Can Marvel Unify its Video Games With the ‘Marvel Gaming Universe’?

Marvel is trying to unify its video game universe in the same manner as its movies. Could this ambitious plan work?

May 2, 2014 at 7:31AM

Disney (NYSE:DIS)/Marvel Comics recently discussed the development of a unified "Marvel Gaming Universe" at Marvel's House of Ideas panel at C2E2 (Chicago Comic & Entertainment Expo). The idea is to connect Marvel's fragmented universe of video games with a cohesive vision, similar to the way it unified its film world as the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

The plan is to have Marvel's own comic book writers write or oversee the development of Marvel's upcoming video games to ensure that they share a consistent voice with the source material. This isn't the first time Marvel's talked about creating a Marvel Gaming Universe -- Marvel's VP of Games, TQ Jefferson, made the same claim at SXSW in March.

Marvel Vs Capcom

Capcom's Marvel vs. Capcom 3. Source: Capcom.

Easier said than done
This idea isn't a new one -- Time Warner (NYSE:TWX)/DC Comics accomplished this successfully with the Batman Arkham games, which were originally developed by Rocksteady. The three main Arkham games, which have sold over 21 million copies worldwide, successfully merged the comic book, cartoon, and video game worlds of Batman into a single interactive experience that felt like a natural extension of all three.

Marvel video games are more scattered -- some games are based on the cartoons, others are based on the films, while others are crossover titles with other franchises. Over the past five years, over a dozen publishers have released Marvel titles on various platforms.

By comparison, Warner Bros. has published all of its comic book-based console, PC, and mobile video games over the past five years. Only two arcade games -- Justice League: Heroes United (2009) and Batman (2013) -- weren't published by Warner.

In a clear effort to bring its characters home, Marvel recently asked Capcom, Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI), and several other companies to discontinue digital distribution of several Marvel titles. Some of the delisted games include Spider-Man: Web of Shadows, X-Men: The Official Game, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, and Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3. Licensing agreements with both companies will expire soon, according to EGM.

Marvel will likely bring these franchises home to Disney Interactive Studios, which recently announced the crossover title Disney Infinity: Marvel Super Heroes, which will mix together its Disney, Pixar, and Marvel characters together in a telepod-powered sandbox.


Disney Infinity: Marvel Super Heroes. Source: Disney.

Can Marvel make better games than Activision and Capcom?
Even if Marvel can bring its video game characters home, can it really make better games than seasoned publishers like Activision and Capcom? After all, Activision's X-Men Origins: Wolverine and Capcom's Marvel vs. Capcom series are consistently regarded as fan favorite titles.

It's easy to look at Rocksteady's stellar work on Arkham Asylum and Arkham City and claim that comic book writers are the key to creating great games. But that wasn't always the case. Over a decade ago, Ubisoft (NASDAQOTH:UBSFF) published Batman: Vengeance, a continuation of Paul Dini and Bruce Timm's animated series, and Batman: Rise of Sin Tzu, which featured a new character created by artist Jim Lee. Both titles were praised for their stories and voice acting, but were criticized for bland, lackluster gameplay. Vengeance sold less than a million copies, while Sin Tzu only sold 590,000.

In video games, creating great gameplay is usually the primary objective, whereas scripting a stunning story is secondary. Ideally, a great game would excel at both, but few people want to play a beautifully written game if the game is too clunky or monotonous to finish.

So far, Marvel has only taken baby steps in expanding its own universe. The first step was a Facebook game, Avengers Alliance, which was later tied into a full-featured mobile game, Avengers Initiative. Other games within Marvel's gaming universe include Marvel Puzzle Quest: Dark Reign, Marvel War of Heroes, Iron Man 3 and Captain America: The Winter Soldier.

Last June, In response to Warner's free-to-play MMORPG DC Universe Online, Marvel Entertainment released its own MMO, Marvel Heroes. The game was developed by Gazillion Studios and written by Brian Michael Bendis, the creator of Marvel's "Ultimate" universe. However, Heroes met the same icy reception as Ubisoft's Batman games -- IGN gave the game a 5.7/10 rating, stating that the story was good, but that combat and customization features were mediocre. By comparison, IGN gave DC Universe Online (the PS4 version) an 8/10 rating.


Marvel Heroes. Source: Marvel.

Should Marvel leave well enough alone?
If Marvel Heroes is an early indication of where the Marvel Gaming Universe is headed, Disney would be better off letting Activision and Capcom do the heavy lifting instead.

Disney acquired gaming studio LucasArts in October 2012, but shut it down the following April to salvage its valuable IPs, because LucasArts was redundant with Disney's Interactive division. Disney then signed a deal with Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA) in November 2013 to exclusively produce Star Wars titles for the next decade, since EA housed BioWare, the creator of the acclaimed Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, and the remnants of Pandemic, the creators of the Star Wars: Battlefront series.

Therefore, it might be a better idea for Marvel to sign exclusive long-term deals with its best publishers, instead of pushing them away. The idea of hiring comic book writers to "unify" its entire video game universe isn't clever -- it's overly ambitious and doesn't take into account the different genres of games that are on the market.

Simply put, gamers don't love Marvel vs. Capcom because of the story -- they love it because it lets them pit Chun Li against the Hulk. Gamers adored Activision's Spider-Man titles because Treyarch effortlessly created the adrenaline-pumping sensation of swinging from building to building in an open sandbox.

My final take
In conclusion, if Marvel simply wants to assist studios in developing a unified voice for its games, I'm all for it. However, if Marvel discontinues licensing agreements with Activision, Capcom, and other publishers entirely, that could be a huge mistake.

What do you think, fellow Marvel fans? Is creating a unified Marvel Gaming Universe a clever move or a foolish one? Share your thoughts in the comments section below! 

6 stock picks poised for incredible growth
They said it couldn't be done. But David Gardner has proved them wrong time, and time, and time again with stock returns like 926%, 2,239%, and 4,371%. In fact, just recently one of his favorite stocks became a 100-bagger. And he's ready to do it again. You can uncover his scientific approach to crushing the market and his carefully chosen six picks for ultimate growth instantly, because he's making this premium report free for you today. Click here now for access.

Leo Sun owns shares of Facebook and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends Activision Blizzard, Facebook, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Activision Blizzard, Facebook, and Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information