Should Amazon Acquire Sears?

Once a powerhouse in American retail, Sears Holdings (NASDAQ: SHLD  ) has now become one of the most hard-pressed department store chains in the sector. Having battled through some 28 consecutive quarters of sales declines, a daunting number to say the least, time might be running out for the company that has so far failed to produce a sustained turnaround.

However, there may be one way to save the struggling retailer. Some analysts, most notably retail expert Robin Lewis, believe that a takeover by Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN  ) would benefit both companies and that it is perhaps the only way to keep Sears alive.

What's in it for Amazon?
Amazon, rapidly becoming the biggest US retailer, has several reasons to be interested in Sears, according to Lewis. While Amazon is currently the dominant force in online shopping, it still has a fairly limited offline footprint. At the moment, the company only has fulfillment centers in about 14 states, and CEO Jeff Bezos is looking to expand this network.

Sears, which together with K-Mart has about 2,400 retail locations, would almost instantly provide Amazon with a huge network of potential fulfillment centers; this would boost Amazon's omnichannel presence, allowing easier pick-ups and drop-offs for customers and speeding up deliveries. Moreover, the deal would represent a bargain for Amazon, according to Lewis. Sears is currently trading at a fairly steep discount due to its financial woes, currently on the market at only 0.1 times sales. Moreover, Sears still has a number of valuable brands which Amazon could resurrect.

The question is whether it would be cheaper for Amazon to acquire Sears' retail locations than to build its own fullfilment centers. Since 2010, Amazon has embarked on a $13.9 billion spending spree on fulfillment expenses, and in 2013 owned around 329,000 square feet of fulfillment and data centers with 94 of its own warehouses. As for leases, the company company spent $963 million on capital leases and $752 million on operating leases in 2013, and some $2.3 billion on fulfillment expenses in the first quarter of 2014, up from around $1.8 billion last year. For the first quarter of this year, property and equipment acquired under capital leases totalled $716 million, up from $340 million last year, so Amazon is definitely not afraid to spend money on real estate.

Now let's take a look at what Amazon might get if it purchased Sears outright. Sears owns or occupies about 2% of US retail space, which is more than 260 million square feet, and analysts value its property holdings at between $4 billion and $7 billion. As the company has a current market cap of $4.6 billion, this property seems like it's trading at a discount, and definitely costs less than the $13.9 billion Amazon is currently spending on new fulfillment centers. On paper, it looks like a good deal. However, there would be other costs involved.

While a greater offline presence would further solidify Amazon's dominant position, not everybody is convinced it would be a good move for the online retail giant. According to some analysts, the costs of retrofitting K-Mart and Sears locations would be a huge burden, potentially outweighing the benefits. Moreover, some analysts have cast doubts on the value of Sears' property, as there are already 119 closed Sears location available for sale, and that the company will become even cheaper in the future as it is still unprofitable.

What's in it for Sears?
This one is almost a no-brainer. Sears posted a loss of around $1.4 billion last year, and CEO Eddie Lampert is assumed to be looking for an exit strategy. The company has already been working on selling, leasing, and closing its Sears and K-Mart locations and has embarked on a complicated process of reorganization into some 30 business units.

Sears has simply not been holding up as well as its competitors in an increasingly difficult brick-and-mortar retail environment. Target (NYSE: TGT  ) , for example, has been trying to take the fight to Amazon's doorstep, recently introducing a program called Target Subscriptions. This service allows customers to order more than 1,500 daily use products such as printer ink, laundry detergent, and diapers with free shipping at a 5% discount. While the move is unlikely to steal away any significant business from Amazon, it indicates that Target is willing to put up a fight.

The bottom line
Sears has been struggling for some time now, and things seem unlikely to improve any time soon. With Lampert reportedly on the lookout for an exit strategy, already having sold and closed a number of Sears and K-Mart locations, speculation is growing that Amazon might put in a bid for the embattled retail chain. Such a deal would allow Amazon to potentially expand its offline footprint in a big way, and save Sears. However, some doubt the value of Sears' property, and argue that a potential tie-up would not be as good as it looks. With the rumors unconfirmed, Amazon still seems happy with building its own fulfillment centers.

6 stock picks poised for incredible growth
They said it couldn't be done. But David Gardner has proved them wrong time, and time, and time again with stock returns like 926%, 2,239%, and 4,371%. In fact, just recently one of his favorite stocks became a 100-bagger. And he's ready to do it again. You can uncover his scientific approach to crushing the market and his carefully chosen six picks for ultimate growth instantly, because he's making this premium report free for you today. Click here now for access.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 28, 2014, at 7:40 AM, richinc wrote:

    NO WAY!! Sears is toxic. The work environment has been ruined from the top down, and is cannibalism at its best. The capital improvements would be tremendous, and the locations are not the greatest. Sears is shedding its locations for a reason, and they DON'T own the dealer stores. The logistic/POS infrastructure is archaic at best. There is nothing Sears has to offer a modern day business. Eddie brags about his portable "shop your way" customers. Because of his operating style, many of those numbers are fictitious. Like most of Sears, its smoke and mirrors. Eddie is truly running an evil empire, that is toxic beyond belief. That, has ruined its customer loyalty and the once good name of Sears. It is NOT the Sears you grew-up with. The name itself is becoming meaningless in todays culture. Eddie Lampert castrated the 800 lb gorilla single handed, with a butter knife...... And, he's proud of his work!!

  • Report this Comment On April 28, 2014, at 9:43 AM, craiganddog wrote:

    This idea is just plain silly. The strength that Amazon has is mostly due to its lack of a brick and mortar presence.

    Why would anyone want a complex screwed up organization with a hostile and undereducated workforce. If you have ever tried to do any kind of a deal that involved either delivery or repair with Sears you know that the organization is just plain broken.

    Sears just needs to be allowed to die.

  • Report this Comment On April 28, 2014, at 11:09 AM, rivington78 wrote:

    this story has been rehashed for 1 1/2 weeks now forbes cnbc a few other spots and now here

    article doesn't even mention their debt and liabilities

    value of assets = value of stock?

    huh

    very sloppy

    the focus should be on constructive solutions to actually compete in the retail business not on why companies that are eating their lunch should pay a premium to buy them

  • Report this Comment On April 28, 2014, at 12:54 PM, crockett57 wrote:

    Unless Amazon is secretly harboring a death wish, they shouldn't touch that pig with someone else's 10 ft pole. Their decline is attributed to mostly getting what they paid for. They pay trash in wages thereby attracting the grade of worker they bargained for. They took on K-mart as another pig that operates under a similar model and metrics. What was anyone expecting? In essence this is yet another retail 'birds of a feather scenario' in which the market shot this down syndrome plagued fowl out of the sky. Unless Jeff has some obscure long (and I mean l o n g ) term strategy that involves share prices taking a hit, he would be out of his mind to even consider it. As an aside, if his strategy was to acquire SHLD for the sake of converting stores into warehouse/outlets, he would do far better to acquire properties and pull buildings out of the ground fine tuned to his mid to long term strategic interests. Even Sears' properties are bloated and the cost to retrofit them are not even feasible.

  • Report this Comment On April 28, 2014, at 5:27 PM, Dangremaus wrote:

    You guys have to understand that if Bezos wants, he can purchase SOME of the real estate--not the whole Sears Holdings company. 70 K-Marts are closing this year alone, which would be nice for Bezos' plans to create distributorships all over the nation. And I'm sure he can pick and choose which real estate he wants.

    With new physical locations using old K-Marts (or Sears), he could hire delivery people and bypass shipping costs from FedEx and UPS.

    He has mentioned this in his future plans. All he needs is the established real estate locations...

  • Report this Comment On May 01, 2014, at 2:06 AM, buddy2510 wrote:

    If they sell off K-mart. Sears just might have a chance. Buying that was one of the biggest mistakes. Eddie should've left that alone but he's looking at the real estate and he got burned for it.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2931923, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2014 8:38:40 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement