This Brand New TV Series Will Change Your Mind on Climate Change

Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth documentary sent shockwaves across the global investment community, with ripples still being felt today as more focus than ever is given to climate change in political and corporate circles alike. Now there is a renewed buzz on the subject matter after Superstorm Sandy, the California droughts, and a severe 2014 winter season. That new buzz came from ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  ) reporting to shareholders how it plans to manage climate risk, as well as from a UN IPCC report on climate change which basically said that we can't just talk about climate change, we must fight back now and reverse the effects of man-made produced carbon (a major point in my e-book "Lessons from Frankenstorm.")

To that end, this Sunday, April 13, at 10pm ET/PT, Showtime will be present the first of an 8-10 part series titled "Years of Living Dangerously" which is focused on the human impact of climate change. The series is produced by Academy Award winner James Cameron and features climate scientists, journalists, celebrities, and politicians in a unique view of the biggest story of our time: climate change. 

Rather than talking about climate change from a 10,000-foot view, "Years of Living Dangerously" makes climate change more personal by sharing stories of real people who have been affected by rising temperatures and the realities of climate change. From interview segments featuring those who lost their jobs in Texas because a prolonged drought closed a Cargill meat packing plant to talking with revolution fighters in a Syrian civil war driven by a lack of food from a devastating drought, a new revolution of hungry people has global ramifications we simply can't ignore. This is especially relevant since droughts are now a year-round problem thanks to the growing impact of climate change.

Consider this: Unless we act now to reverse climate change, even Fargo, ND could see temperatures rise to resemble those felt in Phoenix, AZ. That's a sobering thought presented in Episode 1, especially considering how much domestic food is grown in Fargo. Climate change really is a major national security concern that our elected officials such as Governor Perry of Texas must address and act on instead of overlook. 

Episode 1 also makes a strong case that deforestation influences climate change, highlighting Indonesia as a huge culprit in cutting down trees to demand for the palm oil that is more widely used in our food and consumer products such as soap. The Indonesian deforestation releases even more carbon than a coal plant. Did you know that 4% of all global carbon comes from the burning of Indonesian peat? That was another fun fact revealed in Episode 1. 

The documentary series is clearly going to continue its focus on man-made carbon as the real climate change culprit, so what's the solution for mankind? In my view, going carbon neutral doesn't go far enough in addressing climate change. We need to aim higher and push the innovation envelope to discover ways to not just store carbon, but reuse it. That's why I believe the showing of Years of Living Dangerously will help reveal that the real alpha in investing in climate change will actually come from supporting carbon-negative solutions that don't cross the line of geoengineering and cause more planetary harm for future generations to deal with. 

I continue to favor privately held Cool Planet and the implementation of biochar products to give soil enough health to sustain droughts and crop growth. Cool Planet, a company I focused on in a recent Motley Fool video, does have prominent financial backing from the likes of Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL  ) , General Electric (NYSE: GE  ) , Exelon (NYSE: EXC  ) and others.

After seeing Episode 1 of the documentary I'm interested in seeing how substitutes for palm oil, which is used in many consumer products, will emerge. While the series has only begun, there could be much more focus on renewable energy sources like solar and wind power and on energy storage solutions, nuclear power, energy efficiency, and carbon capture and storage (CCS.)

The documentary seems to be leading the viewer to assume climate change will cause a population shift away from rural to city living, so smart grid solutions from utilities will likely play a more pivotal role in the future of energy as a more sustainable planet adopts new strategies to reverse climate change. That means that there are new strategic opportunities in energy efficiency and distributed power for companies like NRG Energy (NYSE: NRG  ) , as well as those looking to find solutions by tapping more software (cleanweb) ways to help fight climate change in a new Cleantech 2.0 world. 

There is no question that vast amounts of snow and ice have diminished and the rising sea level that results can wreak calamities of epic proportion. At the end of the day, Years of Living Dangerously tries to make climate change more easily understood since many people are still under the assumption that this is a cyclical weather pattern.

By the end of Episode 1, I do hope that more people who think that man's actions aren't responsible for climate change will begin to change their minds. I'm certainly looking forward to upcoming episodes of this must-watch series.

Are you ready to profit from this $14.4 trillion revolution?
Let's face it, every investor wants to get in on revolutionary ideas before they hit it big. Like buying PC-maker Dell in the late 1980s, before the consumer computing boom. Or purchasing stock in e-commerce pioneer Amazon.com in the late 1990s, when it was nothing more than an upstart online bookstore. The problem is, most investors don't understand the key to investing in hyper-growth markets. The real trick is to find a small-cap "pure-play" and then watch as it grows in EXPLOSIVE lockstep with its industry. Our expert team of equity analysts has identified one stock that's poised to produce rocket-ship returns with the next $14.4 TRILLION industry. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening report.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 13, 2014, at 3:06 PM, DevonShire123 wrote:

    If you believe your TV, you're f***ing retarded.

  • Report this Comment On April 13, 2014, at 3:37 PM, weyorel wrote:

    I am 80 years old, experienced the 1938 hurricane in New Hampshire and numerous ones since; in the 1950s I was stationed in Lake Charles, La and experienced one there as well as traveled along the Texas Gulf shore and learned of the ravages of numerous storms over the past 200 plus years; I have lived for fifteen years in West Texas and New Mexico and seen drought; I have read history of the 1930s dust bowl, the disaster during those years in the Ukraine - I am aware of various historic and millennial climatic changes as well as the large amounts of snow we had in New England in 2013-2014 winter. Emotional pandering from the likes of Al Gore and the left wing Hollywood Crowd and the United Nations parasites are not facts or science. Photos of depression era tragic events or present ones are not proof of man made climate change. The fool ought to be ashamed of publishing an emotional propaganda scare piece like this article.

  • Report this Comment On April 13, 2014, at 3:44 PM, toomuchgas wrote:

    Why is Motley Fool trying to shove climate change down our throats? I thought it was supposed to be about investments. Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth was filled with predictions that have already failed to come true and a lot of predictions that will never come true. Unless Russia, China, and India suddenly become believers there is nothing we can do except beat up on our energy companies to the detriment of our country.

  • Report this Comment On April 13, 2014, at 11:34 PM, gypsystem wrote:

    I believe human activity is causing climate change. But even if you don’t believe proof exists to support that theory, why would we not pursue alternative sources of energy just in case?

    Consider a smoker making an argument like this in the days before it was accepted fact that smoking causes cancer:

    “There is absolutely no proof that smoking cigarettes can cause premature death. People have been dying for thousands of years, long before the commercial production of cigarettes. Warning labels and anti-smoking ads are just scare tactics used by do-gooder parasites in an effort to spoil other peoples’ fun. Why, just the other day I read an article by a doctor, a real MD, and he said smoking is perfectly safe. And he ought to know; he works for Phillip Morris.”

    What I really don’t understand is why some people are so vehemently opposed to any idea or activity that may be beneficial to the environment, no matter what it is.

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2014, at 12:12 AM, predfern wrote:

    Global warming theory has been falsified. The temperature has been flat for 17 years. In addition, global warming theory claimed that there is a hot spot in the upper troposphere of the tropics but accurate balloon and satellite data did not find it. Every scientific theory must be falsifiable. The NIPCC report presents thousands of peer reviewed scientific papers that contradict the global warming claims. Solar cycles are getting weaker and we are heading into another little ice age.

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2014, at 2:41 AM, kafantaris wrote:

    The government can’t change the weather,

    but it can help us prepare for bad weather when it comes. That’s the point. Yet climate change deniers would rather leave us at risk than lift a finger towards caution — less it be deemed an admission that climate change is in fact taking place.

    Though we may never agree on what causes climate change, we should agree we need to get ready for it.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2912189, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2014 10:09:34 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement