Why Wall Street Is Turning Against General Motors Company

Did CEO Mary Barra's testimony before Congress expose a deeply flawed GM? Photo credit: General Motors Co.

Shareholders of General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) have been watching the news around the company's recall scandal with some trepidation. 

On the one hand, the stock has been holding up fairly well, with most big investors taking the view that the events would pass in time without doing too much harm to GM's long-term prospects. Toyota's (NYSE: TM  ) experience provides good reason to take that view. 

On the other hand, those of us who have spent many years watching General Motors have been wondering if there's another shoe waiting to drop.

That shoe might have dropped on Wednesday.

A leading GM bull changes his mind
Morgan Stanley auto analyst Adam Jonas is widely perceived as one of the sharper observers of the global auto business. His has been one of the stronger voices making the case for GM as an investment. But that abruptly changed on Wednesday, when Morgan Stanley downgraded GM"s stock to underweight and lowered its price target for GM shares from $49 to $33.

The Detroit News quoted Jonas as saying, "We think the market's got it right on GM valuation and no longer see significant risk-adjusted upside."

Ouch.

That's a sharp change of course for Jonas, who -- like many of his peers -- was quite bullish on GM's prospects as recently as January. 

So, what has changed?

I think that's the problem is that it's starting to look like not enough has changed.

Meet the new GM... a lot like the old GM?
It's no secret that GM was a very broken company before its 2009 bankruptcy. Too much bureaucracy, hilariously inadequate financial controls, broken product-development processes, too-high fixed costs... the list of problems was a very long one.

GM did have some things going for it, even then: Its factories and production processes were modern and well-run, it had a surprising amount of first-rate talent within its engineering ranks, and it had -- somehow -- a steady, if slowly dwindling, group of loyal customers.

The bankruptcy fixed some of that in one fell swoop. Freed of a slew of underutilized factories and heavy debts, GM's cost base was suddenly far more competitive. 

But plenty of problems remained, starting with the still-broken GM bureaucratic culture and its long-misplaced priorities that threatened to sabotage any revival. 

That culture, more than anything else, is what former CEO Dan Akerson set out to fix when he took charge in the fall of 2010. Akerson didn't know the car business when he took over -- but he knew business, and he could see a lot of what GM needed. 

And he had a very good model just a few miles away: Ford's (NYSE: F  ) old problems weren't exactly the same as those that GM was facing, but the Blue Oval's thoroughly convincing turnaround provided a rough road map for addressing GM's lingering issues.

Akerson did a lot of good work. Some things really have changed. GM already has much better internal reporting and financial controls, and it's implementing thoroughly up-to-date systems to improve them still further.  GM's product-development process has been completely overhauled and the results are far better cars and trucks -- and lower costs. 

Strong new GM products like the excellent Chevy Impala sedan have helped convince investors that GM's turnaround is for real. Photo credit: General Motors Co.

But when CEO Mary Barra went before Congress making promises of transparency -- but couldn't answer a lot of questions about the circumstances around the recall -- it gave the impression that GM still has too many layers of dysfunctional bureaucracy. That GM management still doesn't know what's going on in the far-flung reaches of the company. 

That led a lot of people, including your humble Fool, to wonder if GM had really come as far as we'd thought

The case for owning GM stock boils down to the belief that GM is finally getting its act together, that it really is following the path blazed by Ford. There have been a lot of reasons to believe that that's true, that a genuine transformation is well under way. If so, it's easy to argue that GM stock remains a good buy, recall woes notwithstanding. 

But what if GM really hasn't changed all that much?

Apparently, Jonas and his team at Morgan Stanley have been asking themselves the same questions.

It's not too late for Barra to change this, but it's getting late
Barra has spent a lot of time in the last few weeks telling us -- GM customers, Congress, the media, the American public -- how much GM has changed.

Barra has been employed by GM since 1980. I have no doubt she feels GM has changed tremendously over the last few years and that her statements are sincere and heartfelt.

The problem is, she hasn't yet been able to show us that GM has changed and we have decades' worth of reasons to be skeptical. 

We need actions, not words, and we need to see them soon. Without the actions, the words don't mean much. 

It's not too late. Some strong moves from Barra could still change minds.

But when you've got even top-drawer Wall Street analysts hinting that it's the Same Old GM after all, it's getting very late.

GM's stock may be stuck, so here are 6 strong stocks that could do a lot better
They said it couldn't be done. But David Gardner has proved them wrong time, and time, and time again with stock returns like 926%, 2,239%, and 4,371%. In fact, just recently one of his favorite stocks became a 100-bagger. And he's ready to do it again. You can uncover his scientific approach to crushing the market and his carefully chosen six picks for ultimate growth instantly, because he's making this premium report free for you today. Click here now for access.


Read/Post Comments (7) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 10, 2014, at 7:59 PM, DukeMontrose wrote:

    Superb + timely.

    The recall crisis hit GM with a vengeance.

    Events are unfolding with such swiftness, I begin to believe it has come to a point where GM is losing control over its own destiny.

  • Report this Comment On April 11, 2014, at 7:21 AM, EvaBrain wrote:

    Toyota and GM are merging. The new company will be called Recall Motors. You can Read more at http://bit.ly/1q5qs7A

  • Report this Comment On April 11, 2014, at 11:51 AM, tylee100 wrote:

    I suggest you look at yesterday's headlines--two engineers suspended at GM. Old GM would have covered this up and not let anyone know about this.

    They are changing. We just need Mary to not listen to the old guard and lead with her instincts.

    Two years from now GM could be a two or more bagger if Mary can do this.

    New vehicles coming out are wonderful and are getting tops in Powers and other surveys--including safety ratings.

  • Report this Comment On April 11, 2014, at 5:40 PM, xetn wrote:

    "The bankruptcy fixed some of that in one fell swoop. Freed of a slew of underutilized factories and heavy debts, GM's cost base was suddenly far more competitive."

    All at taxpayer expense.

  • Report this Comment On April 11, 2014, at 5:43 PM, TMFMarlowe wrote:

    @tylee100: You wrote:

    "Two years from now GM could be a two or more bagger if Mary can do this."

    I completely agree. For the moment, I'm holding my GM shares.

    But right now, the jury's out on that "if", and that's not good.

    John Rosevear

  • Report this Comment On April 11, 2014, at 6:09 PM, cmalek wrote:

    @Tylee100:

    "New vehicles coming out are wonderful and are getting tops in Powers and other surveys--including safety ratings. "

    Many of the vehicles involved in the recall got tops in Powers in their time. Two, three years from now we'll find out that vehicles produced today should have been recalled but wern't. SSDD

  • Report this Comment On April 12, 2014, at 1:56 AM, DrRobin wrote:

    Wall street turning against GM? I don't know if I'm following closely enough, but is that the image you're holding just because MS is playing office politics, trying to send a message to get their house in order?

    I mean if they sold off a few million or so shares then I'd bee knee deep in that same scenario; but it's give and push and this same "sky is falling" recall hit Nisan what just last year or the year before and you didn't see much ado about that nothing, did you?

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2910593, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/19/2014 2:26:36 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement