Who's Winning the Battle Between the 2014 Ford Fusion and the Toyota Camry?

Sales of the Accord and Altima fell last month, but the Camry and Fusion both gained ground. Here's why.

Apr 5, 2014 at 10:45AM


Sales of Ford's Fusion were up 9% in March, thanks to some careful discounting. Photo credit: Ford Motor Co.

The first two months of 2014 were rough for new-car sales across the board. 

But last month was apparently a really good time to buy a midsize sedan -- as long as it was a Camry or Fusion.

While Nissan (NASDAQOTH:NSANY) Altima sales were down 5%, and Honda (NYSE:HMC) Accord sales dropped 7%, Toyota (NYSE:TM) said sales of the Camry rose 11%. And Ford (NYSE:F) posted a 9% gain for its Fusion.

What's the story?  

It's not just about incentives
It's easy to think that "incentives" -- those "cash back" or cheap-financing deals we see advertised on TV -- are the story here. But it's a little more complicated than that.

Interestingly, according to Kelley Blue Book estimates, Toyota's incentives on the Camry actually fell in March. KBB says that Toyota spent about $2,650 per Camry in incentives in March, down from about $3,200 in February.

But the Camry's average transaction price also fell slightly from February to March, from $24,335 to $24,169, KBB said. That suggests that Toyota dealers might have been eager to make deals on the Camry for other reasons. 


Toyota wants to see the Camry out-sell its rivals again in 2014. Photo credit: Toyota

Like if Toyota was encouraging them to push the Camry.

That appears to be what happened. Sales of the Camry rose, but sales of Toyota's other cars -- the Yaris, Corolla, Prius, and Avalon -- were all down.

So why would Toyota want to push the Camry? Because Nissan's Altima outsold the Camry in the first two months of 2014, and it's really important to Toyota that the Camry continue its reign as America's best-selling car.

Meanwhile, over in Dearborn, it was about incentives
At the end of February, Ford had a bit of a problem. 

Through the first two months of 2014, sales of its much-admired Fusion were down 14.3%. Severe winter weather in many parts of the U.S. had kept buyers away from new-car dealers, but meanwhile, the two factories that build Fusions had kept humming.

That meant that inventories were rising. Ford needed to sell some cars.

So Ford did what automakers do in that situation: It boosted its incentives -- not hugely, but by about $200 over what it spent in February, KBB estimates, to about $3,050 per Fusion. 

That's high, but it's still about $400 less than Nissan was spending, according to KBB. And the Fusion's average transaction price, pegged by KBB at $26,029, was higher than the Camry's -- and the Altima's, and the Accord's.

As we saw at Toyota, the Fusion's success may have come in part at the cost of sales of other Ford cars. Sales of the Fiesta, Focus, and Taurus were all down in March.

But Ford likely accomplished its goal: It kept pace with Toyota, it sold down some inventory, and it maintained a strong average transaction price (and therefore, good profits on each car sold). 

The upshot: There's a big battle unfolding in this segment
Nissan has been very aggressive with discounts and pricing on its Altima for some time. That has disrupted the usual pecking order in the midsize sedan segment. 

That's a big deal. As a group, midsize sedans are America's biggest-selling cars. 

Keeping the Camry on top of this segment is a big priority for Toyota. Ford probably won't catch the Camry -- it probably can't even make enough Fusions to catch the Camry right now -- but obviously it wants to do as well as possible.

Meanwhile, Honda could well make a move to boost its Accord. 

Long story short: This is going to be a battlefront all year. And if you want a new car, the next few months might be a great time to look at a new Fusion or Camry.

What do you think? Who's going to win this one? Will Ford gain ground on Toyota's Camry like it did last year? Or will Toyota make sure the Camry wins out? Scroll down to leave a comment and let me know. 

OPEC is absolutely terrified of this game-changer
Imagine a company that rents a very specific and valuable piece of machinery for $41,000... per hour (that's almost as much as the average American makes in a year!). And Warren Buffett is so confident in this company's can't-live-without-it business model, he just loaded up on 8.8 million shares. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report reveals the company we're calling OPEC's worst nightmare. Just click HERE to uncover the name of this industry-leading stock... and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable LANDSLIDE of profits!

John Rosevear owns shares of Ford. The Motley Fool recommends Ford. The Motley Fool owns shares of Ford. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information