General Motors Company to Congress: We Take the Blame

New CEO Mary Barra hit the right notes in her first day of testimony before Congress.

Apr 2, 2014 at 7:02PM

Barra Before Congress

GM CEO Mary Barra appeared before a U.S. House of Representatives committee panel on Tuesday. Photo credit: General Motors Co.

Tuesday marked a new stage of the recall crisis engulfing General Motors (NYSE:GM): The finger-pointing stage. That's not a knock on GM. CEO Mary Barra, to her immense credit, is not pointing fingers at anyone other than her own organization. 

But as Congress began its hearings into the issue, and as federal regulators frantically sought to deflect blame for their own institutional shortcomings, it was clear on Tuesday that the Blame Game was on.

GM's new CEO isn't playing the Washington blame game
There's plenty of blame to go around, of course. The emerging picture suggests that years of bureaucratic bungles deep inside GM led to a long delay in recalling defective ignition switches, which are believed to have played a part in 13 deaths. 

Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee had plenty of tough questions for Barra, of course. But they also had tough questions for David Friedman, the acting chief of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or NHTSA. The key question for Friedman: Why didn't the NHTSA force GM to do a recall once the pattern of problems started to emerge? 

Friedman pushed the issue -- and the blame -- back on GM, saying that GM hadn't provided NHTSA with enough information to see the patterns. That assertion may be open to dispute as time goes on. There's a fair argument to be made that NHTSA shares some of the blame here, and some members of the committee weren't shy about making it.

Friedman's effort to shift all of the blame back on to GM wasn't surprising. But it made for a dramatic contrast with Barra's calm willingness to apologize and take responsibility. 

Barra shows calm leadership under fierce pressure
Barra continues to shine in what must rank as one of the more challenging situations to land on any brand-new CEO's desk. 

It seems hard to remember now, but when Barra was tapped to become GM's CEO late last year, GM was on a roll. The U.S. government had sold the last of its shares, and GM's recent products were garnering strong reviews. Profits and quality indicators were moving in the right directions. GM's future was finally starting to look bright.

But these recalls have tarnished that emerging shine. Now, the deep flaws of the old GM are being unearthed, and exposed to harsh critical eyes. 

By refusing to be defensive, by insisting on transparency, and by ordering that vehicles be recalled if there's any question about their safety, Barra is absolutely doing the right things -- even if she sometimes seemed vague under harsh questioning on Tuesday. 

Barra clearly doesn't -- yet -- have all of the answers that Congressional leaders, and the public, are seeking. That made her non-answers to pointed questions seem frustrating at times on Tuesday. But she's making the right moves with what she has: She met privately with victims' families on Tuesday morning, and she announced yesterday that GM had retained Kenneth Feinberg, an attorney best known for gracefully managing the September 11th and Boston Marathon bomb victims' funds, to advise GM on how best to proceed in addressing claims related to the ignition-switch defect.

On a larger level, Barra is clearly looking to draw a line between Old GM and New GM -- while making clear that New GM will willingly take at least some responsibility for the mistakes of its predecessor, even though the terms of GM's bankruptcy agreement could let the current company off the hook for claims originating before 2009. That seems like the right strategy. 

So far this year, GM has recalled more than 2.5 million vehicles around the world, for a variety of potential problems. That may seem excessive -- but Barra has clearly decided to face all necessary consequences now, so that GM can move forward later. 

Barra continues to make the right moves for the long-term health of General Motors (and the long-term prospects of GM's stock). But in the short term, it's going to continue to be ugly for GM -- and perhaps for GM's shares, as well. Stay tuned. 

OPEC is absolutely terrified of this game changer
Imagine a company that rents a very specific and valuable piece of machinery for $41,000... per hour. (That's almost as much as the average American makes in a year!). And Warren Buffett is so confident in this company's can't-live-without-it business model, he just loaded up on 8.8 million shares. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report reveals the company we're calling OPEC's Worst Nightmare. Just click HERE to uncover the name of this industry-leading stock... and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable LANDSLIDE of profits!

John Rosevear owns shares of General Motors. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information