1 Hidden Advantage Chipotle Has Over McDonald's

If it wasn't already clear to investors that Chipotle Mexican Grill  (NYSE: CMG  ) and McDonald's  (NYSE: MCD  ) are moving in vastly different directions, then their first-quarter earnings reports should have hammered the point home. Same-store sales jumped 13.4% at Chipotle, but fell 1.7% at McDonald's U.S. locations. 

McDonald's is struggling with rising commodity costs, a need to modernize its brand, and competition from all angles. Chipotle, meanwhile, is breezing past the competition, so confident in its customer loyalty even after a "bad winter" that it's raising prices. There are plenty of other differences between the two food purveyors, of course, but one that's often been ignored is how a minimum wage increase would affect the two brands. 

One of many protests against McDonald's for higher pay. Source: Wikipedia.

Trying to make a dollar out of 15 cents
In the fight for a higher minimum wage, chains like McDonald's have been at the center of the spotlight, while Chipotle seems to be getting a pass. Restaurant workers and union organizers have protested outside many Golden Arches locations, with workers in New York demanding a raise to $15 an hour and others recently filing a class action suit, accusing McDonald's of wage theft. Chipotle has not been completely ignored by protesters, but the company is often lauded for paying workers more than minimum wage and for the upward mobility it provides, as crew members often rise through the ranks to well-paying management jobs.  

A recent study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, based on data from California, Illinois, and New Jersey, showed one effect of raising the minimum wage was that it forced underpaying fast-food chains to close, but those locations were often replaced by restaurants like Chipotle that are already paying above minimum wage.    

While McDonald's resists calls to pay its workers more, Chipotle insists it would have no problem absorbing a minimum wage increase, as average wages are already at $9 an hour. Co-CEO Monty Moran said the effects of raising the minimum wage to $10 per hour would not be "too significant," and on last week's earnings call, CFO Jack Hartung said California's plan to lift base wages to $10 an hour in 2016 would only cost the company a few million dollars. Considering the effects that the hike would have on competitors like McDonald's, an increased minimum wage would probably favor Chipotle, as it would put more pressure on its rivals. 

Since most of McDonald's locations are franchised, the decision to raise wages ultimately falls into the hands of franchisees and not in those of corporate executives who take the blame for low pay, which may explain the rub. While McDonald's as a company has higher profit margins than Chipotle, that difference comes from the business model -- franchising yields higher margins than operating stores -- but franchisees generally have even lower margins than corporate-owned stores as they have to pay royalties and advertising costs back to headquarters in addition to the usual expenses of running a restaurant. Last year, Arcos Dorados, the largest McDonald's franchisee in the world and Latin America's biggest fast-food chain, had a profit margin of just 1.3%. Arcos Dorados operates outside the U.S., but the numbers are still representative. A margin that thin would easily disappear in an industry where labor costs generally register above 20%.

Smiles are still free
The refusal to franchise also gives Chipotle more control over its brand image, whereas McDonald's has little influence over franchisees when it comes to pocketbook issues that are damaging its image. Like Chipotle, Starbucks has a reputation for paying its workers well and does not franchise. McDonald's burger-slinging brethren, meanwhile, employ the same franchise model, and have also been the target of wage protests. 

Ultimately, the minimum wage issue may just be one small component of the battle for America's fast-food dollar, and many other factors separate the burrito roller from the home of the Big Mac. But at a time when Chipotle's comps are growing by double digits and McDonald's are falling at home, Mickey D's can ill afford to fall further behind. Any wage increase is just going to bring more headaches to McDonald's, and is likely to drive even more customers into Chipotle's arms.

Guess who was one of the first on the Chipotle bandwagon 
It was Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner. David has a knack for finding growth stocks, digging up returns like 926%, 2,239%, and 4,371%. In fact, just recently one of his favorite stocks became a 100-bagger, and he's ready to do it again. You can uncover his scientific approach to crushing the market and his carefully chosen six picks for ultimate growth instantly, because he's making this premium report free for you today. Click here now for access.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 24, 2014, at 3:03 AM, RMengineer wrote:

    But it also seems that they are chasing different target markets. People that spend $8-$9 on a burrito are probably not the same people as people that spend a buck or two on the _lowest priced_ possible burger.

    People that spend $8-$9 bucks are also probably less sensitive to price fluctuations than are people who are spending a buck or two at McD's because that's all they can afford. So in that sense I dispute to an extent the claim that McD's raising prices would chase them to Chipotle. To the extent that they go to McD's because of price, well, if they leave McD's due to higher prices, it sure won't be to go to Chipotle. But on the other hand, as other actual competitors to McD's are in the same minimum wage boat, where exactly would those people go instead if they where to stop going to McD's on account of higher price?

  • Report this Comment On April 24, 2014, at 4:21 PM, TheeMadCatte wrote:

    It seems like the answer is to stop franchising. The chains' (corporate-owned, non-franchised) managers and district managers probably make more money than a franchisee would make if it were franchised.

    How does McDonald's compare to other low price chains that don't franchise, such as White Castle?

    It is also worth mentioning that Starbucks regular coffee (which doesn't franchise) is actually cheaper than Dunkin Donuts (which is franchised). The prices are the same if not similar, but Starbucks gives you 12 oz in their tall (small), as opposed to Dunkin Donuts 10 oz small coffee. $1.65 for Dunkin, $1.75 for Starbucks.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2925306, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/19/2014 10:15:59 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement