AMD Bests NVIDIA With the Radeon 295X2

Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD  ) has been losing discrete GPU market share to rival NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA  ) for the past few years. With NVIDIA continually beating AMD in the high end of the market, the former has been able to claim a roughly 65% share of discrete GPU sales.

AMD's recent announcement of a new high-end GPU offering, the Radeon 295X2, accomplishes something that AMD has been unable to do in quite some time. NVIDIA has no products that compete with the new card on price or performance, leaving AMD with a small, but very profitable corner of the high-end market. This is certainly a win for AMD -- one that it desperately needs -- but it will take a lot more than a single high-end product to wrestle significant market share away from NVIDIA.

Source: AMD

Going all out for the high end
The Radeon 295X2 is a monster of a GPU. Set to go on sale soon, the $1,500 card crams two of the company's 290X GPUs into a single product, drawing a staggering 500 watts of power, under load. The 295X2 comes equipped with a built-in liquid cooling system -- the only way that much heat could be effectively dissipated. Given the specs, it's clear that this GPU is aimed at the highest of the high-end PC gaming market.

The 295X2 is aimed at those looking to play PC games at a 4K resolution, a very small segment of the PC gaming market. According to Steam, only about 1.6% of Steam users use a resolution higher than 1920x1200, roughly a quarter of the number of pixels in a 4K display. This isn't surprising, given the price of 4K monitors is often in the thousands of dollars, and this percentage will remain low until those prices come down.

But however small the number of those playing at 4K resolutions is, the 295X2 is essentially the only game in town. Playing modern games at high settings at a 4K resolution requires a tremendous amount of graphics processing power, and while some other GPUs produce playable frame rates in some cases, the 295X2 is the only one capable of getting close to 60 fps. For those shelling out more than $1,000 on a 4K display already, the choice is clearly the 295X2.

A gap in NVIDIA's product portfolio
At a more common resolution, like 1080p, the 295X2 is complete overkill, and any high-end single-GPU card provides acceptable performance. But 4K gaming represents a gap in NVIDIA's line of GPUs, and that gives AMD a big advantage until NVIDIA releases a viable competitor.

NVIDIA has already announced a dual-GPU card of its own, the GTX Titan Z. But with a planned price of $3,000 and performance that may not even match the 295X2, it's really not a competitor. The Titan Z is aimed more at computing users, offering a budget version of NVIDIA's Tesla line of GPUs meant for scientific simulations and the like; it's not a very compelling choice for gamers unless the planned price comes way down.

At a lower price of $1,100 is NVIDIA's Titan Black, but this can't keep up with the 295X2 at 4K resolutions. NVIDIA offers nothing in between, other than a multiple-GPU setup, and this essentially hands the 4K gaming market to AMD for the time being.

Winning the battle, losing the war
While the 295X2 is an important victory for AMD, NVIDIA still offers the best price per performance at most other high-end price points. According to Tom's Hardware, which does a monthly review of gaming GPUs, NVIDIA's products are currently superior at every price point above $200, with a sole AMD GPU able to tie at the $500 price level. So while the 295X2 will be in a league of its own once it's released, that league is very small compared to the portion of the market that NVIDIA dominates.

The bottom line
While the 295X2 shows that AMD can compete at the high end, it doesn't change the overall picture very much. NVIDIA became the market leader because it offered the best performance per dollar at a large range of prices, and it continues to do that. The market for 4K gaming is still in its infancy, and while AMD currently has the upper hand, there's no guarantee that it will last.

4K gaming is great, but what's the next big thing?
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now... for just a fraction of the price of AAPL stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.


Read/Post Comments (8) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 15, 2014, at 10:54 AM, rav55 wrote:

    This years high end is next years mid range.

  • Report this Comment On April 15, 2014, at 11:17 AM, nonbiasfool wrote:

    if you were to take all the data and twist it to the most pro-AMD position possible, you would have this article..

  • Report this Comment On April 15, 2014, at 11:51 AM, TEBuddy wrote:

    nonbiasfool, you sound like a biased fool. Because this article is clearly not pro-AMD, as it foolishly states nVidia has a lead in price per performance on all other high end video cards. That is simply not true, only how biased fools portray things because they are getting kickbacks from nVidia.

    Not even a biased fool can dispute the 295X2 is more powerful that anything nVidia has.

  • Report this Comment On April 15, 2014, at 12:09 PM, H2323 wrote:

    AMD clearly has the price to performance advantage on cards that crytominers don't use.

  • Report this Comment On April 16, 2014, at 2:41 AM, tely1 wrote:
  • Report this Comment On April 16, 2014, at 9:51 AM, ChiTownTx wrote:

    AMD can keep pumping out the next biggest card all they want. Being a gamer I can tell you the main reason AMD can't pull ahead of Nvidia is their driver support. Most high end gamers love their cards. In many cases they are faster, run cooler and are cheaper too. However if you have to go into the drivers and tweak things to get it to be compatible with the games you play or jump through other hoops it's just not worth it.

    They need to quit trying to one up Nvidia and do something about the software support for the products they have out now.

  • Report this Comment On April 16, 2014, at 9:11 PM, funbuddy wrote:

    Is there any 4k video games on the market? and how much profit will gain for that in all AMD profile?

  • Report this Comment On April 16, 2014, at 11:53 PM, Beerfloat wrote:

    CrossFire (and SLI) are very poor ways to scale performance. Cards like these are basically inefficient hacks and only users who are not interested in technology would claim that this is a meaningful performance crown.

    And sadly AMD's CrossFire software support makes for an even less pleasant experience than its regular suboptimal environment.

    Lastly, Nvidia could easily build a better dual GPU card with Kepler or Maxwell but there isn't any reason to make this a priority.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2914984, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/29/2014 11:46:20 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement