Is the Bull Phase of the Commodity Super-Cycle Over?

With China's economy slowing significantly, are there any reasons to own commodity producers?

Mar 30, 2014 at 2:21PM

Many investment banks, with Goldman Sachs among them, say that the bull phase of the commodity super-cycle is over.

Commodity super-cycles generally last 30 to 40 years. There is an initial 15 to 20 year phase where demand outstrips supply, and a later 15 year phase where supply outstrips demand. In the first phase of the current commodity cycle, many metal, energy, and agricultural commodities have doubled in price since 2000. 

Over the past several years, however, prices have been, at best, range-bound. This has led to many market pundits declaring that the bull phase of the commodity super-cycle is over. So what's causing prices to stay range-bound, and are there any compelling reasons to own commodity producers?

China is key to the commodity super-cycle
For a decade and half, China was the factory of the world.

With its large rural population, the country had an almost unlimited supply of labor that kept wages low. Factories combined that cheap labor and foreign direct investment to make low-cost products that China exported all around the world. With that export income, China developed its infrastructure and industrialized.  Because labor and capital remained cheap, China's appetite for commodities grew to an unprecedented scale and led to one of the great commodity bull markets in history. 

 Microsoft Powerpoint Chartbook March

Source: Rio Tinto 

In recent years, however, the market dynamics have changed. Chinese labor wages have increased greatly. Chinese growth has slowed dramatically from a bursting credit bubble. The three proxies for Chinese economy -- rail cargo volume, electricity consumption, and bank lending -- are all weak. 

Chinese demand for commodities, the underlying reason for the rise in prices, is no longer as strong as before, and the good times of double-digit annual price increases are over. The bull phase of the commodity super-cycle certainly looks over.  

The bottom line
While the short-term picture doesn't look good, there are still good long-term reasons to own commodity producers.

Despite China's recent slowdown, long-term demand for commodities hasn't changed. There are many other emerging nations besides China that need to industrialize. Experts predict that 70 million people will enter the middle class every year. As more people enter the middle class, commodity demand will increase.

Besides getting exposure to emerging markets, owning quality commodity producers could also be a hedge against unanticipated inflation, which may occur because of the Federal Reserve's large balance sheet. 

I think owning low-cost producers with quality management makes sense. Some companies that come to mind are Rio Tinto plc (NYSE:RIO)BHP Billiton (NYSE:BBL), and Freeport mcMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc (NYSE:FCX)

All three producers are profitable, well diversified companies that trade at reasonable valuations. The three are also reducing debt and controlling costs. 

If commodity prices rise dramatically again, owning the three producers offers significant upside. If commodity prices remain range-bound, owning the three producers will net a nice dividend yield. China's economy may have more downside left, but in the long term owning quality commodity producers still looks like a good bet.

Boost your 2014 returns with The Motley Fool's top stock
There's a huge difference between a good stock and a stock that can make you rich. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it's one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.


Jay Yao has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

A Financial Plan on an Index Card

Keeping it simple.

Aug 7, 2015 at 11:26AM

Two years ago, University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack wrote his entire financial plan on an index card.

It blew up. People loved the idea. Financial advice is often intentionally complicated. Obscurity lets advisors charge higher fees. But the most important parts are painfully simple. Here's how Pollack put it:

The card came out of chat I had regarding what I view as the financial industry's basic dilemma: The best investment advice fits on an index card. A commenter asked for the actual index card. Although I was originally speaking in metaphor, I grabbed a pen and one of my daughter's note cards, scribbled this out in maybe three minutes, snapped a picture with my iPhone, and the rest was history.

More advisors and investors caught onto the idea and started writing their own financial plans on a single index card.

I love the exercise, because it makes you think about what's important and forces you to be succinct.

So, here's my index-card financial plan:


Everything else is details. 

Something big just happened

I don't know about you, but I always pay attention when one of the best growth investors in the world gives me a stock tip. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner (whose growth-stock newsletter was rated #1 in the world by The Wall Street Journal)* and his brother, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner, just revealed two brand new stock recommendations moments ago. Together, they've tripled the stock market's return over 12+ years. And while timing isn't everything, the history of Tom and David's stock picks shows that it pays to get in early on their ideas.

Click here to be among the first people to hear about David and Tom's newest stock recommendations.

*"Look Who's on Top Now" appeared in The Wall Street Journal which references Hulbert's rankings of the best performing stock picking newsletters over a 5-year period from 2008-2013.

Compare Brokers