How the Chicago Cubs Are Capitalizing on Wrigley Field's 100-Year Anniversary

The Chicago Cubs have been in Wrigley Field for a century, and the team isn't shy about promoting it. Are their marketing efforts good for business?

Apr 11, 2014 at 6:10AM

Although the Chicago Cubs continue to have trouble winning on the diamond, the team can still put fans in the seats. In 2014 thus far, it's 12th in baseball in attendance by capacity, and it finished ninth last year. Part of the reason for its fandom is the Cubs' marketing machine, which remains as strong as ever. So with Wrigley Field turning 100 years old this season, is it any surprise the team is taking advantage?

100 years of Wrigley Field
I attended a game at Wrigley Field this week, and it's clear the stadium has reverence for what came before.



Photos taken by author.

In addition to a collection of historical murals, the team isn't shy about promoting Wrigley's 100th birthday.


Photo taken by author.

It's on every piece of marketing imaginable, from T-Shirts to souvenir cups.


Photo taken by author.

Of course, the team didn't transform Wrigley for fun. It's part of a much broader marketing campaign that includes a website,, merch, and historical food. The park's "Decade Diner," for example, will sell meals based on popular trends in each decade since 1914. And depending on the time of the year, certain hot dog venders will offer "Decade Dogs," such as the "1910's Rueben Dog," the "1930's Cheese Steak Dog," and the "1970's Pulled Pork Dog." Decade-themed drinks are also available.

Will it draw fans to games?
Still, it's too early to tell how these efforts will affect ticket sales. Fansided reports prices are down a little over 5% from 2013, while Team Marketing Report calculates a 0.9% decline. According to the latter, though, a seat at Wrigley Field still costs more than 27 other MLB teams. At an average of $44.16, the Cubs are behind only the Boston Red Sox and the New York Yankees in terms of price.

Screen Shot

Data via Team Marketing Report. Methodology: "Average ticket price represents a weighted average of season ticket prices for general seating categories, determined by factoring the tickets in each price range as a percentage of the total number of seats in each venue." Graph compiled by author.

Among the eight teams above the $30 mark, only the Cubs have experienced four consecutive losing seasons. But ticket sales continue to be in high demand. Tobias Moskowitz and L. Jon Wertheim teamed up to study this phenomenon in their book, Scorecasting, and their findings are nothing short of fascinating. They write (emphasis mine):

Calculating the response of home game attendance to season performance for every MLB team over the past century, we get a measure of how sensitive fans are to team success.... How do the Cubs stack up? It turns out that their attendance is the least sensitive to performance in all of baseball.... If the Dallas Cowboys are America's Team, the Cubs are America's Teflon team.

In other words, the Cubs could stink on the field -- literally or figuratively -- and still draw fans. Moskowitz and Wertheim don't fully explore why this relationship exists, but hint that it may be because "the Cubs play in a picturesque, idyllic old ballpark ... in the gentrified North Side of Chicago." That's not the whole story, they say, though, as the Giants, Orioles, and Red Sox play in similar areas, but have more delicate attendance. My guess? The Cubs might simply have the best -- or most delusional -- fans in baseball.

Regardless of the answer, at least this explains why the team is putting so much marketing power behind Wrigley's 100th birthday. The Cubs may not have an MVP on the field, but they arguably have the most revered park in the MLB. Why not celebrate it?

How do the rest of the Cubs' finances stack up?
According to Forbes, ticket sales only accounted for $117 million of the team's $266 million in revenue last year. TV also makes up a huge piece of the puzzle. It's thought the team makes about $60 million per season from broadcast rights fees.

After its deal with Comcast SportsNet Chicago ends in 2019, Forbes reports Scott Milleisen, a sports banker with JPMorgan Chase, "believes the Cubs are in line for a television rights fee package worth an average of around $200 million a year." The Philadelphia Phillies' new deal pays them a figure near this estimate.

The Cubs also rank well among the rest of Forbes estimates:

Chicago Cubs Ranks, Forbes 2014 Estimates
Value $1,200 million 4th
Revenue $266 million 6th
Operating Income $27 million 8th

Source: Forbes.

Sponsorships with companies like Anheuser Busch Inbev (NYSE:BUD)and PepsiCo (NYSE:PEP) add to the team's top line, and a payroll that's the eighth lowest in baseball keeps costs down.

The bottom line
The team has a clean bill of financial health, and a potentially massive TV deal down the road. While you could argue the Cubs should spend more on players, recent research suggests on-field performance might not matter as much in Wrigleyville as it does in other MLB cities.

And at the end of the day, fans should continue to pay a boatload for seats at Wrigley Field because the ballpark is the Cubs' best attribute. With this season's new "100-Year" marketing campaign, that's even harder to miss.

The greatest thing Warren Buffett ever said
There are now rumors that Warren Buffett, of all investors, might buy part of the Cubs. Regardless of what the billionaire does, though, you can invest like him. Through the years, Buffett has offered up investing tips to shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway. Now you can tap into the best of Warren Buffett's wisdom in a new special report from The Motley Fool. Click here now for a free copy of this invaluable report.

Jake Mann has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends PepsiCo. The Motley Fool owns shares of PepsiCo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information