Intel's Bay Trail Fights AMD's Kabini: Which Has the Best Performance?

Intel's low-cost Bay Trail product for PCs goes head-to-head with AMD's offerings in the space. Who ultimately wins the race?

Apr 28, 2014 at 3:15PM

In the era of mobile computing, it is no longer enough to look at raw performance numbers. The name of the game is performance per watt, and it matters in just about every paradigm of computing, from the hungriest data centers to the most compact smartphones. A recent report from site Techspot did a head-to-head comparison of Intel's (NASDAQ:INTC) low-end Celeron J1900 (based on the same technology that Intel is selling into tablets) and AMD's (NASDAQ:AMD) low-end Sempron, which is based on AMD's own low-power Jaguar core. The performance-per-watt results are interesting.

CPU performance: an Intel blowout
Here is a table that puts together all of the results for the CPU-limited tests that Techspot ran on both the Celeron J1900 and the Sempron 3850:


Intel Celeron J1900

AMD Sempron 3850

Microsoft Excel 2013 (MonteCarlo -- lower is better)



Microsoft PowerPoint 2013 (lower is better)



7-zip Benchmark



Mozailla Kraken JavaScript (lower is better)



WinRAR (kilobytes per second; singlethread/multithread)



Adobe Photoshop CS6 (lower is better)



Adobe After Effects CS6 (lower is better)



Adobe Illustrator CS6 (lower is better)



It's a no-brainer here, folks: Intel's Silvermont-based Celeron J1900 blows the doors off the AMD Jaguar-based in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the next question that people will surely be interested in is the power consumption at full load. Techspot, unfortunately, did not do power consumption tests for each of these individual workloads, but it did manage to run a well-known power virus known as Prime95 to get a sense of the full-throttle power consumption of each of these parts.

CPU performance-per-watt: now this is just embarrassing
Techspot measured the following:

  1. Idle power consumption (i.e., power consumed when the system is doing nothing);
  2. Power consumption at full CPU load pegging all four CPU cores in both chips; and
  3. Power consumption running both Prime95 (CPU power virus) and FurMark (graphics power virus).

The results are reproduced in the table below:


Intel Celeron J1900

AMD Sempron 3850




CPU load



CPU + GPU Load



From these results, we can isolate the power consumption of each of the subsystems:


Intel Celeron J1900

AMD Sempron 3850







To put this in perspective, Intel's chip offers significantly higher performance than the AMD chip, but consumes less than half of the power. From a CPU perspective, this is a complete and utter blowout in Intel's favor, and it's no wonder that AMD continues to lose PC share, particularly at the low end where Intel had been -- until now -- largely absent with competitive offerings.

What about graphics?
The GPU story, however, is interesting. Let's take a look at the graphics performance across the games that Techspot tested, keeping in mind that at full load the Celeron J1900 GPU consumes 4W and the Sempron 3850 consumes 7W:

1680x1050 Gaming

Intel Celeron J1900

AMD Sempron 3850

Company of Heroes 2



Metro Last Light



Hitman Absolution



Tomb Raider



BioShock Infinite






Average FPS



If we look at the average frames per second (at 1680x1050, the more GPU intensive resolution), we see that AMD's solution is, on average, 66% faster. Interestingly enough, AMD's GPU solution consumes 3W more power than Intel's GPU, or 75% more power, implying that Intel's GPU is technically the more power efficient one here. That said, it's easier to be more efficient at lower performance levels, so this can hardly called a decisive win for Intel, but it is hardly a performance/watt blowout in AMD's favor in the way Intel's CPU is much more efficient.

Foolish bottom line
At the end of the day, it looks as though Intel has a massive CPU performance efficiency lead that extends beyond Intel's advantage with the 22-nanometer node over AMD's 28-nanometer part. Intel has what appears to be the superior CPU architecture, while AMD has a GPU performance edge at the expense of a higher power budget. Given that these GPUs are both incapable of playing modern PC games at high frame rates anyway, most people buying these platforms will notice CPU performance over GPU performance. Unfortunately for AMD and fortunately for Intel, it is likely that Intel will continue to gain meaningful share in the low end of the PC market with its Bay Trail product.

Like Intel in the '90s, this tech stock is set to pop on Apple's next big thing!
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now... for just a fraction of the price of AAPL stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.

Ashraf Eassa owns shares of Intel. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Intel. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information