Why Warner Brothers Was Right to Take a Risk on Wally Pfister and ‘Transcendence’

Warner Brothers' new movie ‘Transcendence’ may not be a big domestic hit, but it has other factors in play that could make it smart decision by the studio.

Apr 19, 2014 at 5:50PM

Usually when a studio like Warner Brothers (a subsidiary of Time Warner (NYSE:TWX)) invests $100 million in a movie, executives expect a lot in return. With this weekend's Transcendence, that is certainly the assumption, but even if the movie under-delivers (which many project it will), this was still a smart risk for its studio to take as the long-term benefits may outdo the short-run returns.



(Credit: Warner Brothers)

The film industry only works when directors are allowed to take risks. Many of history's most ground-breaking movies have been born out of risk and transcended current cinema as a result. Citizen Kane and Psycho are among the most famous, but then you have more recent films like The Matrix and Inception, which haven't been around as long, but still have made a unique mark.

The directors behind those films may be minted "A-listers" now, but that wasn't always the case. It took time for studios to trust their visions. Clearly after his work on Inception and The Dark Knight trilogy, nobody will ever doubt Christopher Nolan's' "vision" again. The Oscar nominee is a genius filmmaker with an eye for detail and imagination rarely seen in today's Hollywood.

Unlike his contemporaries, Nolan doesn't use what's called a "second unit," a separate group of shooters used to help support hard-to-shoot scenes. Instead it is just him and Wally Pfister, his longtime cinematographer. After winning an Academy Award for Inception, Pfister knew he had reached the level he wanted to as a director of photography and decided he wanted a new challenge.



(Wally Pfister & Christopher Nolan-Credit: Warner Brothers)

Pfister was a news cameraman who eventually landed a job on Nolan's first film, Memento, a mind-bending thriller that still packs a punch. After the film, he teamed with Nolan on many more projects and undoubtedly began to learn a few tricks along the way. It was a wonderful partnership that produced a number of amazing movies.

So why switch things up now? In a fascinating interview with The Daily Beast, Pfister explained that in making his directorial debut with Transcendence, it was just his way of pushing himself to the next level.

Every 10 years I needed to make a radical change in what I was doing. I can't really say why. But I will say that I was never afraid to take risks.

It was also Warner Brothers' way of pushing its slate to the next level as the idea of having Pfister in the fold meant it would have a budding relationship with what could turn out to be a rising star. Given that the studio's relationship with Nolan was not as solid as before, signing his frequent collaborator could also be a way around that somewhat sticky situation. If audiences loved Nolan, theoretically they should also love Pfister as the two have the same passion for filmmaking.


That brings us to Transcendence, which stars Johnny Depp as a scientist studying Artificial Intelligence who inadvertently becomes a part of his research when he's gravely injured and his mind is uploaded to a computer.

On paper the thriller has a lot of interesting moving pieces including an intriguing plot, an A-list cast headlined by Depp and Morgan Freeman, and a director full of promise attached. Yes it cost Warner Brothers $100 million to produce, but the payoff could potentially be huge. Now the key word is "potentially" as estimates had Transcendence earning $30 million during its domestic opening weekend, but that has since tapered off to between $20 million and $25 million.

It could be a combination of people not fully understanding the plot of the film or moviegoers not knowing about the Nolan/Pfister connection, but either way the critical pounding the movie took this week didn't helping matters. Still it pays to remember Memento (while better received) wasn't a big financial hit either, so you can't judge a box office career on one movie.


The twist that people keep forgetting in this case is that even if Transcendence disappoints domestically, it could be a financial boon overseas. So far the international crowd has bailed out a number of films this year alone and given Depp has a big global fan base the movie was coming with a nice safety net.

Yet that's not all -- Transcendence has another benefit many aren't aware of; it was not just being given a day and date release in China, it was being given a 3D release there as well.

Movie piracy takes a big bite into overseas profits especially if a film starts long after it bows here in the States. With bootlegging running rampant (especially in China) the studios needed a way to combat it and 3D is looking like the answer. While American audiences have grown tired of the third dimension, international audiences can't get enough of it. By releasing Transcendence in 3D (and IMAX) more people will come to the theaters.


(Credit: Warner Brothers)

Sony already tried this approach earlier this year with its RoboCop reboot and saw good results, which is encouraging to the industry as a whole. The trend is also beneficial to Warner Brothers as Beijing-based DMG Entertainment was the one footing the bill for the costly post-conversion process. DMG's no stranger to capitalizing on the 3D appeal in China -- it helped bring last summer's hit Iron Man 3 to the country before it unspooled in the US, which led to a massive haul.

If this trend continues it could open a whole new door financially for studios and possibly move international markets into first position for film openings. With all that in mind, it should be a little clearer why this wasn't as big of a risk to Warner Brothers as first thought. In addition to creating a relationship with someone who has the potential to be a major player down the line, the studio also gets to experiment with what could be a global game changer.

In an industry worth billions, all of a sudden $100 million doesn't seem like a bad gamble.

Are you ready to profit from this $14.4 trillion revolution?
Let's face it, every investor wants to get in on revolutionary ideas before they hit it big. Like buying PC-maker Dell in the late 1980s, before the consumer computing boom. Or purchasing stock in e-commerce pioneer Amazon.com in the late 1990s, when it was nothing more than an upstart online bookstore. The problem is, most investors don't understand the key to investing in hyper-growth markets. The real trick is to find a small-cap "pure-play" and then watch as it grows in EXPLOSIVE lockstep with its industry. Our expert team of equity analysts has identified one stock that's poised to produce rocket-ship returns with the next $14.4 TRILLION industry. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening report.

Brett Gold has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information