Does This Energy ETF Have the Juice?

Taking a closer look at the components of the iShares U.S. Energy ETF.

Mar 28, 2014 at 10:50AM

Not all energy ETFs are created equal. Based on the securities they hold and their respective percentage allocations, they can achieve very different results. In this first of three articles on the subject, I will dissect the major holdings of the iShares U.S. Energy ETF (NYSEMKT:IYE) to see if it's right for your portfolio.

First, let's talk returns. Since the inception of the fund the IYE has slightly underperformed the Dow Jones U.S. Gas and Oil Index.

DurationIYE Returns as %Index Returns as %
1 Month 2.88 2.92
3 Months 7.71 7.84
6 Months 14.04 14.30
1 Year 25.70 26.14
3 Years 10.79 11.20
5 Years 14.01 14.06
10 Years 13.35 13.81
Since Inception 9.88 10.34

Table created by author with information from BlackRock iShares

Notice the iShares U.S. Energy ETF loses to the Dow Jones U.S. Gas and Oil Index in every category. Compounding this slight underperformance is an annual 0.45% expense ratio. Those small percentages really add up over the long run.

But past performance isn't necessarily a reliable way to predict the future. For a better idea of what the future holds it would be wise to examine the top holdings and see exactly what they have in store. 

While the ETF is composed of 85 different stocks, two names dominate this ETF, composing 34.18% of total holdings. They are ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) at 22.20% and Chevron (NYSE:CVX) at 11.98%.

ExxonMobil seems to have stumbled recently following its full-year 2013 results and news that it plans on curtailing capital spending for 2014. Let's take a closer look at the 2013 results and current valuation before we get to the future of ExxonMobil.

In 2013 ExxonMobil earned $32.5 billion, down $12.3 billion or 27% from 2012. Earnings per share decreased 24% to $7.37. Oil-equivalent production was down 1.5%.

Besides the dismal earnings for 2013, ExxonMobil appears to be overvalued compared to industry averages.

MetricExxonMobilIndustry Average
P/E  12.80  10.60
P/S  .96 .62 
P/B  2.35  1.54
Yield  2.70%  4.90%
Sales-5 year growth rate  4.50  10.51

Table created by author with data from The Motley Fool

The metrics show that investors buying now are paying a premium for a lower-than-average yield and slower sales growth.

But it's not all bad news for ExxonMobil, which boasts higher-than-average ROI, ROA, gross margins, and profit margins. This should help insulate the company a bit from the slower than average growth and decreasing capex.

Still, investors purchasing ExxonMobil today are paying a premium for a stock that is offering below-average yields and stagnant EPS growth over the next two years. Not the best investment in my humble opinion.

But could Chevron be the iShares U.S. Energy ETF's saving grace?

Let's start with past performance again. Chevron has been seeing declining revenues and earnings over the past few years. Revenue in 2011 totaled $244.37 billion, in 2012 revenue came in at $235.02, and in 2013 totaled $221.32. That's nearly a 10% decrease in revenue over the past few years. Earnings suffered even more with 2011 EPS at $13.54, 2012 EPS at $13.42, and 2013 down to $11.18. That is a 17.5% decline over the last three years in EPS.

But valuations look slightly more attractive than ExxonMobil's.

MetricChevronIndustry Average
P/E  10.4  10.60
P/S 1.00 .62 
P/B  1.48  1.54
Yield  3.50%  4.90%
Sales-5 year growth rate  0.88  10.51

Table created by author with data from The Motley Fool

While the investor seems to be getting a better deal based on these valuations, the five-year sales growth rate raises a huge red flag, especially if that trend is set to continue into the future and manifest into flat or even declining earnings.

Sadly, analysts believe that is exactly what will happen with FY 2014 EPS seeing only a 1.15% bump over FY 2013 to $11.22, and FY 2015 actually declining 1.00% to $11.16 EPS. So, basically, as with ExxonMobil, we are looking at flat growth over the next couple years if the consensus holds.

The conclusion is an easy one. The two major holdings of the iShares U.S. Energy ETF look to be facing stagnant earnings growth in the foreseeable future. They are also paying less than stellar yields, and ExxonMobil appears overvalued in light of this. Wise investors should hold on this particular ETF for now. 

OPEC is absolutely terrified of this game-changer
Imagine a company that rents a very specific and valuable piece of machinery for $41,000… per hour (that’s almost as much as the average American makes in a year!). And Warren Buffett is so confident in this company’s can’t-live-without-it business model, he just loaded up on 8.8 million shares. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report reveals the company we’re calling OPEC’s Worst Nightmare. Just click HERE to uncover the name of this industry-leading stock… and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable LANDSLIDE of profits!


James Catlin has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Chevron. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information