Is Miguel Cabrera’s New Contract the Worst in Baseball?

Miguel Cabrera is set to make a boatload of money. How does his new contract compare to other mega-deals in the MLB?

Apr 1, 2014 at 11:39AM

The Detroit Tigers signed Miguel Cabrera to a massive contract extension last week. The slugger will make $292 million over the next 12 years, which is more money per at-bat than the median household income of Michigan, according to ESPN's Darren Rovell. On the surface, the deal looks overwhelmingly expensive, something many pundits have harped on over the past few days. The numbers tell a different story.

He's hardly overpaid ... for now
When his extension begins in 2016, Cabrera will have the largest average annual salary among all non-pitchers in the MLB. But that doesn't mean he's overpaid. Compared to other highly paid hitters, his contract, at least in terms of immediate value this season, is reasonable.

Screen Shot

Data via Spotrac, FanGraphs. Chart compiled by author. *Annual average begins in 2016, when extension starts. **Annual average begins in 2015, when extension starts. ***Calculated by multiplying projected 2014 WAR (using ZiPS methodology) and the average value of an MLB win above replacement ($5.2M). For a basic explanation of WAR, read this article.

More often than not, the highest paid players appear to be overvalued. Over half of the top 20 -- those in red in the chart above -- likely won't deliver the output their salaries demand this season. And among this group, only a few look to be significantly underpaid. If Mike Trout, for example, plays as well in 2014 as he has the past two seasons, his production will be worth over $40 million!

The longer-term picture
Of course, a multiyear contract cannot be judged in the short run alone. Overpaid players like Matt Kemp, Carl Crawford, and Mark Teixeira once had lofty projections before the injury bug bit. At the age of 30, Cabrera's numbers look nice now, but what if he, too, gets hurt or experiences a drop off in performance? 

Deadspin recently attempted to find an answer.


Graph via Regressing-Deadspin, by Reuben Fischer-Baum.

As the outlet explains, it's possible that, due to age, "Cabrera will get worse ... but the price of a win will also inflate, at something like 5% per year." Thus, he's worth $213 million through 2025 under the assumption that the average cost of an MLB win is $5.2 million, something many analysts agree on. Because Cabrera will make significantly more than that -- $292 million -- from his contract, this point of view sees him as overpaid. 

On the other hand, there's reason to believe an MLB win could be worth more. Lewie Pollis of SB Nation pegs it at $7 million, and as Nate Silver recently wrote, $6.5 million is also reasonable. Deadspin's "optimistic model" incorporates Pollis' value, and if that's the case, Cabrera's production should far exceed his contract -- by about 30%.

These figures also assume a clean bill of health. While Cabrera has averaged 157 games per year since 2004 -- his first full season -- the slugger is nearly 31. And whether it's Albert Pujols or Alex Rodriguez, plenty of previously bulletproof players have experienced major, career-altering injuries in their thirties. If Cabrera misses just one full year of his deal, the numbers begin to work against the Tigers.

Going beyond the statistics
In the search to determine the true value of Cabrera's deal, two factors don't show up in the statistics: position scarcity and Detroit's desire to win.

The former is a term that appears in fantasy baseball, and it's equally as useful in the real world. Put simply, it's the idea that depending on a player's position, he may be worth more, or less, to his club.

In 2013, there were only seven truly "elite" third basemen who generated a WAR above 5.0. That same season, nearly twice as many outfielders broke the 5.0-WAR barrier. Although Cabrera moved to first base this year, he's still skilled enough to play the hot corner, a position the Tigers say he'll probably return to in interleague games. Because of position scarcity at third base then, it's justifiable to think Cabrera's production is worth more per win than the average MLB player.

Detroit's desire to win may also skew things. The team has won the AL Central in three consecutive years, but has come up short where it counts: the postseason. The Tigers haven't won a World Series since 1984, and with its roster largely unchanged -- save for a swap of Prince Fielder for Ian Kinsler -- it certainly has the chance to do it this season.

That, and one of the most supportive fan bases in the league, made it more prudent for Detroit to extend Cabrera than if he played for, say, the Houston Astros. With revenue of $262 million, the team was eighth in baseball last year according to Forbes, and home attendance ranked sixth. Cabrera sells a ton of jerseys too -- he regularly ranks among the top 15. The Tigers clearly had both the financial ability and justification to lock him up through 2025.


Image via Roger DeWitt, Flickr.

The bottom line
Baseball is back, and at least for this season, Miguel Cabrera's mammoth contract appears fair. It's always a risk to give $30 million a year to a player past the age of 30, but Detroit would've been ridiculed if they didn't lock him up beyond 2015. Because of its commitment to the slugger, the team should remain a World Series contender for years to come.

Injuries obviously happen, though, which is why playing in the American League can help the Tigers. As he ages, I wouldn't be surprised if Cabrera eventually becomes a full-time designated hitter. The model has worked well for the Boston Red Sox and David Ortiz, and it's not like fans come to the ballpark to see Cabrera play defense.

Is it a lot of money to shell out for Cabrera? Sure. Is it among the worst deals in the league? Not by a long shot.

The next step for any baseball fan
Just as there's a gap between Miggy and every other position player on the Tigers, there's a clear difference between a good stock and a stock that can make you rich. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it's one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information