Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Bouncing on Phase 2 Success

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Idera Pharmaceuticals' (NASDAQ: IDRA  ) stock market rollercoaster ride left it partially recovered from its 25% plunge just over a week ago upon FDA approval of a competing product developed by Celgene  (NASDAQ: CELG  ) . Idera's plaque psoriasis candidate, IMO-8400, gave good results for safety and efficacy in a phase 2 trial, but the stock remains at half mast, as investors are unconvinced by Idera's story in a marketplace crowded with psoriasis options.

Phase 2 good but not great
Idera ran its double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial in 32 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with a primary goal of showing safety and tolerability of IMO-8400 with 12 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoint was efficacy as measured by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI).

All three dose levels of the drug were safe and well-tolerated, which is an absolute necessity to be really competitive in the psoriasis market. Currently available therapies include steroids, topical retinoids, vitamin D derivatives, immune suppressants, and TNF-α inhibitors like Amgen and Pfizer's Enbrel. Those therapies carry some significant risks, however, such as kidney failure for the retinoids and cancer for some of the TNF-α inhibitors. A competitive opportunity exists, then, for a therapy that is shown to be safer. By that standard, IMO-8400 so far passes with flying colors.

However, the PASI scores, while good, are not all that might have been hoped for. PASI is a composite of the redness, thickness, and scaling of psoriasis over several regions of the body. In the trial, nine out of 20 patients, or 45%, achieved a 50% reduction (PASI-50), compared to only one out of seven patients in the placebo group. Only four patients, or 20%, achieved a stricter standard, 75% PASI reduction (PASI-75).

Additional clinical results in an expansion cohort of 12 patients based in the Netherlands are due in a couple of months.

No apples to apples comparison
While that certainly indicates some efficacy (in, admittedly, a small sample), it falls short of higher hopes based on an earlier study that handed in PASI improvements in the 35% to 90% range, and it appears weak compared to Celgene's results for newly approved Otezla, which achieved a 33% PASI-75 score with 16 weeks of treatment in the ESTEEM 1 study and 29% in the ESTEEM 2 study.

Although it would have been great for Idera to knock it out of the park with a really high PASI-75 score, ultimately the important takeaway for efficacy is that in this small trial the drug appeared effective and is worth further study. For a number of reasons, numbers are only roughly comparable from one clinical trial to the next and one drug to the next, so lacking a direct, head-to-head trial, it's hard to say which is superior, the drug with 20% PASI-75 after 12 weeks of treatment (IMO-8400) or the drug with a 29%-33% PASI-75 score after 16 weeks of treatment. This is especially true given the small sample size for the IMO-8400 trial.

A proof of concept for TLR antagonists
A successful psoriasis drug could have potential for a billion or more in annual sales, based on Celgene's guidance of up to $2 billion for Otezla. But Idera views its trial results as more than a test of the drug's potential in plaque psoriasis. IMO-8400 is Idera's lead candidate in the class of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7, 8, and 9 antagonists. In addition to psoriasis, Idera is planning to develop IMO-8400 in genetically defined forms of B-cell lymphoma and orphan autoimmune diseases.

The company views the recently completed phase 2 trial as a proof-of-concept for TLR antagonists in autoimmune disease, and as such it may herald more successful drug candidates in more indications in the future. So the trial success suggests that IMO-8400 might not only be a significant player in the plaque psoriasis market, but a first-in-class therapy in cancer and orphan disease if it can continue to perform in clinical trials.

3 stocks poised to be multi-baggers
The one sure way to get wealthy is to invest in a groundbreaking company that goes on to dominate a multibillion-dollar industry. Our analysts have found multi-bagger stocks time and again. And now they think they've done it again with three stock picks that they believe could generate the same type of phenomenal returns. They've revealed these picks in a new free report that you can download instantly by clicking here now.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 01, 2014, at 9:22 PM, matt043 wrote:

    Poorly researched, do you have a clue about what this company is even about? If the writer did, she wouldn't be so fixated on psoriasis...proof of concept, what does mean you think, tired of quack Motley Fool articles

  • Report this Comment On April 01, 2014, at 11:29 PM, pick1998 wrote:

    Worst quality of article. The author even did not spend a few minutes to read the PR and dig a bit deep of the history of trials, or she simply lacks the ability to analyze clinical trial data.

    The data is questionable because the co did not wants to release the scores for each dose. An early trial suggested higher dose may be less effective. If this is true again, it raises serious questions on either the efficacy data or quality of the trial.

    The article suggests that small trial may be blamed for the low efficacy. Does she really think a big trial will produce better efficacy data? To the contrary, a large scale trial will almost always yield worse efficacy and more safety problems. We have already seen the data is deteriorating.

    Is she qualified to write an essay on a trial?

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2899211, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/30/2015 2:13:21 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Catherine Shaffer

Catherine Shaffer is a freelance biotech writer with a background in biochemistry and pharmaceutical research. Having received early training in laboratory wetwork, she transitioned to science communication. She specializes in the biotech industry--where cutting edge science intersects the business world--with the goal of keeping all of its various stakeholders (scientists, investors, patients) informed and up to date on developments in a rapidly shifting landscape. She has covered the industry for more than ten years, writing news and features for science and trade journals.

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,643.01 -11.76 -0.07%
S&P 500 1,988.87 1.21 0.06%
NASD 4,828.33 15.62 0.32%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

8/28/2015 4:00 PM
IDRA $2.92 Up +0.03 +1.04%
Idera Pharmaceutic… CAPS Rating: **
CELG $124.04 Up +1.00 +0.81%
Celgene CAPS Rating: *****