How Much Does Qualcomm Charge for a Snapdragon?

In this article, the average selling price per smartphone platform from Qualcomm is explored.

Apr 23, 2014 at 2:00PM

If you went to try to purchase a smartphone chip without being an OEM or buying in bulk, you might have a pretty hard time. While it may not be so easy to find out how much a given system-on-chip or a modem may cost, we can get a general sense of how much Qualcomm (NASDAQ:QCOM) -- the leading system-on-chip vendor -- gets per chip from the numbers the company gives at its quarterly earnings reports.

Let's look at last year
In Fiscal 2013, Qualcomm shipped 716 million MSM chips. According to Qualcomm's most recent form 10-K, MSM shipments comprise discrete modems, as well as integrated apps processor with cellular and connectivity. It is unclear, however, if these shipments include things such as RF360, discrete connectivity combos, power management IC, and so on. However, since Qualcomm typically sells the entire platform with its MSMs, we can get a pretty decent estimate of the total silicon content per phone powered by a Qualcomm chip.

Total equipment and services revenue came in at $16.49 billion, so a straightforward -- although probably not perfectly accurate -- estimate of the average selling price per platform shipped on Qualcomm's end is about $24. Do note, however, that in the future, Qualcomm is likely to see a mix-up per platform as it gains content share, particularly in connectivity, offset by perhaps stronger growth in the lower end than in the higher end.

Trying to get a handle on cost structure and market size
We know that Qualcomm gets about $24 per platform, with the majority of that either dominated by the modem or the integrated apps processor; but the next question worth asking is how much it costs Qualcomm to build/ship these things. Well, the cost of revenue for QCT during 2013 was $9.82 billion, implying an average cost per platform of $13.72. Note that this includes shipping costs, packaging and test, and so on.

As a quick head-check on how accurate these numbers are, an average selling price per smartphone platform for Qualcomm -- (again, the majority of it dominated by either the discrete modem or the integrated apps processor, most Qualcomm customers use the integrated processor) -- of $24 suggests a rough smartphone and tablet apps processor market of $29 billion, assuming 1 billion smartphone units, 200 million tablet units. This overstates the TAM, as Qualcomm almost exclusively owns the non-Apple high-end apps processor market (higher mix), and these numbers include non-apps processor parts.

Is there room for competition?
At an average platform price of about $24, and with Qualcomm's relatively rich mix, there is probably room for disruption from one or two higher-end players. Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) spends at roughly the same level of Qualcomm and – assuming it can get its execution in order – should be the prime vendor to take share.

MediaTek has done an excellent job at the low end of the market, and has gained pretty significant share in the China 3G/TD-SCDMA market. The company does have ambitions of attacking other markets -- such as the U.S. -- and has some pretty solid momentum; but its dramatically lower R&D spending and apparent laggard status in cellular basebands (Qualcomm and Intel will be shipping cat. 6 LTE-Advanced this quarter; MediaTek is just now shipping cat. 4 LTE), could prove a longer-term headwind despite the shorter-term robust financial performance. At any rate, Qualcomm's $3.7 billion/year in operating expenses in this market makes it a very formidable foe.

Foolish bottom line
Qualcomm's average smartphone platform selling price appears to be about $24. Of course, this would tend to suggest that the selling price of a higher-end product, like the Snapdragon 800 family, would be more in the high $30s/low $40s, as the lower end Snapdragon 400 products probably fetch more along the lines of $10-$15 per unit and dominate the volume.

While competition has been incoming for quite some time, it will be difficult for all but very few to compete with the breadth of the technology that Qualcomm currently offers, with only Intel spending at the level necessary to even have a prayer of longer-term technological parity. 

Qualcomm's great, but this opportunity could be even bigger!
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now... for just a fraction of the price of AAPL stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.

Ashraf Eassa owns shares of Intel. The Motley Fool recommends Intel. The Motley Fool owns shares of Intel and Qualcomm. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information