Here’s Why Apple Should Raise the iPhone 6 Price

Apple may raise the price of its next iPhone, but it doesn't have to be bad news for investors or consumers.

Apr 15, 2014 at 11:30AM

The 16GB iPhone 5s costs $199 with a contract or $650 unsubsidized. Source: Apple

This week Peter Misek, an analyst at Jefferies & Co., wrote in an investor note that Apple's (NASDAQ:AAPL) would increase the price of the so-called iPhone 6 because this year will be relatively quiet for new high-end smartphone releases.

Apple's iPhone is already a premium device that costs a lot of money. But no, the company hasn't lost its mind if it does indeed end up charging more for the iPhone 6. Before we write off Apple as an insanely greedy company (for one, there's no confirmation the company will indeed raise the price), let's talk a little about why this idea makes sense.

The best option right now
Here's what Misek, wrote in his investor note about a possibly higher-priced iPhone 6:

The possibility may at first seem farfetched in light of investor concerns regarding possible carrier subsidy and handset price cuts due to smartphone saturation and lack of differentiation. But we think this general lack of differentiation could be the reason why Apple may be able to get a price increase. Carriers realize that the iPhone 6 will likely be the only headline-worthy high-end phone launched this year and that they will lose subs if they do not offer it [...].

He thinks that Apple's new iPhone 6 will be the only noteworthy device this year, which will entice consumers and make it easier for Apple to raise the price -- even if carriers aren't keen on the idea.

That's a plausible reason. But there's also another explanation for a price increase -- the iPhone 6 display will likely be bigger than its predecessor's.


The iPhone 5s display costs $41 alone. Source: Apple

Screens aren't cheap
The Wall Street Journal reported in January that Apple wants to launch two new iPhones, one with a screen bigger than 4.5-inches and the other bigger than 5 inches. That comes after Bloomberg said in November Apple is working on 4.7-inch and 5.5-inch iPhones.

If Apple ups the inches on its next iPhone, it's going to increase the iPhone's bill of materials (BOM). In the past, the cost of the iPhone's new tech has mostly been offset by falling prices of other materials or improvements to efficiency, which evens out of the total BOM and keeps the cost relatively stable.

For example, the BOM of the iPhone 4 was about $188, compared to the BOM cost of the much more powerful and larger iPhone 5 at $199. When Apple introduced the 5s with a 64-bit A7 processor, better camera, M7 motion sensor chip, and Touch ID, the BOM still remained at $199.

One of the biggest bill of materials expenses comes from the phone's display. The iPhone 5s' display costs $41 out of the total $199 BOM.

Apple likes to keep its profit margins high on the iPhone, so if it makes a major jump from a 4-inch screen to two bigger sizes, then it will obviously want to recoup those costs.


An increase in screen size may result in an iPhone price hike. Source: Apple

Who pays for a bigger screen
Instead of Apple eating the entire cost of a bigger iPhone, and lowering its margins, it could pass the cost on to carriers, which eventually (most likely) get passed on to consumers.

But it doesn't have to be bad news. If Apple does indeed launch two new phones, it could keep the 4.7-inch device the same cost as the current iPhone 5s, which would be similar to the company's strategy when it jumped screen sizes from a 3.5-inch iPhone 4s to the 5-inch iPhone. The 16GB iPhone 5 had the subsidized price of $199 when it launched, the same cost as the its smaller-screen 16GB 4S predecessor.

But, to make up for the huge leap in screen size to a possibly 5.5-inch screen, Apple could raise the larger iPhone price anywhere from $50 to $100, as Misek suggested, in order to keep the iPhone's profit margin intact. 

Foolish final thoughts
If Apple releases two new screen sizes for the new iPhone 6, I think the company will keep the same price for the smaller device as the current iPhone 5s, while raising the price for the biggest screen iPhone. Doing so would both keep to Apple's previous pricing structure -- which would make consumers happy -- and also keep profit margins relatively unchanged, which should make investors happy.

Misek estimated that a $50 price increase -- assuming no change in units sold -- would increase revenue by 2% and earnings per share by 11%. If the iPhone price went up by $100, the change would be a 6% revenue increase and a 24% EPS jump.

Either way, investors would definitely welcome those numbers. Unfortunately, besides the WSJ and Bloomberg reports, it's still up in the air whether Apple will definitely release a larger iPhone 6. But it's clear that if the company did so, can satisfy both consumers and investors.

Small screens will be bigger than ever
While Apple may be increasing the display size of its next iPhone, there's a small screen trend that's growing fast, and could one day outpace mobile. Wearable technology has the opportunity to dominate the tech sector, and Google, Samsung and Intel already know how big this could be. While Apple hasn't entered the wearables market yet, investors don't have to sit around waiting. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.

Fool contributor Chris Neiger has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple, Google (A shares), Google (C shares), and Intel. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Google (A shares), Google (C shares), and Intel. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information