1,500 MW in that last year. This implies $5.28 billion in RV in 2018 (with a 33% renewal assumption). If I give that a 1.1 times multiple -- which means the company would pretty much enter "run-off" mode (no more growth, run out current contracts) -- that implies a market cap of $5.8 billion, pretty close to today's $5.73 billion.

Three controlling levers
I mentioned three levers affecting projected RV in my model. Holding all else equal for each of the following scenarios, increasing customer renewal rate to 50% from 33% (still well below the company's 100% assumption), 2018's RV climbs to $6.2 billion. If the growth in MW installed declines by 11% per year instead of 33% (ending at 50% 2018 year-over-year growth instead of 16%), 2018 RV leaps up to $8.89 billion. And if I give it a two times multiple instead of 1.1 times, RV goes to $10.56 billion, almost twice today's market cap.

Of the three, the model is most sensitive to the market multiple to RV. When I first purchased shares, it was at a multiple of 3.5 times. Today, thanks to a higher reported RV and a higher market multiple to that, the share price is much higher. If my model is correct in every respect except for underestimating what the market is willing to price the worth of RV, a purchase today could lead to very satisfying returns.

Of course, my model won't be correct. Hopefully, I've made it conservative enough, though, by cutting the annual MW installed growth rates enough, cutting the assumed lease extension rate enough, and lowering the market multiple to RV enough that most surprises will be to the upside.

I'll be buying more shares of SolarCity for the MUE portfolio as soon as Fool trading rules allow. Feel free to come to the portfolio's discussion board for more insight into what I and other Fools are thinking about this exciting company.

Three stock picks to ride America's energy bonanza
Record oil and natural gas production is revolutionizing the United States' energy position. Finding the right plays while historic amounts of capital expenditures are flooding the industry will pad your investment nest egg. For this reason, The Motley Fool is offering a comprehensive look at three energy companies set to soar during this transformation in the energy industry. To find out which three companies are spreading their wings, check out the special free report, "3 Stocks for the American Energy Bonanza." Don't miss out on this timely opportunity; click here to access your report -- it's absolutely free. 

Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (19)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 25, 2014, at 4:45 PM, LiRocket wrote:

    Jim - thanks for your uncluttered simple analysis. Any thoughts on what the market share would be like if SCTY continues to grow at 33% for the next 4-5 years.

    Separately, I would hesitate to add a multiple on a discounted cash flow value. The DCF value already captures the implicit growth assumption and adding a multiple to that simple means that are expecting more growth than factored into the DCF.

  • Report this Comment On March 25, 2014, at 5:29 PM, ronwiserinvestor wrote:

    Here's more bad news for the solar lease and PPA companies. The largest $0 down PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) financing program is ready to launch in California.

    Operated under the auspices of the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (CSCDA), the CaliforniaFIRST residential PACE program will launch this summer in 17 California counties and 167 cities, and makes solar projects more affordable and accessible for millions of California homeowners.

    Offering no money down financing, tax deductible interest payments and re-payment through one's property tax bill, this innovation financing program will for the most part, probably put an end to expensive solar lease and PPA financing in the state of California.

    The PACE financing mechanism was first pioneered by the City of Berkeley for its residential owners in 2008 and has since spread to over 30 states.

  • Report this Comment On March 26, 2014, at 1:28 PM, coptermech66 wrote:

    Well I keep holding and I keep losing. Starting to wonder about this stock!

  • Report this Comment On March 27, 2014, at 2:39 AM, MrMonopoly wrote:

    "minus certain costs"

    Which is debt and other obligations?

  • Report this Comment On March 27, 2014, at 8:23 AM, TMFTortoise wrote:

    Hi MrMonopoly,

    Essentially, yes.

    Here's the definition from SolarCity: “Retained Value under Energy Contract”

    represents the forecasted net present value of Nominal Contracted Payments Remaining and estimated performance-based incentives allocated to us, net of amounts we are obligated to distribute to our fund investors, upfront rebates, depreciation, renewable energy certificates, solar renewable energy certificates

    and estimated operations and maintenance, insurance, administrative and inverter replacement costs. This metric includes Energy Contracts for solar energy systems deployed and in Backlog.



Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2889589, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/29/2015 5:14:09 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Jim Mueller

Jim is a Senior Analyst for Stock Advisor, Options, and the portfolio lead for the Phoenix 1 portfolio in Supernova.

Today's Market

updated 19 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,643.01 -11.76 -0.07%
S&P 500 1,988.87 1.21 0.06%
NASD 4,828.33 15.62 0.32%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

8/28/2015 4:00 PM
SCTY $48.00 Up +1.77 +3.83%
SolarCity CAPS Rating: ****