The Dow Misses a New Record as Merck, Pfizer, and J&J Lag

The Dow's three big pharma stocks led the list of declining components Friday. Find out what happened.

May 2, 2014 at 9:05PM

After climbing to potential new-record levels at the open, the Dow Jones Industrials (DJINDICES:^DJI) closed down almost 46 points on Friday, with trouble in Ukraine heating up and prompting an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council in response to violence in Black Sea port city Odessa. Even with news that the U.S. economy produced 288,000 new nonfarm jobs in April, the Dow couldn't overcome negative sentiment and fear of future trouble. Moreover, the Dow's full contingent of pharmaceutical stocks led the average downward, as Pfizer (NYSE:PFE), Merck (NYSE:MRK), and Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) were the worst performers in the Dow Jones Industrials today.


A combination of factors helped hold the Dow's pharma stocks down Friday. For Pfizer, which fell 1.3%, the most likely culprit was news that the company's second attempt to buy out AstraZeneca had, once again, failed to gain acceptance, as the British drugmaker said that Pfizer's upped bid was still insufficient. With Pfizer offering about $106 billion for the company, investors have to be concerned that any further concessions to raise the price will start to erode the potential cost savings, and other advantages from a combination. In many ways, AstraZeneca is in the strongest negotiating position, as its domicile gives Pfizer a chance to take advantage of favorable foreign tax treatment, creating a huge opportunity for long-term savings. Shareholders might well have to accept paying even more in order to get the longer-term benefits of a merger deal.


Source: Steven Depolo, Flickr.

Meanwhile, Merck fell 2.4% after suffering a minor defeat on the clinical front, as a drug that Merck and a partner were hoping would become a viable treatment for ovarian cancer got a negative recommendation from the monitoring board overseeing the phase 3 trial. The results were somewhat shocking given positive results in other arenas, even for the same drug. But while it was a huge deal for the smaller partner company, the impact of stopping the trial isn't significant for Merck. News after the bell that an FDA panel voted against allowing Merck to sell its asthma treatment Singulair as an over-the-counter allergy medication could also hurt the drugmaker, although many saw the last-ditch effort to try to renew the now off-patent medication's ability to generate profits for Merck as unlikely to succeed.

Johnson & Johnson dropped 1.2%, seemingly in concert with its peers. Johnson & Johnson only gets about 40% of its revenue from pharmaceuticals, although that proportion has increased lately as the company emphasizes drug development over other segments like medical devices and over-the-counter products. Unlike Merck and Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson hasn't suffered from falling sales in recent years, as its diversified health-care exposure and different timeline of patent expirations has sheltered it from the full brunt of the patent cliff that Merck and Pfizer faced. Still, with Johnson & Johnson increasingly relying on pharmaceuticals as its main growth prospect, investors are right to link J&J's fortunes with those of Pfizer and Merck.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Dan Caplinger has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Johnson & Johnson. The Motley Fool owns shares of Johnson & Johnson. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information