$13 Billion Bold Play: Zimmer Holdings, Inc's Purchase of Biomet

Zimmer's move to consolidate major joint recon should lead to significant cost savings, but top line growth could remain a challenge

Apr 24, 2014 at 2:30PM

In mid-December I wrote that there was at least some chance that ortho giant Zimmer (NYSE:ZMH) would make a bid for Biomet and become the dominant company in hip and knee implants, as well as leverage stronger share in areas like extremities, dental, trauma, and spine. That speculation has come to pass, as Zimmer has announced a $13.35 billion bid for Biomet. Assuming the deal passes regulatory scrunity, Zimmer is likely to see meaningful cost synergy, but there are risks involved in devoting such a large amount of capital to a market with some growth challenges.

The deal to be
Zimmer announced on April 24 that it had reached an agreement to acquire Biomet for $13.4 billion in cash and stock. Of the total, $10.35 billion will come in the form of cash and the company will issue close to 33 million shares for the stock component, resulting in Zimmer shareholders owning 84% of the combined company.

Zimmer management believes that the deal will add $1.10 to $1.30 to earnings per share in 2015 (versus a prior average estimate of $6.79), with potentially $270 million in synergies by 2017.

Becoming a strong #2
Combined, Zimmer and Biomet will hold about 17% of the orthopedic market, trailing only Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) at 21% share and leaping ahead of Stryker at around 13% share. Together, the two companies will hold almost 40% share of global hip implant market and about one-third of the knee implant market. Johnson & Johnson and Stryker will both still be very viable competitors with more than 20% share each and in each market, but Smith & Nephew may find it increasingly difficult to subsist on approximately 10% market share.

The benefits of becoming the leader in major joint recon may have been the prime motivation for the deal, but this combination adds scale in other markets as well. The two companies will hold about one-quarter of the fast-growing extremities market, with more than a third of the shoulder market. That may create considerable pressure on Johnson & Johnson and Tornier, but the combination will not be all that significant in the lower extremity (foot/ankle) market. Given Stryker's weaker positioning in the extremities market, it seems at least plausible that Zimmer's move will prompt a response to acquire its way into this faster-growing sub-market.

The deal also adds some scale to the combined spine, trauma, and dental businesses, but will not vault them into leadership or strong #2 positions.

A bold move
Zimmer is paying about 4.2 times Biomet's annualized trailing nine-month sales, not a particularly unreasonable figure. Johnson & Johnson paid almost 5x revenue for Synthes, but spine care and trauma were more highly regarded at the time. On the other hand, Zimmer appears to be paying considerably more on an EV/EBTIDA basis – around 17x versus around 11x in the JNJ-Synthes deal.

Cost synergies are going to be key to making this deal a winner, but the strong overlap should facilitate rationalizing R&D, marketing, and manufacturing efforts (the two companies are literally headquartered in the same city in Indiana). With this deal, management can pick and choose between the most promising products and programs and reduce redundant or overlapping administrative, marketing efforts.

There are a lot of common sense positives to this deal, but it is not without risk. First, there is a chance that regulatory bodies will object to the share that the companies will hold in particular markets and they may demand divestitures.

There is also the market itself to consider. Major joints seem to be recovering from a prolonged slump, but reimbursement pressure and price sensitivity have become significant factors in the market and the FDA has tightened up its standards for new approvals. The aging of North America and Western Europe, as well as the modernization of the health care systems in countries like China, should provide could underlying volume, but there is nevertheless the risk that Zimmer has made a very large deal to expand a slow-growing business.

The bottom line
Back in December I thought that a deal could spur a significant move in Zimmer's shares, and the stock was up more than 10% on the Biomet deal news as of midday Thursday. That seems like a pretty fair reaction, and I would say that the shares remain priced to deliver mid-to-high single-digit returns, with potential upside from better synergies in the Biomet deal.

Looking for more growth? Here are 6 stock picks poised for incredible growth
They said it couldn't be done. But David Gardner has proved them wrong time, and time, and time again with stock returns like 926%, 2,239%, and 4,371%. In fact, just recently one of his favorite stocks became a 100-bagger. And he's ready to do it again. You can uncover his scientific approach to crushing the market and his carefully chosen six picks for ultimate growth instantly, because he's making this premium report free for you today. Click here now for access.

Stephen D. Simpson, CFA has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Johnson & Johnson. The Motley Fool owns shares of Johnson & Johnson and Zimmer Holdings. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information