"Like" General Mills, Give Up Your Right to Sue

Can Facebook please add a "Dislike" button to its interface? Or just put one on the pages of Cheerios and Betty Crocker?

Interacting with consumers across social media has become an established business practice for companies seeking to develop a rapport, establish social capital, and ultimately grow sales, but for General Mills (NYSE: GIS  ) , that interaction constitutes a legal relationship -- if you "Like" its products, you'll forever give up the right to sue the company, even if it's because of its own negligence.

According to The New York Times, the cereal maker updated the legal terms listed on its privacy policy page earlier this month, and did so with little fanfare. When reporters tried contacting General Mills about the changes, the company ducked the questions by refusing to make anyone available. Instead, it further expanded its legal liability protection by saying even the act of buying its products means you waive all your rights to sue.

Whatever goodwill the cereal maker created last year with its push to become recognized as a more inclusive company has undoubtedly just been thrown into the shredder.

As the Times reports, whether it's visiting the company's website, downloading a coupon, entering a sweepstakes, subscribing to a newsletter, or yes, buying some Betty Crocker cake mix, you're effectively agreeing to waive all your rights to sue by simply engaging with the company. Legal experts, though, have a hard time imagining the courts would go along with such a scheme, particularly if it can be shown consumers weren't consciously aware they were giving up their rights.

Moreover, when you engage in these activities with General Mills, it's turning around and selling your personal data to third parties who can then inundate you with advertising. So the cereal maker makes money off your information and then protects its profits with a dubious legal out. 

Now there is a way to protect your legal rights by opting out of the scheme in writing, but then you must also stop engaging with the company, which presumably means not buying its products too. That just seems like such a boneheaded way to grow sales. The Times goes on to note that the company recently and unsuccessfully tried to have a suit against it dismissed, for claiming its products were "natural" when they actually contained unnatural ingredients, so it's probably trying to limit its litigation costs -- but the phrase "penny-wise and pound-foolish" comes to mind.

It's should be noted that General Mills doesn't have a Facebook page of its own; the one that appears is automatically generated content created by Facebook. Indeed, General Mills' own website doesn't include a Facebook icon either, but does have one for Twitter, YouTube, and LinkedIn. What the cereal maker does have are pages for its various products. The verified Cheerios page, for example, has over 1 million likes (sorry, folks, you've given up your right to sue). Betty Crocker has almost 2.9 million likes (yeah, you people are out of luck, too).

There is a backlash growing against the cereal maker for its shenanigans as Facebook users begin informing the company they're opting out of the agreement -- and won't buy a General Mills product again. How much the ill will it's generated will cost the company is incalculable at the moment, but however much it costs, it's not going to be a tally they're going to like.

A stock that doesn't assault your sense of decency
There's a huge difference between a good stock and a stock that can make you rich. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it's one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 17, 2014, at 4:38 PM, pondee619 wrote:

    Why would I want to give a company an unsolicited, uncompensated endorsement of its product by "likeing" same?

    I am confused by a country where people cling to and proclaim their right to privacy and then freely give their endorsement to a consumer product. Does the giver of a "like" get something in return, other than feeling that their opinion is worth something? Is this a self esteem issue?

    Would these same "likers" stand on the street corner, stand in the mall, stand up in class, take to the soap box and proclaim "I like Cheerios"? Why?

    Of course, it only takes a Judge to rule that this is proper, legal and enforceable.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2919954, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/22/2014 2:38:46 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement