Is Magnum Hunter Resources' Acreage Worth Drilling?

Magnum Hunter Resources Corp.'s (NYSE: MHR  ) balance sheet may prove to be a hindrance to its ambitious growth plans despite natural gas prices moving north. But if state geological reports are to be believed, its core holdings may not be in the sweet spot of the Utica Shale play.

A natural gas rig in the Marcellus formation. Source: Wikipedia

Following the successful production exploits of Antero Resources Corp. (NYSE: AR  ) , Magnum's decision to focus on developing its Utica and Marcellus acreage this year sounds like a solid strategy, at least on paper. But a glance through its balance sheet raises the question of whether the Houston-based Magnum Hunter has the resources to actually pull it off. At the moment, the company's balance sheet looks less than stellar.

How the company has been financing its operations
For 2014, Magnum Hunter Resources plans to spend $400 million as capital expenditure, of which 65% is allocated to developing the Utica and Marcellus shale plays. However, with only $41.7 million cash in hand and a revolving credit facility of $218 million due in 2016, meeting these expenses looks like a tall order.

Last year, cash proceeds from sale of assets came to $506 million, and to a large extent, this helped the company fund its capital expenditure of $631.5 million. This year shouldn't be much different. Management is looking forward to further divesting $400 million worth of non-core assets with sales of $69.5 million already executed in the first two months. This should definitely help. However, a delay in executing these divestitures could hurt the company's future drilling plans.

At the beginning of this year, Magnum had negative working capital with a net working capital ratio of 0.66. This is worse than the previous year's ratio of 0.84.

According to its annual report, among planned divestitures are properties in the southern Appalachian Basin in Kentucky and Tennessee, as well as the Canadian operations of Williston Hunter Canada, a wholly owned subsidiary of the company. But investors must keep in mind that not all these divestitures have been profitable. Last year, Magnum recognized a net loss of $44.6 million on sale of assets. This is over and above the $97 million expense in exploration and abandonment activities, thanks to expired leases on properties that the company did not choose to develop. Additionally, depreciation, depletion, and amortization costs increased almost 40% to $99 million. It seems that Magnum's acreage may not be that exciting.

A risky investment
Back in 2009, Magnum had acquired the privately held Triad Energy from going bankrupt for about $81 million. This included about 88,000 net mineral acres in Ohio, West Virginia, and Kentucky. Approximately, 47,000 net acres cover the Marcellus Shale play that is now a part of the company's core acreage holding.

However, compared to the likes of the Bakken and the Eagle Ford, the Utica is still far from being a prolific oil and gas play. While the latter has seemingly garnered a lot of attention as America's next hottest shale play, it is yet to witness high-volume producing wells on a consistent basis. According to various reports, the Utica shale's "sweet spot" is turning out to be smaller than initially thought, and the oil-rich window is concentrated in a narrow belt. The question is: Does Magnum's acreage fall in that sweet spot?

According to a former chief geologist from Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Larry Wickstrom, the real hot spot on the play could be more to the south than originally thought. According to him, the narrow belt runs from Carroll County in the north, moving down to Harrison County, followed by a little of Guernsey in the east, and down into Noble County. He additionally mentions that Monroe, Jefferson, and Belmont counties are potentially rich in dry gas. The following chart from the Ohio DNR gives a clear picture:

Source: Ohio Department of Natural Resources.

So where does Magnum Hunter stand? Most of the company's holdings are further south -- in the Noble and Washington counties. However, its Monroe county acreage has shown promise. In February, the Stalder wells (in Monroe County) have tested to a peak rate of 32.5 million cubic feet per day, or Mmcf/d, of natural gas. In the month of March, the company is anticipating a net incremental production of 6,000 to 8,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, or Boe/d.

Of course, Utica's sweet spot could be extending further south than already anticipated. Until a consistent production pattern is established, the current inferences are still nothing more than "educated guesses." However, the next 12 months should most probably bring a confirmation.

A Foolish takeaway
While the latest update on production increment is a positive development, it's still a long way from Magnum's targeted exit production of 35,000 Boe/d for 2014. The targeted divestures must soon take place in order to meet working capital requirements. But most importantly, as production and sales volumes grow, management must address its balance sheet concerns.

Invest in America's growing energy renaissance by exploiting this "loophole"
You already know record oil and natural gas production is revolutionizing the United States' energy position. But what you probably haven't heard is that the IRS is encouraging investors to support our growing energy renaissance. For this reason, The Motley Fool is offering a look at three energy companies using this small IRS "loophole". Take advantage of this profitable opportunity by grabbing your brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You To Make This Energy Investment." Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to access your report -- it's absolutely free. 


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 31, 2014, at 8:23 PM, anilizer wrote:

    The author sounds like they didn't even read the March 14 update on Utica and Marcellus

  • Report this Comment On April 01, 2014, at 12:12 AM, beast wrote:

    Huge growth in this company... nothing but upside... 11.50 by close of buis, Friday...Charles payne is all in ... quit sittin on your hands !!!!!!!

  • Report this Comment On April 01, 2014, at 9:50 AM, nmlobo6 wrote:

    When did Motley Fool become amateur hour? I don't have the time or energy to pick this article apart, but this ones a joke. Shame on you Motley Fool shame on you.

  • Report this Comment On April 04, 2014, at 11:00 AM, wescileppi wrote:

    Stopped reading Motley Fool a long time ago but this headline interested me. Living in Northern Washington County, I am watching the wells being drilled with excitement. The author doesn't know of what he speaks. The Farley, Garvin, and Stalder wells are excellent/superb. Buying more MHR and AR today.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2896374, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/31/2014 9:43:52 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement