Is Tapping Zach Snyder to Direct 'Justice League' a Risk for Warner Bros.?

Warner Bros. recently revealed that its upcoming "Justice League" film would be helmed by Zach Snyder, director of last year's "Man of Steel" and the upcoming "Batman vs. Superman" film. Is this a smart move, or could the studio be taking too big of a risk?

Apr 28, 2014 at 1:01PM

Fans have known for a while that a "Justice League" movie was planned, and that the upcoming "Batman vs. Superman" sequel to 2013's Man of Steel would help set up the team-up film. What wasn't known was exactly how long they would have to wait or who would be behind the camera when it finally started filming. Thanks to a Wall Street Journal exclusive with Greg Silverman, president of worldwide production at Time Warner's (NYSE:TWX) Warner Bros. studio, those questions have been answered.

While at one point there was a "Flash" film planned for release between the Man of Steel sequel and a "Justice League" film, there was no mention of it from Silverman. Instead, "Justice League" seems like it will go into production directly after "Batman vs. Superman" and will be Warner's third release in its new DC Comics film universe. Not only that, but it will once again have director Zach Snyder calling the shots.

Snyder again?
Given that Snyder directed Man of Steel and is fixing to start production on "Batman vs. Superman," he seems like somewhat of an obvious choice as director of the upcoming "Justice League" film. With that said, there's a difference between "obvious" choice and "best" choice. Is Warner making a mistake by bringing Snyder back for a third film?

The problem is that this essentially sets up "Justice League" as another Man of Steel sequel, giving it the same general look and feel as the movies that come before it. This makes it more dependent on the success of those films, and also significantly increases the chances of fan fatigue. The rest of the DC cinematic universe will spin off from it, as opposed to the separate films coming together for a "Justice League" film after the different characters have established their own styles and personalities.

Could Snyder bring diminishing returns?
Man of Steel did well at the box office, bringing in $668 million worldwide in its theatrical run. To say that it was divisive among fans would be an understatement, however. The controversy surrounding Superman taking the life of an opponent didn't hurt the film's performance (and in his defense, he's also killed a version of Zod in the comics ... though that was some old continuity), but it's still a frequent talking point among those who feel that Superman wasn't portrayed well.

This was followed up by the highly controversial casting of Ben Affleck as Batman and news that more Justice League members would be appearing in the film as well. While cameos can help set up the "Justice League" movie, they can also make a film seem crowded; just ask 21st Century Fox (NASDAQ:FOX) about the complaints it received about having too many characters packed into X-Men: The Last Stand and X-Men Origins: Wolverine.

If "Batman vs. Superman" fails to connect with moviegoers who were on the fence after Man of Steel and the film's casting reports, having Snyder locked in for "Justice League" could become a liability. If nothing else, it seems that Warner Bros. is getting ahead of itself in hopes of catching up to The Avengers.

Hoping to be Marvel-ous
It's no secret that Warner Bros. is hoping to enjoy the same success with its shared film universe that Disney's (NYSE: DIS) Marvel Studios has found with its comic films. The "Phase 1" Marvel films largely performed well, and The Avengers is the third top-grossing film of all time (without adjustments for inflation). It was then followed directly by the $1.2 billion take of Iron Man 3. Both of the films that have been released since (Thor: The Dark World and Captain America: The Winter Soldier) have brought in over $640 million, and the latter is still going strong at the box office.

While Warner Bros. found success with Christopher Nolan's "Dark Knight" trilogy, other attempts at bringing DC characters to the big screen haven't gone over so well. Both Jonah Hex and Green Lantern flopped, and even the previous attempt at adapting Superman (2006's Superman Returns) fell short of success with only a $391 million worldwide take on a $270 million budget (since marketing costs and other expenses mean the film likely lost money). Man of Steel is serving as the launching point for a new DC cinematic universe simply because it did well in theaters.

Too much, too soon
Provided that the "Batman vs. Superman" film performs well, the "Justice League" movie will likely benefit from having the same general style as the previous two films. With that said, poor reviews or weak box office performance could dampen Warner's enthusiasm for its new universe. Right now it's banking on being able to build a blockbuster franchise that all fits into Snyder's vision, but if the fans start to question that vision, it could result in another aborted attempt to launch a big-screen crossover franchise.

That's one of the big advantages that Marvel Studios has had. Separate films and franchises have different creative teams, allowing them to develop on their own without trying to make every film fit the mold of the last. If Warner Bros. really wants to capture the Marvel magic, it's going to need to step away from Snyder's vision at some point and let its DC universe grow.

Are you ready to profit from this $14.4 trillion revolution?
Let's face it, every investor wants to get in on revolutionary ideas before they hit it big. Like buying PC-maker Dell in the late 1980s, before the consumer computing boom. Or purchasing stock in e-commerce pioneer in the late 1990s, when it was nothing more than an upstart online bookstore. The problem is, most investors don't understand the key to investing in hyper-growth markets. The real trick is to find a small-cap "pure-play" and then watch as it grows in EXPLOSIVE lockstep with its industry. Our expert team of equity analysts has identified one stock that's poised to produce rocket-ship returns with the next $14.4 TRILLION industry. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening report.

John Casteele has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Money to your ears - A great FREE investing resource for you

The best way to get your regular dose of market and money insights is our suite of free podcasts ... what we like to think of as “binge-worthy finance.”

Feb 1, 2016 at 5:03PM

Whether we're in the midst of earnings season or riding out the market's lulls, you want to know the best strategies for your money.

And you'll want to go beyond the hype of screaming TV personalities, fear-mongering ads, and "analysis" from people who might have your email address ... but no track record of success.

In short, you want a voice of reason you can count on.

A 2015 Business Insider article titled, "11 websites to bookmark if you want to get rich," rated The Motley Fool as the #1 place online to get smarter about investing.

And one of the easiest, most enjoyable, most valuable ways to get your regular dose of market and money insights is our suite of free podcasts ... what we like to think of as "binge-worthy finance."

Whether you make it part of your daily commute or you save up and listen to a handful of episodes for your 50-mile bike rides or long soaks in a bubble bath (or both!), the podcasts make sense of your money.

And unlike so many who want to make the subjects of personal finance and investing complicated and scary, our podcasts are clear, insightful, and (yes, it's true) fun.

Our free suite of podcasts

Motley Fool Money features a team of our analysts discussing the week's top business and investing stories, interviews, and an inside look at the stocks on our radar. The show is also heard weekly on dozens of radio stations across the country.

The hosts of Motley Fool Answers challenge the conventional wisdom on life's biggest financial issues to reveal what you really need to know to make smart money moves.

David Gardner, co-founder of The Motley Fool, is among the most respected and trusted sources on investing. And he's the host of Rule Breaker Investing, in which he shares his insights into today's most innovative and disruptive companies ... and how to profit from them.

Market Foolery is our daily look at stocks in the news, as well as the top business and investing stories.

And Industry Focus offers a deeper dive into a specific industry and the stories making headlines. Healthcare, technology, energy, consumer goods, and other industries take turns in the spotlight.

They're all informative, entertaining, and eminently listenable. Rule Breaker Investing and Answers are timeless, so it's worth going back to and listening from the very start; the other three are focused more on today's events, so listen to the most recent first.

All are available for free at

If you're looking for a friendly voice ... with great advice on how to make the most of your money ... from a business with a lengthy track record of success ... in clear, compelling language ... I encourage you to give a listen to our free podcasts.

Head to, give them a spin, and you can subscribe there (at iTunes, Stitcher, or our other partners) if you want to receive them regularly.

It's money to your ears.


Compare Brokers