Apple, Inc.'s iPhone Business Won't Be Devastated by the End of Subsidies

The end of smartphone subsidies poses a threat to Apple's (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) iPhone business, according to an article published by The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday. Major U.S. wireless carriers are quickly moving their subscribers to non-subsidized plans, threatening Apple's core business in the process.

By just about any measure, Apple's flagship iPhone 5s is expensive. Google's (NASDAQ: GOOG  ) Nexus 5, despite offering a larger screen and comparable hardware, retails for only about half as much. In the past, carriers had borne the burden, paying for their subscribers' handsets -- in the process, obscuring the relative costs of various models.

If subsidies go away, consumers could opt for cheaper phones -- like the Nexus 5 -- in place of more expensive ones from Apple. A recent survey, however, suggests that won't be the case.

The end of subsidies
The Wall Street Journal's argument is hardly new -- in fact, since last November, I had been warning that the loss of subsidies could disrupt Apple's business. At the time, the argument appeared convincing -- if consumers were rational, they'd buy a cheaper, "good enough" device in place of a more expensive handset from Apple.

If a consumer, opting for one of the new, unsubsidized plans, purchased a Nexus 5 up front (rather than an iPhone 5s), they could save themselves a great deal of money, cutting the cost of his monthly wireless bill by as much as 50%. In contrast, under the old, subsidized model, the cost savings would be minimal -- Google's phone would have little advantage over Apple's flagship.

Consumers choose more expensive phones
But the data doesn't support such notions. According to a recent survey by Consumer Intelligence Research Partners, smartphone buyers on unsubsidized plans actually choose more costly rather than less expensive handsets. How can this be? Shouldn't they be looking to save money? Perhaps the best explanation is one that considers cash flow.

Plans that use subsidies often require up-front payments of several hundred dollars -- getting Apple's flagship on a subsidized plan usually entails coughing up $199 at the time of purchase. In contrast, unsubsidized plans often (though not always) allow subscribers to get the same phones for no money down -- instead, the cost is spread out over monthly installments.

Purchasing a more expensive phone results in higher monthly payments, which makes it a less than prudent financial decision. But given that some three-quarters of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck and about a quarter of the country has no savings whatsoever, any plan that gets rid of large, up-front payments is obviously appealing. In that context, Google's cheaper phone (which requires a one-time payment of $350) is less affordable.

The risks to Apple remain
Of course, the trend away from subsidies is not without its risks: Under a subsidized plan, the monthly cost stays the same even after the two-year contract expires. This makes regular, biennial smartphone upgrades the norm -- your bill isn't dropping anyway, so why not upgrade your phone?

In contrast, unsubsidized plans become less costly after the handset itself is paid off -- getting a new phone requires a conscious decision to raise one's monthly bill, perhaps by a substantial amount. As unsubsidized plans become the norm, investors in Apple should be prepared for longer upgrade cycles, though, to be fair, that too is unclear. Unsubsidized plans allow subscribers to trade in their handsets after a year or less -- extending their monthly payments but allowing them to get the latest and greatest phone.

Overall, while there are risks, it doesn't appear that the move away from subsidies will devastate Apple's iPhone business.

Apple's next legendary product
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now... for just a fraction of the price of AAPL stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 23, 2014, at 9:52 AM, ft55555 wrote:

    Horrible analysis. How can a $350 Nexus be MORE expensive than a $650 iPhone? Whatever monthly installment plan available to the iPhone is available to the Nexus as well.

  • Report this Comment On April 23, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Cintos wrote:

    Buying an Apple phone is a better long term investment. Apple phone users know they can get a premium when selling their unit after buying a new one. And yes, LG Electronics' Nexus 5 is only $349 with no contract, the more highly promoted Samsung Galaxy S5 costs $660 - comparable to the iPhone 5S.

  • Report this Comment On April 23, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Renee wrote:

    Nexus 5 is free with 2 year contract, iPhone 5S is $100 with 2 year contract.

    The only good reason to buy an iPhone is if you care about its resale value. So if you are in it for the investment, then yes, people buy used iPhones like crazy (as the old ones aren't that much different from the new ones in terms of what they can do, thanks to Apple artificially limiting things).

    If, on the other hand, you are in it for the best phone, then (for the past 3 years), iPhone is not the way to go, as there are a lot of better phones for the same money (and even often cheaper).

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2925304, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/16/2014 11:37:52 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement