What's Next for Cubist Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Durata Therapeutics, Inc.?

Two drugs are hot on Pfizer’s tail.

Apr 4, 2014 at 6:30PM

Cubist Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:CBST) and Durata Therapeutics (NASDAQ:DRTX) both won this week with nods by the FDA's advisory panels on each company's antibacterial agents.

In two unanimous votes, the FDA panels agreed on the safety and efficacy of Cubist's tedizolid and Durata's dalbavancin. Both drugs would compete with Pfizer's (NYSE:PFE) Zyvox (linezolid).

Rivals or partners?
Both Cubist's Sivextro and Durata's Dalvance are targeted against serious bacterial skin infections caused by Gram-positive infections like MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus). Vancomycin (generic) is now the first-line treatment for MRSA, but it's limited by side effects, toxicity, and is availability in IV form only.

While the two drugs target the same infections, from a macroscopic view, Durata can hardly be considered a true rival. With a vast misbalance in market cap, Durata is but a tiny blip compared to behemoth Cubist, which is already a leader in antibiotics with its blockbuster Cubicin.

Formed just five years ago, Durata is a relatively small biotech formed to buy Pfizer's antibiotic-focused subsidiary Vicuron Pharmaceuticals, an acquisition that resulted in dalbavancin changing hands. Pfizer originally paid $1.9 billion for Vicuron (and dalbavancin) in 2005.

Meanwhile, Cubist has been in full force for development and growth. It acquired Trius Therapeutics and Optimer Pharmaceuticals last summer for $1.6 billion, adding Sivextro to its portfolio in addition to Dificid, Optimer's infectious diarrhea treatment. The company plans to spend $400 million just this year in developing four new agents by 2020. Cubist also plans to file for approval this year an antibacterial agent against complicated urinary and abdominal infections.

Head to head, Durata will have a difficult time against Cubist. But the concurrent approval of their two antibiotics may speak to Durata's value as being a possible future acquisition for Cubist, a deal that analysts have speculated about in the past.

And the drugs themselves?
If both drugs are approved, Durata will severely lag in ability to market its drug compared to Cubist just based on infrastructure and funding, but comparing Dalvance to Sivextro yields a much narrower margin.

Sivextro wins on ease of dosing, offering a once daily pill or injection; meanwhile, Dalvance is given once a week for two weeks. As compared to Pfizer's Zyvox, Sivextro proved noninferiority and also enjoys the advantage of less frequent dosing, shorter course of treatment, and improved side effect profile. Dalvance also proved noninferiority to both vancomycin and vancomycin followed by linezolid, the main compound of Zyvox.

Dalvance specifically generated some concern regarding liver problems and dosing follow-up, but the advisory committees both requested that further safety studies be conducted after the drugs go to market. With both drugs meeting primary endpoints and raising only mild safety concerns, they're pretty comparable, although Dalvance may lag slightly due to the more complicated dosing schedule. Of course, this assumes that the FDA follows these committee recommendations, which is not guaranteed.

The final FDA decision is expected by June 20 for Sivextro and by May 26 for Dalvance.

Bottom line
Pfizer's Zyvox raked in $1.4 billion last year, and Sivextro and Dalvance are estimated to yield $219 million and $449 million by 2019, respectively. But Zyvox's loss of patent protection in 2015 will breed an array of cheap generic competitors, which will in turn also compete with the then newly approved Sivextro and Dalvance.

Cubist is, to my mind, unequivocally the larger, more stable, and safer company. Coupled with its proven success with antibiotics, its aggressive strategy of growth, and its stronger infrastructure for commercialization, Cubist will ultimately reign supreme on this particular fight.

No one expected otherwise, however. What is more notable here is that adding Dalvance to Durata's portfolio -- assuming approval -- would make it a much more attractive purchase, maybe even for Cubist. For the long term, I view Cubist as an excellent potential investment; however, in the short term, Durata is worth watching as it may be courted for purchase if Dalvance is approved.

6 stock picks poised for incredible growth
They said it couldn't be done. But David Gardner has proved them wrong time, and time, and time again with stock returns like 926%, 2,239%, and 4,371%. In fact, just recently one of his favorite stocks became a 100-bagger. And he's ready to do it again. You can uncover his scientific approach to crushing the market and his carefully chosen six picks for ultimate growth instantly, because he's making this premium report free for you today. Click here now for access.

Amy Ho has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Cubist Pharmaceuticals. The Motley Fool owns shares of Cubist Pharmaceuticals. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information