After Earnings, Is Walgreen More Attractive Than Its Peers?

Walgreen reported earnings that fell shy of analyst expectations but shares still rallied. Is the company still an amazing opportunity, or should the Foolish investor consider CVS or Rite Aid instead?

Mar 29, 2014 at 10:00AM


Source: Wikimedia Commons

After Walgreen (NASDAQ:WBA) on March 25 announced that it matched on revenue but fell short on earnings, shares of the world's second-largest publicly traded drugstore chain rose 3%. This came days after Cantor Fitzgerald downgraded the stock to a sell rating and claimed the business would be fairly valued at $50 per share. Based on the business' performance following earnings, though, shareholders appear to disagree. Given this disparity in opinion, should the Foolish investor consider buying into Walgreen, or are analysts right about its dour prospects?

Walgreen couldn't match on earnings but met revenue expectations
For the quarter, Walgreen announced revenue of $19.6 billion. This represents a 5% gain compared to the $18.6 billion the company announced in the year-ago quarter and matched analyst expectations. In its report, management attributed the sales increase to two factors; higher comparable-store sales and a greater number of locations in operation.

According to the company's earnings release, the primary driver behind its rising sales was the 4.3% jump in comparable-store sales. This improvement compared to the second quarter of its 2013 fiscal year has been chalked up, for the most part, to a 3.4% rise in basket size and a 5.8% increase in comparable-store sales for prescriptions. Another factor behind Walgreen's sales jump was its higher store count. Over the past year, the retailer added 138 drugstores to its roster.

While Walgreen was successful in pleasing investors on the search for revenue growth, it disappointed on the profit front. For the quarter, the company saw its earnings per share come in at $0.78. This is $0.01 lower than last year's results and fell 16% below the $0.93 analysts hoped to see.

Despite benefiting from rising sales, Walgreen was negatively affected by higher costs. The main detriment to the business was its cost of goods sold, which rose from 69.9% of sales to 71.2%. Both pharmacy and front-end operations were hurt, as the company faced a less severe flu season, a decline in generic drugs compared to a year earlier, and a greater investment in promotions.

How does Walgreen compare to its peers?
Between 2010 and 2013, Walgreen was able to grow its revenue by 7% from $67.4 billion to $72.2 billion. This is a fairly solid performance, but how does the company fare when stacked up against CVS Caremark (NYSE:CVS) and Rite Aid (NYSE:RAD)?

  2013 Revenue (billions) 2010 Revenue (billions) Improvement
Walgreen $72.2 $67.4 7.1%
CVS Caremark $126.8 $95.8 32.3%
Rite Aid $25.4 $25.7 -1.1%

Source: Walgreen, CVS, and Rite Aid

When it comes to revenue growth, the poster child in the industry has been, without a doubt, CVS. Over the past four years, the world's largest drugstore chain saw its revenue soar 32% from $95.8 billion to $126.8 billion. In its annual report, management said that higher comparable-store sales and a greater store count were the main drivers behind its jump in sales.

The situation for Rite Aid hasn't been so pretty. Over the past four years, the smallest of the big-three drugstore chains saw its top line contract 1% from $25.7 billion to $25.4 billion. As opposed to Walgreen and CVS, both of which have focused on growing their retail outlets, Rite Aid has consolidated operations and focused on improving its bottom line.

Examining revenue alone, it may seem as though CVS is the better prospect, but the picture isn't quite that clear. From a profitability perspective, CVS has done the best, as evidenced by its net profit margin hovering at around 3.6%, but Walgreen has been catching up.

  2013 Net Profit Margin 2010 Net Profit Margin
Walgreen 3.4% 3.1%
CVS Caremark 3.6% 3.6%
Rite Aid 0.5% -2%

Source: Walgreen, CVS, and Rite Aid

Between 2010 and 2013, Walgreen's net profit margin ticked up modestly from 3.1% to 3.4%. This data suggests that CVS has focused more on growing its top line, while Walgreen's main emphasis has been on increasing revenue while achieving margin improvement.

Rite Aid is another creature entirely. Over the same period noted above, the company has seen its net profit margin improve drastically from -2% to 0.5%. Although this is a great deal worse than its larger rivals, the company's struggle to consolidate its operations and return from years of net losses to profitability is beginning to bear fruit.

Foolish takeaway
In spite of Walgreen's mediocre second-quarter results, shareholders appear to be hopeful about where the business is headed. This should provide the Foolish investor with a fairly safe prospect. But if high growth is what you are looking for, then CVS may be a better opportunity. Probably the most interesting company though, is Rite Aid. Over the past four years, the business has seen its revenue fall, but the rising margins point toward a company that could create great value if the trend continues.

Boost your 2014 returns with The Motley Fool's top stock
There’s a huge difference between a good stock and a stock that can make you rich. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it’s one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Daniel Jones has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends CVS Caremark. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information