Will 2014 Mean the End of ‘Cheap Money?’

Despite strong trending, the economy may not be able to sustain itself just yet

Mar 25, 2014 at 1:30PM

Janet Yellen may be a departure from recent Federal Reserve chairpersons, but she recently showed her relative inexperience as she stumbled through her first press conference. Failing to clarify previously made comments on the health of the U.S. market, bond markets fell as the new chairwoman's offhand remarks helped drive the Dow Jones Industrial Average down nearly 150 points.

Make no mistake, Yellen is an excellent economist, but the garbled message she delivered to the public begs the question: will 2014 be the year when the U.S. cuts its supply of cheap money? 

What's cheap money?
Cheap money refers to a market condition in which a given economy seeks to stimulate growth by creating employment opportunities. This is accomplished by lowering reserve requirements for banks (that is, the amount of money banks need to have on hand to cover day-to-day transactions), which in turn allows banks to give out more credit in the form of loans. Aided by lower interest rates, cheap money is great for a struggling economy, but less helpful for naturally growing economies (as it can potentially lead to economic bubbles). 

The economy has been rebounding since the beginning of 2014. With wages up and 175,000 new jobs created in February, American markets seem to be warming themselves up nicely in the wake of deep snow and miserable weather. With the ongoing taper potentially ending late this year, one could argue that interest rates need to rise to give the economy room to expand, without an artificial boost from monetary policy.

Given that the 175,000 jobs created last month represents a three-month low (and this workforce expansion came in the face of the weather), the economy is definitely on a good path. With unemployment falling below Yellen's benchmark of 6.5% (although this has recently been abandoned in favor of a currently unknown figure), the economy is recovering, but it may not be time to consider raising rates.

Is that such a bad thing?
That being said, Federal Reserve recent reports indicate that it will raise rates by at least 1% by the end of 2015 and to 2.25% by the end of 2016. While this does not seem like a marked increase, this would make U.S. bonds more attractive, at least in the short term. Short-term yields are already up to a 6-month high of .448%, but with longer-term bonds more minimal in their growth, investors are worried that a rise in interest rates will slow inflation in the long term.

While low inflation is good, having inflation too low will stagnate the economy and remove the forward progress the Fed's moves have made in recent months. With U.S. inflation at just over 1% in February, the recent surge in the economy may not yet be enough to create a self-sustaining cycle. That is, government intervention (in the form of low rates) may show the economy to be less strong than it seems, and allow for another slowdown. 

Is 2014 the end of cheap money?
In my opinion -- no. The U.S., though continuing to recover, is not yet ready for raised interest rates. This is not the fault of Yellen's comments, although her remarks did expose the tenuousness of the economy. Rather, this is due to unmanageable factors such as the weather (still affecting areas of the country with freak snowstorms and adverse conditions). 

What 2014 may be is a barometer for measuring the potential for future interest rates. 2015 may be the year to tighten the money supply, but higher Federal rates now may not be the best medicine for our economy.

The next step for you
Want to profit on business analysis like this? The key for your future is to turn business insights into portfolio gold through smart and steady investing … starting right now. Those who wait on the sidelines are missing out on huge gains and putting their financial futures in jeopardy. The Motley Fool is offering a new special report, an essential guide to investing, which includes access to top stocks to buy now. Click here to get your copy today -- it's absolutely free.

A Financial Plan on an Index Card

Keeping it simple.

Aug 7, 2015 at 11:26AM

Two years ago, University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack wrote his entire financial plan on an index card.

It blew up. People loved the idea. Financial advice is often intentionally complicated. Obscurity lets advisors charge higher fees. But the most important parts are painfully simple. Here's how Pollack put it:

The card came out of chat I had regarding what I view as the financial industry's basic dilemma: The best investment advice fits on an index card. A commenter asked for the actual index card. Although I was originally speaking in metaphor, I grabbed a pen and one of my daughter's note cards, scribbled this out in maybe three minutes, snapped a picture with my iPhone, and the rest was history.

More advisors and investors caught onto the idea and started writing their own financial plans on a single index card.

I love the exercise, because it makes you think about what's important and forces you to be succinct.

So, here's my index-card financial plan:


Everything else is details. 

Something big just happened

I don't know about you, but I always pay attention when one of the best growth investors in the world gives me a stock tip. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner (whose growth-stock newsletter was rated #1 in the world by The Wall Street Journal)* and his brother, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner, just revealed two brand new stock recommendations moments ago. Together, they've tripled the stock market's return over 12+ years. And while timing isn't everything, the history of Tom and David's stock picks shows that it pays to get in early on their ideas.

Click here to be among the first people to hear about David and Tom's newest stock recommendations.

*"Look Who's on Top Now" appeared in The Wall Street Journal which references Hulbert's rankings of the best performing stock picking newsletters over a 5-year period from 2008-2013.

Compare Brokers